Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 23 Feb 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Andrew Harrett

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Andrew Harrett

  • Postcode verified

    RG22 4HS

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+65Positivemore positive than 89% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisegood progressmake good progressenjoyclearlystrengthspositivelyconsistentlyindependent
Criticisminconsistentnot consistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings627w+62
  • Leadership236w+13
  • What needs to improve114w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
950
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 48
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Leadership 24%What needs to improve 12%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr D Eyre Headteacher Brighton Hill Community College Brighton Way Basingstoke Hampshire RG22 4HS

p.1

impact of the new Key Stage 3 curriculum

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 02 December 2008 to look at work in planning for and implementing the new Key Stage 3 curriculum with particular reference to Year 7.

p.1

impact of the new Key Stage 3 curriculum

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

impact of the new Key Stage 3 curriculum

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with staff and students, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of students’ work and observation of four lessons.

p.1

impact of the new Key Stage 3 curriculum

The overall effectiveness of the planning for and implementation of the new Key Stage 3 curriculum was judged to be satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Standards on entry to the present Year 7 were around the national average. At this early stage of the implementation of the new Key Stage 3 curriculum, it is not possible to make a firm judgement on its impact on achievement, but the progress of the students observed in lessons was good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Exercise books confirmed the good progress observed in lessons.  Achievement in the national tests at the end of Year 9 in 2008 was satisfactory.  The students make good progress in developing independent learning skills in lessons.  The curriculum makes a good contribution to the students’ personal development and well-being. Students report that they enjoy school and speak enthusiastically about the many opportunities to try new things and join clubs.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning

The quality of teaching and learning in Year 7 is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

 Learning objectives are clear, precise and linked to varied tasks and activities in lessons.  Good questioning techniques probe the students’ understanding and encourage them to reflect on their learning.  There is a good balance between providing support for students when they need it and challenging them to work independently.  Teachers have good subject knowledge.  Individual lessons are clearly linked to the students’ previous learning.  In some subjects marking clearly shows students what they have achieved and how they could improve their work. However, this is not consistent across the school.  The students report that in some subjects they are repeating work done in Year 6 and in these instances they do not feel as challenged to improve their standards as in other lessons.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

The quality of the new curriculum in Year 7 is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

 The new curriculum builds on the strengths of the previous structure well. Arrangements for completing the programmes of study by the end of Year 8 in subjects other than English, mathematics and science are well established and work well.  Subject leaders in most areas have responded well to reducing the content in schemes of work, allowing more time for reflection and active learning in lessons.  The students respond positively to the new arrangements for teaching personal development and religious education thorough the Preparation for Life course.  Subjects are at different stages of introducing personal learning and thinking skills and functional skills into schemes of work. There is some good practice in these areas, but this is inconsistent across the school.  Although the non-statutory Dimensions feature in subjects, there is no whole school mapping of where these are covered.

p.2

Leadership and management of the new Key Stage 3 curriculum

The leadership and management of the new Key Stage 3 curriculum are satisfactory.

p.3

Leadership and management of the new Key Stage 3 curriculum

 The priority for the school this year has been to develop the 14 to 19 curriculum rather than the new curriculum for Key Stage 3.  The school has made some use of external training for the new Key Stage 3 curriculum, but this has not been attended by all subject leaders. Those who did attend found it useful and practical.  Senior leaders have ensured that subject leaders know what the requirements are within their own subjects, but there has been no whole staff presentation on the aims of the new curriculum across subjects. Consequently, subjects have tended to work in isolation and not all staff are fully aware of how particular subjects contribute to the whole curriculum.  There is currently no overview of how cross-curricular elements of the curriculum which underpin and enrich subjects, such as personal learning and thinking skills, functional skills and the non-statutory Dimensions, are being delivered across the school. Consequently the

p.3

Leadership and management of the new Key Stage 3 curriculum

school does not as yet know whether some are being given undue prominence or whether some are not being sufficiently developed.  Specialist status in sport and modern foreign languages is making a satisfactory contribution to the development of the new curriculum. Proposals for cross-curricular work linked to the specialist subjects are well conceived and provide a good opportunity for developing the new curriculum.

p.3

Inclusion

The impact of the curriculum on inclusion is good.

p.3

Inclusion

 The curriculum is inclusive and allows access by all students.  All groups of students were seen to be making good progress in the lessons observed.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 developing whole-school strategies to map the delivery of personal learning and thinking skills, functional skills and the non-statutory Dimensions coherently across the school  ensuring that schemes of work in Year 7 and the style of teaching and learning consistently build on the students’ experience in Year 6 and promote achievement from the start of Year 7.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop the curriculum in the school. As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion