Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 15 Nov 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Ian Richardson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ian Richardson

  • Postcode verified

    LS13 2LQ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+40Positivemore positive than 72% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositivestronggood progressimprovingindependentclearconsistent
Criticismnot consistentlynot sufficientlybelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings450w+23
  • Leadership153w+50
  • What needs to improve91w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
669
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 53%Leadership 18%What needs to improve 11%About the inspection 19%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms K Allan Headteacher Whitecote Primary School Wellington Grove Bramley Leeds West Yorkshire LS13 2LQ

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit with George Falconer HMI on 24 September to look at work in science.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of science, the visit had a particular focus on transition within and between phases; the range of learning experiences; the status and use of SC1.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with you and the science subject leader, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of parts of five lessons.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science

The overall effectiveness of science was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Standards are around the national average. Achievement is good overall.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Pupils enter the school well below the expected level and by the end of Key Stage 2 the standards are around the national average. This evidences good achievement.  The school is aware of some girls’ underachievement at the end of Key Stage 2 and they are reviewing the provision to improve this situation.  The Foundation Stage is providing pupils with a strong basis for further learning higher up the school.  Standards seen in science lessons are at least satisfactory and good progress is seen to be made by the majority of pupils.  There is an increased focus on standards and achievement in science this year which includes closer monitoring of lessons.  Pupils’ personal development is good as evidenced by their good behaviour and the positive ways they take responsibility for their work and collaborate with others.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning of science

The quality of teaching and learning is good overall.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of science

 The best teaching seen was associated with pupils making decisions, planning and evaluating the work they do.  In some lessons teaching and learning were only satisfactory because of over-direction by teachers and teaching assistants.  Planning is good and, in the main, provides a range of activities to engage all pupils. Lessons are usually well paced and appropriate to the needs of pupils.  The resources used in teaching and the management of learning areas are good.  There is good use of information communication technology (ICT) for a range of purposes including display, and independent learning.  There are good strategies for assessment, including assessment for learning but this is not consistently carried out.  Teachers have good relationships with pupils and treat them with care and respect. This contributes to the good levels of application and behaviour of pupils.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

 The provision in science meets the requirements of the National Curriculum. Scientific enquiry rightly is the focus of much of the work in science.  Science is taught in contexts relevant to pupils and well related to other areas of learning. These cross-curricular connections are being developed as part of a renewed vision for the curriculum which centres on the development of key skills.  The curriculum is, on the whole, well matched to pupils’ needs. In a few classes the work was not sufficiently differentiated.  ICT plays a significant part in the learning experiences of pupils and science is used well as a context for developing skills in ICT, numeracy and literacy.

p.2

Leadership and management of science

Leadership and management of science are good.

p.2

Leadership and management of science

 There are clear documents guiding developments in science.  Good long term planning provides a framework for class teachers to plan their science lessons at medium and short terms.  The senior leadership has initiated a programme of reform to develop the ‘creative curriculum’, the focus of which is for science and all other subjects developing good learners.  Planning for science is increasingly focused on the development of key skills and the skills of scientific enquiry permeate much of the work in science.  Positive developments include the refinement of assessment systems, improving consistency on in such matters as marking to provide pupils with the information they need to improve.  Monitoring and evaluation of lessons have been underdeveloped in science because of the focus on mathematics and English. A main focus in the school development plan is the implementation of monitoring in science.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 developing a more consistent approach to assessment and improving the quality of feedback to pupils  monitoring and evaluating science teaching in a systematic way to ensure pupils are receiving the science education they deserve.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop science in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion