Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 15 Nov 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Ruth James

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ruth James

  • Postcode verified

    BL6 6HW

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+90Very positivemore positive than 98% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivevery wellvery effectiveoutstandingmake good progressenthusiasticcleareffectively

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings360w+86
  • Leadership96w+75
  • What needs to improve109w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
538
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 48
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 53%Leadership 14%What needs to improve 16%About the inspection 17%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr L Conley Headteacher St Joseph's RC High School and Sports College Chorley New Road Horwich Bolton Lancashire BL6 6HW

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 23-24 September to look at work in science.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: analysis of data, interviews with staff and learners, scrutiny of relevant documentation, students’ work and observation of lessons.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science

The overall effectiveness of science was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Standards are above average and achievement is good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 The proportions of students gaining GCSE grades A*-C in science subjects are significantly above national averages.  In national tests at Key Stage 3 in 2007 close to 90% of the students attained the expected Level 5 and over half attained above the expected level.  Overall students make good progress in science during their time at the school.  Students’ behaviour is very good.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning

Teaching and learning in science are good.  Teachers are committed, hard working and enthusiastic.  Relationships between students and teachers are good, and this encourages productive interactions in lessons which promote learning.  Learning materials such as worksheets are well presented and effective.  Some effective use of question and answer was observed.  A variety of activities is used in lessons to engage interest, motivate and develop understanding.  Teachers’ expositions are particularly clear. Teachers explain concepts very well, and they make good use of visual materials to illustrate the points they are making. Key points are effectively reinforced.  The lessons observed were all at least good, and in some cases outstanding.  Good use is made of information and communications technology in lessons.  Individual targets are set for science and progress is regularly reviewed against these.

p.1

Quality of the curriculum

The quality of the curriculum in science is good.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

 The range of courses offered at Key Stage 4 meets the needs of most students. Courses include core science (over one or two years), additional science, and triple science (physics, chemistry and biology).  There is a good range of enrichment activities in science, including events such as the ‘Whizz Bang Show’, which students particularly enjoy.  In keeping with the school’s specialist sports status there are effective and productive links with the PE department. For example, both departments contribute to the Year 7 ‘My Body’ project.  The science department makes a good contribution to ‘healthy schools’ work.

p.2

Leadership and management

 Day-to-day operational management is very effective.  The introduction of the new GCSE courses has been very well managed.  There is a clear management focus on raising achievement.  The head of department carries out thorough analyses of attainment and progress data and uses these to identify areas for development.  A range of strategies has been implemented to raise achievement at Key Stage 3, with some success over the period 2005 to 2007.  Departmental documentation is thorough and comprehensive.  There is effective staff teamwork and sharing of teaching and learning ideas.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 developing more differentiation strategies, especially in mixed ability classes, to help raise achievement further  encouraging more independent learning in lessons to ensure that students think about and apply their knowledge, for example in planning investigations  further developing strategies to involve students more in assessing and taking responsibility for their own learning.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop science in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your Local Authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion