Other · Ofsted letter
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Ruth James
- Postcode verified
BL6 6HW
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Day-to-day operational management is very effective. p.2
- Teachers explain concepts very well, and they make good use of visual materials to illustrate the points they are making. p.1
- The lessons observed were all at least good, and in some cases outstanding. p.1
- The introduction of the new GCSE courses has been very well managed. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop science in the school. p.3
- As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your Local Authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. p.3
- It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance2
“Day-to-day operational management is very effective.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 538
- shorter than usual (typical 963)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Mr L Conley Headteacher St Joseph's RC High School and Sports College Chorley New Road Horwich Bolton Lancashire BL6 6HW
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science
Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 23-24 September to look at work in science.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science
The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: analysis of data, interviews with staff and learners, scrutiny of relevant documentation, students’ work and observation of lessons.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science
The overall effectiveness of science was judged to be good.
p.1
Achievement and standards
Standards are above average and achievement is good.
p.1
Achievement and standards
The proportions of students gaining GCSE grades A*-C in science subjects are significantly above national averages. In national tests at Key Stage 3 in 2007 close to 90% of the students attained the expected Level 5 and over half attained above the expected level. Overall students make good progress in science during their time at the school. Students’ behaviour is very good.
p.1
Quality of teaching and learning
Teaching and learning in science are good. Teachers are committed, hard working and enthusiastic. Relationships between students and teachers are good, and this encourages productive interactions in lessons which promote learning. Learning materials such as worksheets are well presented and effective. Some effective use of question and answer was observed. A variety of activities is used in lessons to engage interest, motivate and develop understanding. Teachers’ expositions are particularly clear. Teachers explain concepts very well, and they make good use of visual materials to illustrate the points they are making. Key points are effectively reinforced. The lessons observed were all at least good, and in some cases outstanding. Good use is made of information and communications technology in lessons. Individual targets are set for science and progress is regularly reviewed against these.
p.1
Quality of the curriculum
The quality of the curriculum in science is good.
p.2
Quality of the curriculum
The range of courses offered at Key Stage 4 meets the needs of most students. Courses include core science (over one or two years), additional science, and triple science (physics, chemistry and biology). There is a good range of enrichment activities in science, including events such as the ‘Whizz Bang Show’, which students particularly enjoy. In keeping with the school’s specialist sports status there are effective and productive links with the PE department. For example, both departments contribute to the Year 7 ‘My Body’ project. The science department makes a good contribution to ‘healthy schools’ work.
p.2
Leadership and management
Day-to-day operational management is very effective. The introduction of the new GCSE courses has been very well managed. There is a clear management focus on raising achievement. The head of department carries out thorough analyses of attainment and progress data and uses these to identify areas for development. A range of strategies has been implemented to raise achievement at Key Stage 3, with some success over the period 2005 to 2007. Departmental documentation is thorough and comprehensive. There is effective staff teamwork and sharing of teaching and learning ideas.
p.2
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
developing more differentiation strategies, especially in mixed ability classes, to help raise achievement further encouraging more independent learning in lessons to ensure that students think about and apply their knowledge, for example in planning investigations further developing strategies to involve students more in assessing and taking responsibility for their own learning.
p.2
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop science in the school.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your Local Authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion