Other · Ofsted letter
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Ian Richardson
- Postcode verified
WA7 3HB
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The subject is exceptionally well organised and teachers feel very well supported and guided by the subject leader. p.3
- You have generated a climate for strong innovation and coherent planning, within which science is flourishing. p.3
- The quality of teaching and learning is outstanding overall. p.2
- The teaching seen was at least good and much was outstanding. p.2
- The skill and enthusiasm of teachers promotes high levels of engagement and enjoyment. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop science in the school. p.3
- As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. p.3
- It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes4
“Assessment is thorough and pupils’ progress is effectively monitored.” p.2Leadership & governance2
“Leadership and management of science are outstanding.” p.3Personal development2
“Their personal development is good as is their behaviour.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 729
- shorter than usual (typical 963)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Mrs S Abrahams Headteacher Hillview Primary School Beechwood Avenue Beechwood East Runcorn, Cheshire WA7 3HB
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science
Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 16 October to look at work in science.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science
As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of science, the visit had a particular focus on transition within and between phases; the range of learning experiences; the status and use of SC1.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science
The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with you and the science subject leader, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of parts of three lessons.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science
The overall effectiveness of science was judged to be good with some outstanding features.
p.1
Achievement and standards
Standards are above the national average. Achievement is good overall.
p.1
Achievement and standards
Standards at the end of Key Stage 2 have been above national average overall for the three years 2005-2007 from the last set of validated data. In 2006 standards were significantly above average. Disruption to teaching from 2006 has contributed to a decline in standards attained in subsequent years. The progress that pupils make is good. The scrutiny of their work and observation of lessons showed that they are working above levels expected for their age. Pupils are demonstrating understanding of science and well developed science skills that they are using to solve problems. Pupils work well whether in class, in groups, individually and independently. They take on responsibilities and roles readily. Their personal development is good as is their behaviour. As part of the creative curriculum the pupils are responding positively to the greater opportunities provided to transfer skills to new areas of
p.1
Achievement and standards
knowledge. Pupils’ skills of scientific enquiry are well developed. They are working with confidence and are very willing to offer ideas and answers to questions.
p.2
Quality of teaching and learning of science
The quality of teaching and learning is outstanding overall.
p.2
Quality of teaching and learning of science
The teaching seen was at least good and much was outstanding. The skill and enthusiasm of teachers promotes high levels of engagement and enjoyment. No examples of off task activity were seen in lessons. Teachers expect pupils to be active, to take decisions, plan, contribute to discussions and offer ideas such as predictions and what constitutes a fair test in science. The resources used by teachers are of high quality and their use of information communication technology (ICT) enhances the teaching and learning well, making it possible for pupils to benefit from good stimulus material and to interact with ideas using ICT. Teachers’ planning is very good, well matched to individual needs and much of the work is set in contexts that are relevant to pupils. The planning model ensures that knowledge and skills in science are developed along with other key skills and with clear relevant links to other subject areas.
p.2
Quality of teaching and learning of science
Assessment is thorough and pupils’ progress is effectively monitored. The monitoring identifies individual needs and leads to changes in the planning for pupils. Assessment for learning techniques are well deployed to promote pupils’ learning.
p.2
Quality of the curriculum
You have adopted a model for the creative curriculum. This is well understood and put into practice by teachers. The curriculum model is promoting good development of skills and greater enjoyment for pupils and teachers. The coverage of the National Curriculum is secured by thorough audit of planning against the qualifications and curriculum authority (QCA) scheme of work. A clear priority of teachers is for pupils to study science in relevant contexts and to ensure engaging experiences and the use of the skills of scientific enquiry. Pupils are very positive about how this helps them to learn effectively. The curriculum is enriched and extended by visits out of school, visitors to school, such as the Quantum Theatre, and extracurricular clubs such as the Eco-club.
p.2
Leadership and management of science
Leadership and management of science are outstanding.
p.3
Leadership and management of science
You have generated a climate for strong innovation and coherent planning, within which science is flourishing. There is thorough monitoring of standards and progress made by pupils that enables the needs of individuals to be met. Planning is effectively monitored and very good efforts made to provide pupils with a continuum of learning experiences. Scrutiny of pupils’ work, observation and evaluation of teaching, canvassing learners’ views, careful analysis of performance data, all contribute to an accurate self evaluation of the work in science. The subject is exceptionally well organised and teachers feel very well supported and guided by the subject leader. Day to day management is of a very high standards and policies and documentation supporting coherent practice and very good communication are in place.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
ensuring access to high quality and relevant continuing professional development in science for staff.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop science in the school.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion