Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 20 Nov 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Ian Richardson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ian Richardson

  • Postcode verified

    WA7 3HB

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+81Very positivemore positive than 95% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandinghigh qualityeffectivelyexceptionallyenjoymentflourishingvery wellstrong
Criticismdisruptiondecline

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings543w+67
  • Leadership137w+87
  • What needs to improve70w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
729
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 60%Leadership 15%What needs to improve 8%About the inspection 18%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs S Abrahams Headteacher Hillview Primary School Beechwood Avenue Beechwood East Runcorn, Cheshire WA7 3HB

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 16 October to look at work in science.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of science, the visit had a particular focus on transition within and between phases; the range of learning experiences; the status and use of SC1.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with you and the science subject leader, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of parts of three lessons.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science

The overall effectiveness of science was judged to be good with some outstanding features.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Standards are above the national average. Achievement is good overall.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Standards at the end of Key Stage 2 have been above national average overall for the three years 2005-2007 from the last set of validated data. In 2006 standards were significantly above average. Disruption to teaching from 2006 has contributed to a decline in standards attained in subsequent years.  The progress that pupils make is good. The scrutiny of their work and observation of lessons showed that they are working above levels expected for their age.  Pupils are demonstrating understanding of science and well developed science skills that they are using to solve problems.  Pupils work well whether in class, in groups, individually and independently. They take on responsibilities and roles readily. Their personal development is good as is their behaviour.  As part of the creative curriculum the pupils are responding positively to the greater opportunities provided to transfer skills to new areas of

p.1

Achievement and standards

knowledge.  Pupils’ skills of scientific enquiry are well developed. They are working with confidence and are very willing to offer ideas and answers to questions.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of science

The quality of teaching and learning is outstanding overall.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of science

 The teaching seen was at least good and much was outstanding. The skill and enthusiasm of teachers promotes high levels of engagement and enjoyment. No examples of off task activity were seen in lessons.  Teachers expect pupils to be active, to take decisions, plan, contribute to discussions and offer ideas such as predictions and what constitutes a fair test in science.  The resources used by teachers are of high quality and their use of information communication technology (ICT) enhances the teaching and learning well, making it possible for pupils to benefit from good stimulus material and to interact with ideas using ICT.  Teachers’ planning is very good, well matched to individual needs and much of the work is set in contexts that are relevant to pupils. The planning model ensures that knowledge and skills in science are developed along with other key skills and with clear relevant links to other subject areas.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of science

 Assessment is thorough and pupils’ progress is effectively monitored. The monitoring identifies individual needs and leads to changes in the planning for pupils. Assessment for learning techniques are well deployed to promote pupils’ learning.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

 You have adopted a model for the creative curriculum. This is well understood and put into practice by teachers. The curriculum model is promoting good development of skills and greater enjoyment for pupils and teachers.  The coverage of the National Curriculum is secured by thorough audit of planning against the qualifications and curriculum authority (QCA) scheme of work. A clear priority of teachers is for pupils to study science in relevant contexts and to ensure engaging experiences and the use of the skills of scientific enquiry. Pupils are very positive about how this helps them to learn effectively.  The curriculum is enriched and extended by visits out of school, visitors to school, such as the Quantum Theatre, and extracurricular clubs such as the Eco-club.

p.2

Leadership and management of science

Leadership and management of science are outstanding.

p.3

Leadership and management of science

 You have generated a climate for strong innovation and coherent planning, within which science is flourishing.  There is thorough monitoring of standards and progress made by pupils that enables the needs of individuals to be met.  Planning is effectively monitored and very good efforts made to provide pupils with a continuum of learning experiences.  Scrutiny of pupils’ work, observation and evaluation of teaching, canvassing learners’ views, careful analysis of performance data, all contribute to an accurate self evaluation of the work in science.  The subject is exceptionally well organised and teachers feel very well supported and guided by the subject leader. Day to day management is of a very high standards and policies and documentation supporting coherent practice and very good communication are in place.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 ensuring access to high quality and relevant continuing professional development in science for staff.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop science in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion