Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 31 Oct 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Davinder Dosanjh

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Davinder Dosanjh

  • Postcode verified

    WV14 0LT

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+84Very positivemore positive than 96% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisevery effectiveengagingwell plannedrobusteffectivepositiveclearkind

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings523w+84
  • What needs to improve84w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
596
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 86%What needs to improve 14%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Miss E Smith Headteacher Bilston Nursery School Early Excellence Centre Wolverhampton Street Bilston West Midlands WV14 0LT

p.1

Development (CPD)

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 29 September to look at work in CPD.

p.1

Development (CPD)

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of CPD the visit had a particular focus on how professional development activities impact on raising standards and achievement.

p.1

Development (CPD)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text.

p.1

Development (CPD)

The evidence used to inform the judgement about the overall effectiveness of CPD included interviews with senior managers and staff, scrutiny of relevant documentation and the short observation of one nursery session.

p.1

Development (CPD)

The overall effectiveness of CPD was judged to be good.

p.1

The strengths identified

 You set a clear direction for the centre and have introduced a wide range of strategies to improve the quality of provision for children and families.  The process for identifying the nursery school’s priorities and addressing them in the school improvement plan are robust. The improvement plan also identifies priorities for the whole centre. There is a good focus on resource implications and staff development in the plan.  Very detailed planning and training on the Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) has already taken place to prepare staff for the changes in September 2008.  A comprehensive CPD policy ensures CPD is well planned to support the priorities of the school and individual staff. The school provides a good range of internal and external CPD. Many staff have been supported to achieve an NVQ level 4 and they confirm that their professional development needs are fully met.  A very effective whole day training took place in September 2008 for the

p.1

The strengths identified

entire centre. This was the first of its kind. It has helped to improve communication between teams at the centre with colleagues sharing information and seeking advice and support from other teams. As a result the centre is able to offer more effective support for children and families.  The recently introduced approach to establishing the cost effectiveness of training is very useful; ensuring each training event has a CPD cost effectiveness record. This identifies all costs incurred (travel, course cost, cover, expenses) and a staff feedback rating.  You have some good systems in place for evaluating the impact of CPD. A monitoring timetable for the year outlines the focus of activities. Four monitoring visits have taken place in the nursery school between January 2008 and September 2008, the evidence from which shows the positive impact of changes and training. The environment is now more colourful

p.2

The strengths identified

and engaging for children. Resources are easily accessible for children to use independently and children are making choices about their learning even at this early stage of the term. There is a good combination of teacher directed and self-directed activity. Planned activities are engaging children.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 monitor the new performance management procedures for non-teaching staff and the quality of targets and objectives being set  make more systematic use of peer coaching and mentoring.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop CPD in the school.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion