Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 31 Dec 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Gehane Gordelier

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Gehane Gordelier

  • Postcode verified

    OX28 5FZ

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+61Positivemore positive than 87% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisehigh qualityvery welleffectivelyimprovedconfidentenjoyeffectivewell planned
Criticismnot alwaysnot sufficientlymissednot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1030w+50
  • Leadership328w+75
  • What needs to improve97w+56

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,424
longer than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 48
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 71%Leadership 23%What needs to improve 7%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr M Bartleman Headteacher West Witney Primary School Edington Road Witney Oxfordshire OX28 5FZ

p.1

Communication technology (ICT)

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 5 November 2008 to look at work in ICT. As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on the quality of assessment.

p.1

Communication technology (ICT)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Communication technology (ICT)

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included discussions with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of two part lessons.

p.1

Communication technology (ICT)

The overall effectiveness of ICT was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement and standards in ICT

Achievement in ICT is good and standards are above average by the end of Year 6.

p.1

Achievement and standards in ICT

 Although improving rapidly, pupils make better progress in ICT at Key Stage 2 than at Key Stage 1 and in the Foundation Stage.  ICT contributes well to raising standards in literacy, but is not used as well as it could be to help raise standards in other subjects.  ICT contributes very well to pupils’ personal development and well- being. Pupils can access a wide range of information, which contributes well to their knowledge and understanding of the world as well their local environment. They know about the importance of not sharing personal information and how to use the internet safely.  Pupils, including those with learning difficulties and disabilities and with a statement of special educational need, are helped to feel proud of what they can achieve in their work as a result of using ICT. This also contributes significantly to raising their self-esteem.  ICT contributes very effectively to pupils learning to share and work

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning of ICT

The quality of teaching and learning of ICT is good and have improved significantly in the last two years.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of ICT

 Teaching and support staff have benefited enormously from high quality training tailored to meet their needs as well as opportunities to share and disseminate good practice. As a result, they are more confident and competent in their use of ICT and make good use of interactive whiteboards to enhance learning.  ICT lessons are well planned and include an appropriate range of activities to meet the needs of pupils with different abilities.  In the lessons observed, the teachers’ passion for ICT was infectious. They planned activities, which they knew their pupils would enjoy, and demonstrated new learning in a fun and exciting way. As a result pupils engaged enthusiastically and remained focused and on task. Teachers made effective use of mini plenaries during the course of a lesson to help refocus pupils on the key learning objectives. This helped to maintain a rapid pace of learning leading to good progress.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of ICT

In a Year 3/4 lesson, the teacher pretended to recruit the pupils as police officers. Pupils thoroughly enjoyed using a database and doing searches to help solve some crimes. The activities fired the imagination of the pupils and made them eager to undertake their learning.  However, some aspects of teaching are less effective; for example, key vocabulary in ICT is not always taught or reinforced in a way that encourages pupils use the correct terminology when they talk about their work.  Teachers mark pupils work diligently against learning objectives. This helps pupils to recognise when they have done well and what they could do to further improve. However, teachers are not all sufficiently familiar with level descriptors and this at times causes some teachers to be over generous in their assessment of pupils’ abilities. Furthermore, the use of assessment to support learning during lessons is not sufficiently well embedded.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of ICT

 Pupils benefit from opportunities to make choices about how to support their own learning. This helps them to become increasingly independent in their use of ICT. Pupils state they would welcome more access to ICT during class based lessons.  Teaching assistants provide good support to some of the most vulnerable pupils. They encourage pupils to be reflective and make use of what they already know, and when needed provide them with additional guidance. This helps to ensure these pupils participate fully and progress as well as their peers.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum for ICT

The quality of the curriculum for ICT is good.

p.3

Quality of the curriculum for ICT

 ICT is taught through a creative and integrated curriculum. This places learning in a meaningful and purposeful context. Some good examples were seen at Key Stage 2. In one class, pupils were learning to use a spreadsheet to work out the total cost of fire works or a camping trip.  All pupils receive their statutory National Curriculum entitlement. There is especially good provision for data logging and data handling and the school has recently improved the programme of work for teaching pupils about control technology.  The quality of the ICT curriculum contributes significantly to the enjoyment of pupils’ learning. This is because pupils appreciate the high quality of visual images and animation; they can access and retrieve work and information with ease and they enjoy interacting with technology at their own pace and in a way that is specifically tailored to their needs.  There is clear guidance about progression in skills, understanding and

p.3

Quality of the curriculum for ICT

knowledge; however, the school recognises that pupils are increasingly achieving more than is planned for.  There are good links between ICT and other subjects in ICT based lessons. However, the reverse is not always true. This is leading to missed opportunities of using ICT to help raise standards in other subject areas, especially in the foundation subjects.  The Primary National Strategy has helped to significantly increase the use of ICT in English. This has led to some very creative use of ICT by staff as well as pupils including the creation of film clips, radio shows and virtual tours of the school.

p.3

Leadership and management of ICT

The quality of leadership and management of ICT is good.

p.3

Leadership and management of ICT

 You are currently the interim leader and manager for ICT. Your passion for ICT is helping to drive up standards. You have ensured that staff all receive the training they require and have worked well with the governing body to ensure the school is equipped with technology that is fit for purpose.  You have made very good use of a self-review tool to inform the action plan and to affirm priority areas. This has ensured that you have an accurate view of the strengths and areas for improvement.  Governors are very supportive of ICT developments and ensure that expenses represent good value for money. There is a link governor and governors are kept informed about standards and progress in ICT.  Although all subject leaders have ICT included within their remit, they do not all take sufficient account of the difference ICT is making within their subject.  You recognise the need to develop the role of the new ICT co-ordinator

p.3

Leadership and management of ICT

when she takes up her post.  Technical support is used effectively; this has helped teachers to become more confident to experiment with new technology.  The school is currently piloting the use of a virtual learning environment and all staff have received training.

p.3

Use of Assessment

The use of assessment in ICT is good overall.

p.4

Use of Assessment

 The school tracks and monitors the progress made by all pupils. This information is used particularly well at Key Stage 2 to identify pupils in need of additional support.  Teachers are not all sufficiently familiar with the level descriptors and this at times leads to their assessment of pupils’ work being overly generous.  Teachers make effective use of assessment information to inform their planning and to help pupils know from one lesson to the next what they need to do to improve.  Older pupils are not all sufficiently aware of the level at which they are working.

p.4

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 ensuring that pupils make good progress in all year groups, particularly in the Foundation Stage and at Key Stage 1  ensuring consistently good use of assessment strategies during lessons to help pupils make even better progress on a day-to-day basis.

p.4

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop ICT in the school.

p.4

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion