Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 23 Jan 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Rob McKeown

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Rob McKeown

  • Postcode verified

    AL1 2LE

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+72Very positivemore positive than 92% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentmake good progressstrongstrengthsvery welloutstandinghigh qualitysuccessfully
Criticismweaknessesinsufficientbelowvariationlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings665w+71
  • Leadership277w+62
  • What needs to improve115w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,045
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 48
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 55%Leadership 23%What needs to improve 9%About the inspection 13%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 0207 421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs A Godfrey Headteacher Mandeville Primary School Mandeville Drive St Albans Hertfordshire AL1 2LE

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – physical education

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 03 December 2008 to look at work in physical education (PE).

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – physical education

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on assessing the PE contribution to the outcomes of Every Child Matters (ECM) particularly ‘being healthy’.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – physical education

The visit provided valuable information, which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – physical education

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ reports, observation of two lessons and a range of other physical activities.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – physical education

The overall effectiveness of physical education was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Children start school with physical skills that are well below expected levels. They make good progress through the Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) because an excellent range of activities is provided to help develop their fine and gross motor skills. Progress for pupils in Key Stages 1 and 2 continues to be good, so that by the time pupils leave in Year 6, a majority are working at the level expected for their age. Progress in swimming is good for many pupils but standards are below average. The ‘top up’ swimming programme was used successfully last year to help a group of year 6 pupils to become stronger swimmers. The many opportunities pupils have to engage in purposeful physical activities at lunchtime are helping to boost their achievement.  Detailed records of progress are kept for children in the EYFS but the attainment and progress of pupils in Keys Stages 1 and 2 are not recorded systematically. Consequently the subject leaders’ views of progress are not

p.1

Achievement and standards

easily substantiated. There is a wide variation in pupils’ physical ability across each year group. Programmes such as the multi skills extension club for talented pupils, speed stacking and the speed agility quickness (SAQ) club, organised through the sports partnership, help to meet individual needs.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of PE

The quality of teaching and learning is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of PE

 There were a number of strengths in the lessons observed during the inspection. A suitable lesson structure is in place with all four strands of the PE programme included. Pupils warm up at the start and they are encouraged to discuss the impact that this has on their bodies. At the start of the lesson in Year 3, the teacher used information communication technology (ICT) well to show pupils what they should be aiming for in their own gymnastics responses. Teachers’ strong subject knowledge, helpful modelling and effective coaching helped pupils in Years 5 and 6 to make good progress in acquiring basic rugby skills. The team teaching arrangement matched to pupils’ abilities was another successful feature.  Teachers assess pupils’ learning well during lessons by observing their responses and commenting on how they might improve. In the Year 3 lesson the teaching assistant kept a record of children’ learning outcomes.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of PE

Teachers in Years 5 and 6 were adept at identifying the next steps needed to move pupils’ learning on. At the moment there is no formal system for assessing pupils’ attainment in PE at the end of units of work. Reports written for parents of children in the EYFS are detailed and closely matched to children’s achievements. The reports seen from Key Stage 1 and 2 were less detailed and not as informative.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

 All classes have two hours of timetabled PE and regular ‘take ten’ sessions. Many pupils also take part in physical activities at lunchtime. A published scheme of work is used to guide teachers’ medium term planning and all areas of learning are covered through the year. Older pupils take part in outdoor and adventurous activities when attending residential study visits. The subject leaders acknowledge that the curriculum map for PE requires revision to show when each area of learning is taught in each year group.  The activities led by the sports coach at lunchtime supplement curricular provision very well. Older pupils also have the chance to take part in festivals, tournaments and inter-school matches in a range of sports. Pupils have been introduced to new activities, such as ‘try-golf’, through the sports partnership network, and ‘circus skills’ as part of the International Primary Curriculum programme. Some sports clubs are

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

provided after school but despite support and encouragement from the school, attendance is often very low. Additional activities are also organised through the extended schools programme but the coordinator would like to attract more pupils from Mandeville to these.

p.3

Leadership and management of PE

The quality of leadership and management is good.

p.3

Leadership and management of PE

 There is a very strong commitment from senior leaders for establishing high quality provision and achieving positive outcomes for pupils. For example, the appointment of a specialist coach to lead activities at lunchtime and the allocation of funding to improve the play environment and increase pupils’ participation rates in physical activities. The current and future subject leaders provide good role models and respond positively to their colleagues’ requests for guidance and support. Their subject evaluation clearly indicates the strengths and weaknesses in provision and what requires further improvement.  Good use has been made of the school sports partnership link to strengthen subject leadership. Professional development courses have been organised to help improve teachers’ subject knowledge. However, insufficient time is allocated to monitoring and evaluation through lesson observations and making checks on pupils’ progress. Subject leaders also

p.3

Leadership and management of PE

acknowledge that the organisation of intra-school competitions would help increase pupils’ participation in competitive sport.

p.3

Matters particularly being healthy

 Provision in PE makes a good contribution to pupils’ outstanding personal development and well-being. Pupils enjoy taking part in physical activities and their behaviour and attitudes in lessons are very good. The pupils I met knew that their involvement in PE and sport was helping to keep them fit and healthy. They could talk about what happens to their bodies when they exercise and how other choices, such as eating a balanced diet, contribute to their overall well-being. Pupils regular ‘take ten’ sessions and lunchtime activities are contributing well to improving their physical skills, coordination and fitness. There are excellent opportunities for older pupils to take responsibility and show leadership as play-leaders and ‘hut heroes’.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 consider establishing a workable system for assessing and recording pupils’ progress in PE, so that the subject leader is able to judge pupils’ achievement more accurately;  strengthen subject leader monitoring and evaluation through scheduling regular lesson observations;  continue to find ways to increase pupils’ participation in sports clubs and competitions during and after the school day. I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop physical education in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion