Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 14 Nov 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Subject Adviser (lead), Gina White

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Gina White, Subject Adviser

  • Postcode verified

    LE5 6AD

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+40Positivemore positive than 45% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseconfidenteffectivelymake good progressstrongenthusiasticenthusiasmeffectiveconfidently
Criticismweaknesseslacknot sufficientlygaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings473w+47
  • Leadership84w+23
  • What needs to improve114w−20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
656
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
16%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 60%Leadership 11%What needs to improve 14%About the inspection 15%

Full report text

Mr Z Mohamed Headteacher Linden Primary School Evington Leicester LE5 6AD

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visit on 14 October to look at work in Design and Technology (D&T).

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and learners, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of students’ work and observation of three lessons.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology

The overall effectiveness of D&T was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Achievement and standards overall are good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Pupils achieve above average expectations for their age and make good progress in acquiring and using subject language. Pupils know and understand a wide range of specialist terms such as levers, cams and prototype. By the end of Key Stage 2 pupils are confident in using tools and equipment safely, solving problems and taking decisions. Most pupils use practical skills satisfactorily to make working models and describe in detail how they made their products.  Pupils’ personal development is good. Pupils are enthusiastic learners, willingly discuss their work, share their ideas with partners and act responsibly and safely in lessons. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning of D&T

The quality of teaching and learning overall is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of D&T

 Teaching is lively and pupils have an enthusiasm for learning. Teachers use subject language and questioning techniques effectively to ensure pupils understand activities. The consistent emphasis on discussion and sharing of ideas with partners supports pupils at early stages of learning English. Pupils gain much from this strategy: they say it helps them to develop and refine their ideas. Some pupils are beginning to develop unusual ideas and apply them to design and make moving vehicles, bags and bridges.  In some lessons teachers lack sufficient depth and breadth of subject knowledge to extend pupils’ learning and to challenge the most able learners.  Assessment of pupils D&T capability is under-developed. Pupils’ work is discussed and commented upon but teachers do not make sufficient use of such information to guide their next steps when planning lessons to ensure common misconceptions and gaps in pupils’

p.2

Quality of the D&T curriculum

 The curriculum meets requirements; opportunities to cook and to use electronic components, structures and mechanisms are firmly embedded. Pupils work in a wide range of contexts to solve problems, often designing products for family members and different clients. Pupils research, test and evaluate their products in an integrated way and older pupils are beginning to work independently to design and make.  Pupils have a good understanding of the relevance of D&T to their lives. This is underpinned through visits and opportunities to apply their designing and making skills to solve real problems such as redesigning parts of the school grounds.  Some pupils respond with unusual ideas, although not all staff recognise this creative thinking or know how to support more pupils to do this.

p.2

Leadership and management of D&T

Leadership and management of the subject are good.

p.2

Leadership and management of D&T

 You provide effective support for the subject; school systems to regularly review D&T effectively informs self-evaluation and underpins significant curriculum development.  Good use is made of the subject leader’s expertise to support teachers in using tools and equipment confidently and safely and to inform curriculum development. However, monitoring and evaluation, whilst rooted in informal approaches, is not sufficiently systematic to identify where some teachers need further support to make learning challenging for all learners.

p.2

The extent to which inequality and stereotyping are tackled in D&T:

 Boys achieve as well as girls in D&T. Boys are confident learners and often come up with unusual ideas. Learning strategies place a strong emphasis on practical approaches to solving problems, enabling pupils to find out through trial and error and this supports their good achievement.  There is no evidence of stereotyping taking place in D&T.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 developing teachers’ subject knowledge to ensure all learners, particularly the most able, are suitably challenged  ensuring monitoring and evaluation are rigorously embedded to identify the impact of curriculum changes and to inform further developments  extending assessment processes to enable teachers to better identify pupils’ strengths and weaknesses and to use the information more precisely to meet individual needs.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop D&T in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As explained in the previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion