Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 25 Feb 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Tribal Group (lead), Mary Massey, Peter Kemble

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Mary Massey, Peter Kemble, Tribal Group

  • Postcode verified

    EX4 8NN

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+53Positivemore positive than 52% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexceptionalgood progressoutstandingeffectiveconsistentlyeffectivelyimprovedconfident
Criticisminadequatenot yetbelowtoo lowinsufficientlyabsencelimitedyet to

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1240w+53
  • Leadership561w+46
  • What needs to improve23w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,821
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%Leadership 31%What needs to improve 1%

Full report text

Mrs Gill Winston The Acting Headteacher Willowbrook School Summer Lane Beacon Heath Exeter Devon EX4 8NN

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Willowbrook School

Following my visit with Peter Kemble, Additional Inspector, to your school on 10 and 11 February, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector to confirm the inspection findings.

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Willowbrook School

The visit was the second monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures in March 2008. The monitoring inspection report is attached and the main judgements are set out below.

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Willowbrook School

Progress since being subject to special measures – satisfactory.

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Willowbrook School

Progress since previous monitoring inspection – good.

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Willowbrook School

Newly qualified teachers may not be appointed.

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Willowbrook School

This letter and monitoring inspection report will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Willowbrook School

I am copying this letter and the monitoring inspection report to the Secretary of State, the chair of governors and the Director of Children’s Services for Devon.

p.1

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Tribal Group 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0845 123 6001 F 0845 123 6002 T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Page 2

p.1

Evidence

Inspectors observed the school’s work, scrutinised documents and met with the acting headteacher, teaching and support staff, groups of pupils and parents, and two governors including the chair. A visit was made to the behaviour unit at St James’ School and a telephone conversation was held with a representative from the local authority.

p.2

Context

Since the last monitoring visit the headteacher has resigned. A new acting headteacher took up post on 1 November. After the resignation of the chair of governors, a new chair of governors was appointed on 3 February. Two governors have resigned and two new appointments have been made. A new teacher for Year 4 has been appointed on a temporary contract until the end of the summer term.

p.2

Achievement and standards

Assessment data is now used consistently in teachers’ daily planning and in lessons to ensure that work is effectively matched to pupils’ needs, although the level of challenge provided by teachers is greater in Years 1 and 2. This is already beginning to have an impact on standards in the lower school. Pupils in Years 1 and 2 are now making outstanding progress in reading and good progress in writing and mathematics. Standards are now satisfactory. Data from 2008 show that pupils at Key Stage 1 made significantly greater progress than pupils in similar schools. At Key Stage 2, standards remain inadequate. However, pupils are making satisfactory progress in gaining lost ground. Children in the Early Years Foundation Stage are making good progress, particularly in developing communication, language and literacy skills, which are low on entry. The relatively high proportion of pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities are making similar progress to their

p.2

Achievement and standards

classmates. Some individual pupils, both in the main school and in the early years support centre, have made exceptional progress because effective management of behaviour has improved both their attitudes and achievement. Properly managed procedures for supporting and monitoring the progress of pupils who are at the early stages of learning English are now in place but not yet fully embedded. With very good support from class teachers and teaching assistants, these pupils are making satisfactory progress overall, with some making good progress.

p.2

Achievement and standards

Progress since the last visit on the areas for improvement:  raise standards by ensuring teachers use assessment information consistently to provide suitable challenge for pupils – good. Page 3

p.2

Personal development and well-being

During this visit, inspectors were impressed by the very calm and purposeful atmosphere in school. Children of all ages are happy, have very positive attitudes to their learning and treat one another and the staff with respect. They play safely and cooperatively, with older pupils aware of the need to support and look after younger ones. In assembly, the high quality and sincerity of pupils’ singing demonstrated how much they enjoy and value the opportunity to share music together, and staff provided clear moral and social messages and allowed time for reflection. Exclusions have reduced as result of using the behaviour unit at St James’ School as an extra resource. Pupils report that this has made a real difference to their behaviour and to the quality of learning in classrooms. New methods for rewarding pupils for hard work and good behaviour, particularly the ‘Learn to Earn’ system in Year 6, have

p.3

Personal development and well-being

increased pupils’ motivation. The percentage of unauthorised absence and the number of pupils who are persistent non attenders have reduced, particularly for pupils in Years 5 and 6. However, the overall attendance figure is still below the national average and only slowly improving. Attendance in Year 6 is good but it is well below average in the Early Years Foundation Stage. Procedures for monitoring attendance are much improved, including calling parents on the first day of absence, stronger links with the education welfare officer, and more regular conversations with parents.

p.3

Quality of provision

The curriculum is now more balanced. Pupils were consulted about alterations to the curriculum. They asked for more first hand experiences, practical activities in the classroom, trips and visits, group work and creative activities such as art and music. Although some of these plans have been implemented, some changes cannot be introduced until the next academic year. Literacy, numeracy and information and communication technology (ICT) skills are now considered in planning for foundation subjects, but still need to be embedded further, particularly at Key Stage 2. The progress made in introducing appropriate ICT experiences for pupils has been particularly rapid and has involved improving both resources and staff skills. A new ICT suite is now functioning, but software is still limited and the ratio of computers to pupils is still too low. Technical support is provided from St James’ School, and a

p.3

Quality of provision

teaching assistant on the staff is supporting teachers in developing their skills. Ambitious plans for a new outdoor area for the Early Years Foundation Stage are in hand and negotiations for the necessary funding are taking place with the local authority.

p.3

Quality of provision

Teaching and learning are now good across the school, with some outstanding practice. Coaching and support are in place in order to help improve further the small amount of satisfactory teaching that remains. This improvement is largely a result of more thorough, individualised planning based on assessment data, and effective marking and feedback to pupils. The introduction of education plans to meet the needs of groups of pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities has made it easier for teachers to match work to need, and a strong team of skilled Page 4 teaching assistants support these pupils very effectively. Pupils have welcomed teachers identifying individual ‘next steps’ for each of them so they know exactly what they need to do in order to improve. Work is now assessed regularly and teachers are confident in levelling it accurately. The use of ICT by teachers in classrooms has developed well since the last monitoring visit. All teachers now have

p.3

Quality of provision

laptops and the interactive whiteboards in every classroom are used well. As a result of better subject leadership, teachers are now more confident in teaching science.

p.4

Quality of provision

Robust safeguarding systems are now in place. All staff have now had the appropriate safeguarding checks, accidents are recorded properly, and risk assessments are undertaken. All staff have been trained in child protection procedures.

p.4

Quality of provision

Progress since the last visit on the areas for improvement:  ensure there is appropriate balance between subjects in the curriculum to provide all pupils with a broad experience of learning – satisfactory.  ensure that procedures for safeguarding pupils meet current government requirements – good.

p.4

Leadership and management

The new acting headteacher took up her post in November 2008 after the last monitoring visit. She has accelerated the pace of change, particularly through the introduction of rigorous procedures to monitor every aspect of the school’s work. Self-evaluation is very accurate and is based on a sound knowledge of the quality of teaching and learning throughout the school. Monitoring procedures include regular lesson observations, scrutiny of teachers’ planning and assessment, and frequent one to one conversations with staff. Senior leaders’ judgements are then checked against the quality of pupils’ work to ensure their accuracy. Subject leaders with job descriptions are now in place for all subjects. This has ensured that long term plans for all the foundation subjects are now available, although in some cases they have yet to be implemented by staff.

p.4

Leadership and management

Teaching and support staff demonstrate exceptional commitment to the school, and this is evident from their very hard work to implement essential changes. They feel very accountable for their work and have had to adjust to new ways of working and regular monitoring. This has meant an increase in workload, but the majority feel that they now have a common sense of direction with a shared vision and purpose. They are beginning to see the impact of changes in their practice on pupils’ attitudes, aspirations, achievement and well-being. The rapid introduction of many new procedures to improve the school’s work has left some support staff feeling that they are insufficiently involved in decision making and that communication with them could be more consistent.

p.4

Leadership and management

Parents’ attendance at family assemblies is good, but fewer attend the curriculum meetings at the school. No parent survey was carried out at this monitoring visit, but inspectors spoke to some parents outside the school. Although some are still Page 5 concerned about the quality of education their children are receiving, particularly at Key Stage 2, the majority that inspectors spoke to felt that there had been improvements at the school in recent months, particularly in terms of leadership and pupils’ behaviour.

p.4

Leadership and management

An experienced new chair of governors was appointed very recently. New governors from the community, including a parent, have joined the governing body. Although these governors still need careful induction and training, they are very enthusiastic about the support they can give the school on its journey out of special measures. Meetings are now more focused and challenging, with governors well aware of the responsibilities they hold. The governing body has not yet consulted parents regularly as agreed in the local authority action plan. The major priority for the governing body in the immediate future is the appointment of a substantive headteacher from September 2009 who has the skills to sustain and continue the improvements already made.

p.5

Leadership and management

Progress since the last visit on the areas for improvement:  improve arrangements for senior leaders to monitor the work of the school so they have a more thorough understanding of the school's performance – good  strengthen the role of the governing body so it can provide effective support and challenge to the school – good.

p.5

External support

The acting headteacher is a member of the local authority’s school improvement service, seconded to the school until August 2009. Her previous successful experience as a primary headteacher and her determination to move the school out of special measures have ensured rapid progress since her appointment in November.

p.5

Priorities for further improvement

 Strengthen relationships with parents and seek their views each term in order to contribute to the local authority’s regular reviews of progress.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion