Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 25 Feb 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Naila Zaffar (lead), Mark Williams

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Mark Williams, Naila Zaffar

  • Postcode verified

    M40 9GN

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+67Positivemore positive than 66% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongpositiveclearimprovedoutstandinghigh qualityinadequatesecure
Criticismtoo fewnot alwaysbelowexclusionsnot swiftly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadership positive critical
  • Findings865w+51
  • Leadership319w+85

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Full report text

PROTECT-INSPECTION

January 2009 PROTECT-INSPECTION Page 1 6 February 2009

p.1

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Mr R Peden Headteacher Moston Fields Primary School Brookside Road Moston Manchester M40 9GN

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Moston Fields Primary School

Following my visit with Ron Bulman and Naila Zaffar, Additional Inspectors, to your school on 4 and 5 February 2009, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector to confirm the inspection findings.

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Moston Fields Primary School

The visit was the third monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures in November 2007. The monitoring inspection report is attached and the main judgements are set out below.

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Moston Fields Primary School

Progress since being subject to special measures – satisfactory

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Moston Fields Primary School

Progress since previous monitoring inspection – good

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Moston Fields Primary School

Newly qualified teachers may be appointed on the condition that they are provided with a high quality programme of induction and support .

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Moston Fields Primary School

I am copying this letter and the monitoring inspection report to the Secretary of State, the chair of governors and the Director of Education for Manchester.

p.1

Her Majesty’s Inspector

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566932 Direct F 01695 729320 hcarnall@cfbt.com

p.1

Evidence

Inspectors investigated the school’s work by observing twenty lessons and scrutinising documents. Meetings were held with the headteacher and deputy headteacher, subject leaders, the Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) leader, and groups of pupils, parents and governors. Inspectors also met with a representative from the local authority (LA) and the school improvement partner (SIP).

p.2

Context

Three teachers new to the school took up their posts in January 2009. Of these, two are working in the EYFS.

p.2

Achievement and standards

Since September 2008 assessments throughout the school have been secure and leaders have had a clear and accurate baseline from which to measure rates of pupil progress. These assessments and work in pupils’ books show that such rates have improved since September and have done so at an accelerated pace for targeted pupils. The best rates of progress have been in writing owing to the strong emphasis in this area over the last year. Overall, progress is approaching satisfactory levels but it is not there yet. This is because some unevenness remains, not least in reading and in Year 3. Nonetheless, leaders are aware of this and actions to overcome the legacy of underachievement are already in place.

p.2

Achievement and standards

Progress since the last visit on the areas for improvement:

p.2

Achievement and standards

 Raise standards in English, mathematics and science in Key Stage 2 and in reading, writing and mathematics in Key Stage 1, and increase the rates of progress for all pupils – satisfactory

p.2

Personal development and well-being

Pupils are orderly around school and cordial in conversation with each other and adults. Good behaviour continues to be the norm as demonstrated by the significant reduction in exclusions and sanctions. Pupils report how much they enjoy the rewards the school provides. Attendance continues to improve and is broadly average.

p.2

Personal development and well-being

Increasingly positive attributes demonstrated by pupils include: their contribution to the school, local and wider communities, as seen in their charitable fundraising; older pupils acting as play buddies; and a growing appreciation of different cultures.

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

PROTECT-INSPECTION Page 3 This was particularly evident during this monitoring visit with pupils enthusiastically finding out about Chinese New Year celebrations following challenges set by the deputy headteacher in assembly. The school council continues to articulate the views of pupils well.

p.3

Quality of provision

Staff have a good understanding of the needs of children in the EYFS based on good, regular observations. Work planned for the children covers all required areas although more could be made of the outdoor learning environment. In addition, children have too few opportunities to work independently rather than completing the same tasks. More able children have been identified but, as yet, they are not moved on swiftly enough in their learning.

p.3

Quality of provision

It is testament to the determination of leaders, staff, governors and LA support that no teaching is inadequate. As a result of training and support in this area the quality of teaching is much improved and, during this monitoring visit, 70% was good or better. Three lessons were judged to be outstanding. Where teaching is satisfactory good elements were observed in nearly all instances. The school is not resting on its laurels. For example, despite improvements in the way work is matched to pupils’ different abilities, it appreciates there is not always enough challenge for the more able pupils. Nonetheless, this good overall improvement, coupled with the good use of teaching assistants has impacted positively on rates of pupil progress.

p.3

Quality of provision

Assessments are secure. Marking is consistent, with pupils rewarded by merits and positive comments. Teachers link their marking to the goals of the lesson well. Leaders know the next step is to ensure marking, where appropriate, identifies to pupils the next steps in their learning and how they can improve. Overall, teachers are increasingly adept at planning work that is appropriate to need and using the wider curriculum to reinforce work in literacy and numeracy.

p.3

Quality of provision

Progress since the last visit on the areas for improvement:

p.3

Quality of provision

 Improve the quality of teaching across the school to increase the proportion of good and better teaching – good  Improve teachers’ knowledge and skills in assessing pupils and using this information to plan lessons better matched to pupils’ abilities – good

p.3

Leadership and management

There have been good improvements in this area since the last visit as evidenced by better rates of pupil progress, accurate assessments and the increased proportion of good and better teaching, including the elimination of that which was unsatisfactory. Support for newly qualified teachers (NQTs) is good. These improvements are the result of the headteacher’s good leadership and the strong, clear direction provided by him and his deputy. The role of core subject leaders in English, mathematics and science has developed further and they have now built up a strong evidence base to

p.3

PROTECT-INSPECTION

PROTECT-INSPECTION Page 4 accurately identify strengths and areas for improvement in their areas. Governance continues to improve at a good pace and governors are carrying out their expected duties and functions more effectively. A positive feature of their work is their meetings with core subject leaders, the level of questions they pose and the increasingly clear way their findings are reported to the governing body. In addition, governors have, in conjunction with the SIP, set appropriate and challenging targets for the headteacher

p.4

PROTECT-INSPECTION

There is much to celebrate in the progress the school has made since the last visit. However, governors and leaders at all levels are aware that recent improvements need to be sustained and built on in order to accelerate pupils’ progress further and raise standards.

p.4

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Progress since the last visit on the areas for improvement:

p.4

PROTECT-INSPECTION

 Improve governance so that governors are able to hold the school to account for the standards it achieves and the rates of pupils’ progress – good  Improve leadership and management at all levels so that the action taken is more effective and consistent in improving pupils’ learning - good

p.4

External support

The LA through its school effectiveness officer and SIP continue to provide good support and challenge to the school. The integrated support plan is clear and coordinated well. In conjunction with the school, NQTs have been supported well.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion