Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 8 Jan 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Dorothy Bathgate

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Dorothy Bathgate

  • Postcode verified

    S43 3LY

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
20
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
—
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 2%About the inspection 98%

Full report text

Miss Jane Burke The Headteacher St Joseph’s Catholic and CofE Primary School (VA) Calver Crescent Staveley Chesterfield Derbyshire S43 3LY

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

Thank you for the help which you, your staff, the chair of governors and local authority advisor gave when I inspected your school on 4 December, for the time you gave to our telephone discussions and for the information which you provided before and during my visit.

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

As a result of the inspection on 21 and 22 November 2007, the school was asked to:

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

 Ensure that the newly formed Governing Body effectively holds the school to account and provides the necessary challenge and leadership. Ensure that a sharp, incisive school development plan drives accountabilities and is monitored frequently.  Make sure that leaders and managers set clear direction in all of their areas of responsibility, with robust systems of monitoring and evaluating in place, accurately informing self-evaluation and leading to whole school improvement.  Improve the quality of the curriculum by adapting work better and including activities to stimulate pupils and improve their thinking skills.  Iron out the differences in teaching and learning across the school so that each child achieves as well as they can and makes consistent progress.

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time the school is making satisfactory progress in addressing the issues for improvement and in raising the pupils’ achievements. Cambridge Education Demeter House Station Road Cambridge CB1 2RS T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01223 578500 Direct F 01223 578501 risp.inspections@camb-ed.com Page 2 The governing body is aware that it did not hold the school sufficiently to account at the time of the last inspection. Governors have reviewed their role and have recognised the need to improve the way they monitor and evaluate the work of the school and the way in which they challenge staff to raise standards They are more closely involved in the school through regular visits and are beginning to gather sufficient information to have a more thorough understanding of the school’s effectiveness. They have developed some sound procedures for checking the

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

school’s work so that they are able to hold the school to account. An appropriate range of training has been undertaken and all governors are well equipped for their roles. The school improvement plan has been revised and now has a sharper focus on improving pupils’ outcomes and is monitored regularly by the governing body.

p.2

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

Satisfactory progress has been made in strengthening the monitoring and evaluating roles of subject leaders. They now conduct regular lesson observations and give focused written feedback on teaching. They also scrutinise pupils’ work and monitor teachers’ planning. However, there is scope for extending the role further to include more robust evaluation of pupils’ learning. All these activities are worthwhile and provide helpful evidence on the quality of provision to inform development planning. Procedures for involving subject leaders and governors in self-evaluation have improved since the last inspection. Consequently, self-evaluation is generally accurate, resulting in a more clearly prioritised development plan. However, there is a tendency to tackle too many issues at once. The present action plans are not sufficiently focused on identifying staff development needs and the steps that need to be taken to improve the quality of teaching and learning.

p.2

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

A satisfactory start has been made to improving the quality of the curriculum. There is appropriate emphasis on teaching the basic skills through a topic based approach, with more flexible use of the timetable. The curriculum is suitably modified to meet the learning needs of lower-attaining pupils and those with learning difficulties. However, more able pupils are too rarely provided with the additional challenge they need or required to work independently so they develop their thinking and problem solving skills. The school is aware of the need to develop a more creative, rich and challenging curriculum and makes effective use of some special events, such as ‘Themed Weeks’, to add interest and enjoyment. Information and communication technology (ICT) resources are being used more widely to develop links between subjects. Although there is some effective use made of interactive white boards, this is not consistent throughout the school.

p.2

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

Satisfactory progress has been made with improving consistency in the quality of teaching and learning. The teaching observed during this visit matched the headteacher’s evaluation and is satisfactory overall. Pupils were generally enthusiastic in lessons although a small number in some classes did not contribute to whole class discussion, lost concentration, and failed to listen carefully enough. Relationships were mostly good. In one good lesson, the teacher inspired pupils through an exciting, whole class shared reading activity. The teacher used good questioning skills to check understanding, as well as impromptu drama moments to bring the story alive. Pupils worked best where they were encouraged to think about Page 3 what they were doing and to make decisions. However, teacher expectations are not high enough in some lessons. An examination of current pupils’ work reveals some variability in the progress being made by higher attaining pupils in different classes,

p.2

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

with the result that not all of these pupils are fulfilling their potential.

p.3

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

I hope that you have found the visit helpful in promoting improvement in your school.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion