Other · Ofsted letter
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Clare Gillies
- Postcode verified
SW18 5TR
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop citizenship in the school. p.3
- As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your Local Authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. p.3
- It will also be available to the team for your next inspection. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Communication & language2
“Teachers encourage pupils to respect different ethnic backgrounds and languages.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 725
- shorter than usual (typical 963)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 13%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Mrs Fiona Morgan Headteacher Sheringdale Primary School Standen Road Southfields London SW18 5TR
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – citizenship
Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 08 July 2008 to look at work in citizenship.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – citizenship
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – citizenship
The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff, pupils and a governor, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of parts of five lessons.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – citizenship
The overall effectiveness of citizenship was judged to be good.
p.1
Achievement and standards
Pupils fully understand the need for rules and have a strong sense of right and wrong. Most classes write their own classroom rules. Recent, continuing improvements to the school grounds and to developing sustainable ways of operating have made all pupils very aware of how their actions impact on the environment. Many older pupils act as playground buddies and help younger pupils with their work. They take on roles of responsibility seriously. The school recently attained Healthy Schools status. The displays about healthy eating in the entrance area are magnificent; pupils have a good knowledge of how to lead healthy lives. The green ‘eco’ group, working towards Silver Eco Award status, is by far the most active sub-group of the school council. The main council, consisting of pupils in Years 5 and 6, does not meet so often. Older pupils are elected to positions of responsibility but in some younger forms pupils
p.1
Achievement and standards
names are pulled out from a hat. This does not foster an understanding of democratic processes although pupils discuss what democracy means in Year 4. Pupils are generous raising funds for local and overseas charities. Their understanding of different types of voluntary organisations is limited. Occasionally, but not often enough, pupils discuss topical issues.
p.2
Quality of teaching and learning of citizenship
The quality of teaching and learning is good.
p.2
Quality of teaching and learning of citizenship
Religious education lessons nurture pupils’ respect for different faiths. A lesson on Judaism was brought to life by photographs of the key features of a synagogue displayed on the interactive whiteboard. Teachers encourage pupils to respect different ethnic backgrounds and languages. Those who do not speak English as their mother tongue gain confidence reading stories in their first language to other children. Pupils who need support developing their social skills or self esteem receive good teaching and guidance. This helps them to gain confidence and develop positive relationships in the school community. Occasionally pupils sit on the carpet for too long and sometimes find it hard to read the interactive whiteboards.
p.2
Quality of the curriculum
Pupils consider the diversity of society in history and religious education and sustainable issues in geography. They examine other cultures through art and music. The personal, social, health education programme, incorporating development of pupils’ emotional development, covers citizenship issues such as responsibilities, rights and respect, very well. To support pupils who learn French, the school has links with a French school in London and pupils visit the country. Assemblies cover topics such as team work, respect and, occasionally, items in the news. In Year 5, pupils attend a citizenship day at a local secondary school. This focuses on a wide range of topics.
p.2
Leadership and management of citizenship
You and your staff value citizenship as a subject that prepares young people to play an active role in society. You foster understanding and celebration of your pupils’ different ethnic and faith backgrounds. You are aware that further work is needed to make the school council a democratically elected body of pupils from all classes. Your audit of the personal, social, health and emotional education programmes is accurate so you know which citizenship topics are not covered in enough detail and have plans to develop them. You have many strong links with the local community. The co-ordinator who is developing your creative curriculum is alert to how citizenship can be incorporated into this approach. The EMAG co- ordinator ensures that pupils from other countries, and their parents, are welcomed into, and valued as members of the school community. Governors are fully involved in the life of the school, for example
p.2
Leadership and management of citizenship
supporting the school’s ‘Green Day’ and generating the sustainable plan for the school grounds.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
helping pupils to discuss topical events more often and, when relevant, to research such issues using fund-raising for charity as a way to explore the different types of voluntary organisations that exist in the local, UK and world communities strengthening the role of the school council and electing all members.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop citizenship in the school.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your Local Authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next inspection.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion