Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

SCITTELS

Inspected — · published 28 May 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Juliet Ward

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Juliet Ward

  • Postcode verified

    E15 1JY

  • Name on report verified

    SCITTELS

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+76Very positivemore positive than 76% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongeffectivevery wellwell plannedpositiveclearconfidentstrengths
Criticismnot sufficientlydeclinedweakergapslow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings795w+73
  • Leadership1048w+73

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,807
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 43%Leadership 56%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Juliet Ward HMI

reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website ( www.ofsted.gov.uk ).

p.2

Introduction

The School Centred Initial Teacher Training for East London Schools (SCITTELS) works in partnership with 30 schools to provide primary initial teacher training (ITT) courses. It offers a one-year Postgraduate Certificate in Education (PGCE) for the 3 to 7 and the 5 to 11 age ranges. At the time of the inspection there were 36 trainees.

p.3

Context

The inspection was carried out by a team of inspectors in accordance with the Ofsted Handbook for the Inspection of Initial Teacher Training (2005-2011).

p.3

Context

This report draws on evidence from a short inspection of the provision and an inspection of the management and quality assurance arrangements.

p.3

Grades are awarded in accordance with the following scale

Grade 1 Outstanding Grade 2 Good Grade 3 Satisfactory Grade 4 Inadequate

p.3

Management and quality assurance: Grade: 2

The overall quality of training is at least good.

p.3

Management and quality assurance: Grade: 2

The next inspection of this provider will take place in accordance with the Initial Teacher Education Inspection Framework.

p.3

Key strengths

 the strong links that are made in training between theory and practice, particularly with regard to inclusion and the management of behaviour

p.4

Key strengths

 the recruitment and selection of high calibre, confident trainees who are committed to teaching in ethnically diverse areas

p.4

Key strengths

 the effective management of the consortium which leads to good levels of communication and involvement of partners

p.4

Key strengths

 the strong collegiate partnership across the consortium and high level of commitment to the trainees’ progress

p.4

Key strengths

 the well focused and individualised support for the trainees throughout the consortium

p.4

Key strengths

 the good quality of training for school-based and professional tutors which ensures the trainees’ needs are met through well planned individual training programmes.

p.4

Points for consideration

 ensuring the trainees have easy access to up-to-date reading lists and library facilities

p.4

Points for consideration

 developing further the use of benchmarking against other providers and using the data to strengthen improvement planning

p.4

Points for consideration

 making more immediate use of the information gained from the initial auditing of trainees’ subject knowledge to address areas in need of development.

p.4

The quality of training

1. The training has maintained its strengths and continues to improve. The main strengths are the emphasis given to inclusion and to the management of behaviour; the clear focus on the Standards; and the practical nature of the training, enabling very strong links to be made between theory and practice.

p.5

The quality of training

2. At the heart of the course there is a strong commitment to inclusion. Trainees are prepared very well for teaching pupils who speak English as an additional language. They are given a good understanding of special educational needs and come into contact with pupils across a broad spectrum. They have positive attitudes to ethnic diversity and acquire a good understanding of cultural differences. The commitment to inclusion runs through everything that they do, and is particularly effective in preparing them to teach in schools in the area.

p.5

The quality of training

3. Effective training in behaviour management and classroom organisation is given at an early stage in the course. As a result, trainees are already aware of a range of strategies when they first go into schools. They are strongly encouraged to follow the behaviour policies of the schools that they are in, and school-based tutors comment that trainees are generally confident and positive in their approach to promoting good behaviour.

p.5

The quality of training

4. The modular organisation of the course is effective. In the core subject module, English, mathematics and science are all well covered so that trainees acquire a good understanding of the requirements of the National Curriculum and the Curriculum Framework for the Foundation Stage. They respond with interest and enthusiasm to the well-planned sessions that are taught by tutors with considerable expertise and up-to-date experience. The teaching style is interactive, with tutors modelling good primary practice and giving trainees opportunities to develop understanding and confidence through practical activities. The core subjects are largely taught in blocks fairly early in the year, which helps trainees to develop subject specific teaching skills before their first block practice. Trainees are also enthusiastic about the training that they receive in all the foundation subjects, but again the training is blocked, with the result that there is no opportunity to revisit

p.5

The quality of training

5. Information and communication technology (ICT) is well integrated into the training, helping trainees to use it confidently in their teaching and for their own personal research. However, the trainees do not have good enough library facilities and the reading lists that they are given are not sufficiently up-to-date.

p.5

The quality of training

6. The opportunity provided by the introduction of the new Standards has been well used to clarify the way in which the elements of the training relate to the Standards and to ensure that centre-based trainers, professional tutors and school- based tutors have a common understanding of them. Trainees are familiar with them from the outset of the course. They are developing ways of recording evidence against them and identifying gaps and making sure that they are filled. They take responsibility for increasing their subject knowledge and value the support they are given by tutors, particularly in the additional tutorial sessions at the end of the training day. Their skills in English and mathematics are audited at the time that they apply, and they draw up an action plan as a result, although this is not followed up sufficiently rapidly.

p.5

The quality of training

7. There is well focused and individualised support for trainees. Centre-based training takes place in the lead school, where many of the tutors are teachers. Sessions often involve the trainees in working with pupils and therefore enabling them to put theory into practice almost immediately. There are strong links between centre-based and school-based training, and trainees are given tasks and assignments to do in schools that are closely related to the centre-based training. Although some trainees are specialising in Foundation Stage and Key Stage 1 and others in Key Stage 1 and Key Stage 2, they all have some training that goes across the 3 – 11 age range. In particular, they follow an early years module that gives them practical experience in a nursery.

p.6

Management and quality assurance

8. The selection procedures are successful in identifying suitable trainees who perform well in written work and practical teaching and go on to obtain teaching posts, mainly in local schools. Withdrawal rates have declined since the last inspection and are now low. The selection process is well planned and includes a range of tasks on the day of the interview. Partnership schools take turns in hosting the interviews; this is very good practice since it provides opportunities to observe candidates interacting with pupils. All stages of the process are informed by clear criteria which are applied fairly and consistently by school-based and centre-based staff. Appropriate procedures are in place to carry out the necessary checks on candidates.

p.6

Management and quality assurance

9. The website and other sources of information about the course are detailed and promote positive images to encourage applications from under-represented groups. Proportions of male trainees and those from minority ethnic groups are high and this is a strong feature of recruitment. It reflects the partnership’s commitment to recruiting such trainees who will go on to teach in the ethnically diverse local area.

p.6

Management and quality assurance

10. The relatively small size of the partnership helps to foster good partnership arrangements which lead to effective programmes. School-based staff, the local authority advisers and the centre-based staff are highly committed to the partnership and this is a strong feature. Partnership school staff contribute regularly to centre-based training. Schools are well represented on management and executive groups which are involved in making decisions about all aspects of provision. The day-to-day management provided by the curriculum manager is effective and demonstrates awareness of the individual needs of trainees and school-based staff. The partnership agreement is a clear, accessible document and is well understood by partnership school staff and governors. 11. The roles and responsibilities of all staff and trainees are set out in the documentation. School- and centre-based staff are very clear about their roles in the

p.6

Management and quality assurance

training. Communications are very good. Day-to-day information is sent to schools by email and the course calendar sets out clearly what trainees are expected to do each week. School-based staff have a secure understanding of the content of centre-based courses. Tasks and assignments enhance trainees’ ability to consolidate their knowledge of specific subjects and aspects in the school. The personal tutors, based at the centre, are readily accessible to all partnership staff and trainees, who feel very well supported throughout the training.

p.7

Management and quality assurance

12. The arrangements to ensure that trainers have the necessary knowledge and skills are good. Initial training and ongoing briefing of school-based and professional tutors are a strength and highly regarded by all tutors. For example, school-based tutors are briefed thoroughly before each block school experience. The provider also organises additional bespoke training for individual schools and tutors as necessary. Arrangements for the training of centre-based staff are good; new staff are inducted and supported well by the curriculum manager.

p.7

Management and quality assurance

13. The monitoring of equal opportunities and the promotion of good race relations is very thorough and this is one of the reasons that the recruitment of trainees from a wide range of ethnic minority backgrounds is so successful. The monitoring of the quality of training is also rigorous. The curriculum and quality assurance managers monitor directly every aspect of provision. Termly and annual reviews of the course modules are compiled based on a broad range of evidence.

p.7

Management and quality assurance

14. Good procedures are well-embedded to ensure the effective monitoring of the assessment process. Written assignments are marked rigorously according to clear criteria. Some assignments are second marked and the external examiner looks closely at a sample. The written feedback given to trainees is detailed for the weaker assignments. However, the guidance given to those trainees who have submitted a good assignment tends to be brief and does not guide them on how to improve even further. The monitoring of the assessment of practical teaching is very good. A wide range of staff observe trainees teaching. Observations are often undertaken jointly and there is much discussion between staff about individual trainees. The feedback given to them is very thorough. The termly review in which personal tutors discuss with each trainee their progress in subject knowledge, written work and practical teaching is an important element. External examiners’ reports are of good quality

p.7

Management and quality assurance

and the provider responds promptly to all recommendations.

p.7

Management and quality assurance

15. The range of evidence used to evaluate the quality of provision is broad. Trainees evaluate their training regularly and provide detailed comments which identify specific aspects that might be improved. Partnership staff also evaluate provision, for example in the management and executive groups, or at the termly professional tutors’ meetings. Managers make realistic evaluations of provision. The self-evaluation for this inspection was accurate and set out in an informative way. 16. For the course as a whole, action planning is sound. Appropriate and effective action has been taken on the points raised in the last inspection. However, plans tend to focus on generic aspects and subject specific action points are rare. The provider benchmarks itself against other local providers but the information gained is not used well enough to improve the provision further.

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion