Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 6 Aug 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Christine Jones

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Christine Jones

  • Postcode verified

    RH13 5HR

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+20Mostly positivemore positive than 60% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimproving

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings29w0
  • What needs to improve84w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
111
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 5%What needs to improve 15%About the inspection 79%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr L Nettley Headteacher Millais School Depot Road Horsham West Sussex RH13 5HR

p.1

Ofsted subject survey: good practice in science

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 11 July 2008 to look at work in science.

p.1

Ofsted subject survey: good practice in science

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted subject survey: good practice in science

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: discussions with the deputy head, the science management team and Year 10 students, observation of three lessons, scrutiny of documents and scrutiny of pupils’ work.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 Students are making good progress during Key Stage 3 and reach high standards.  In Key Stage 4 students study either double science or all three separate sciences. The number of students gaining five A* - C grades for double science is just above that achieved nationally although within that number over one fifth of students reached the highest grades. Students taking three sciences also make good progress and reach standards that are above average.  Pupils make it clear that they very much appreciate the enthusiasm and hard work of their teachers and several said this was why they like science and intended to continue with it as a career.  The refurbishing of laboratories and the installation of interactive whiteboards have created a very positive environment for learning science.  There is a systematic and detailed approach to assessment that gives pupils detailed feedback on their performance in tests and examinations.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 There is a good emphasis in some lessons on scientific enquiry. This is well liked by students and promotes their engagement and interest.  Some teachers are making good use of strategies to involve students in understanding their own learning styles and how they can use this to improve the progress they make.  Information and communication technology is being used more than previously, and this is helping pupils to develop as independent learners.  The curriculum provides good opportunities for students to develop their interests in science. The option to study three sciences at GCSE is open to all, not just to the more able.  The good leadership of the department had created a strong team that works well together and provides students with good quality science education.  Very good self evaluation strategies give a clear picture of the work of the department. All members of the team participate in this process and

p.2

Features of good practice observed

students’ opinions also make an important contribution. Outcomes of the evaluation process are used very effectively to plan future developments.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, included:

 developing strategies for marking students work that give more feedback on what they need to do to improve  extending the science curriculum beyond the classroom by improving science related extra-curricular activities.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop science in the school.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, included:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion