Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 31 Jul 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Susan Bowles

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Susan Bowles

  • Postcode verified

    M32 0XA

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+20Mostly positivemore positive than 35% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimproving

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings13w0
  • What needs to improve61w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
73
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 2%What needs to improve 11%About the inspection 87%

Full report text

Mr D Davies Headteacher Stretford High School Great Stone Road Manchester M32 0XA

p.1

Ofsted subject survey: good practice in English

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 11 June to look at work in English.

p.1

Ofsted subject survey: good practice in English

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted subject survey: good practice in English

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: discussions with staff and students; scrutiny of documentation and students’ work; and observation of three lessons.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 Achievement in English is excellent. Many students enter the school with low levels of literacy or at an early stage of learning English. By the time they leave the school, students achieve examination results broadly in line with the national average. The department has a good track record of ensuring all groups of students make very good progress, especially in Key Stage 4. The department has identified pockets of lower attainment, for example, in reading in Key Stage 3.  Your students are extremely positive about English. They form very good relationships with their teachers. One boy’s view that “We know we are all special to them” summed up the very good climate of the classroom discussions seen and the sensitive yet specific guidance given to students about how to improve their work.  Students greatly appreciate the wide range of visitors, outings, events and out of school support which the department provides. They are also

p.1

Features of good practice observed

positive about the way the curriculum is tailored to their needs. For example, Year 8 and 9 students taught in groups based on stage of Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk learning, rather than age, are motivated by the challenge and appreciate how it is helping them make rapid progress.  English lessons are stimulating, varied and active. Topics and resources are carefully chosen to reflect students’ interests, broaden their experiences and challenge their understanding. Expectations are high and there is a growing emphasis on learning independently. Students often ask their own questions and express individual views, and the teachers skilfully build on what they offer. Students learn to manage group work and to treat different viewpoints with the respect modelled by the teachers.  The subject leader’s passionate enthusiasm for the subject is shared by

p.1

Features of good practice observed

the cohesive and energetic team. The team, including the teaching assistant who leads literacy interventions, works with a high degree of consistency.  There is a common determination to raise standards. Monitoring is rigorous and the subject leader has a thorough understanding of strengths and areas for development. Good practice is shared effectively. This has had a positive effect on students’ understanding of their next steps in English. The department is innovative and evaluative, well supported by yourself and the senior team. Teachers enjoy working together on developing schemes of work and review their work in the light of evidence.

p.2

Areas for development

 improving students’ progress in reading in Key Stage 3

p.2

Areas for development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop English in the school.

p.2

Areas for development

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion