Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 31 Jul 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Michael Maddison

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Michael Maddison

  • Postcode verified

    HG3 1BA

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+51Positivemore positive than 80% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingstrongenjoymake good progresswell plannedconfidentlyeagerskilfully
Criticismnot alwayslimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings488w+63
  • Leadership257w−5
  • What needs to improve88w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
814
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 49%Leadership 26%What needs to improve 9%About the inspection 16%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs J Turner Headteacher Spofforth CE Controlled Primary School School Lane Spofforth Harrogate North Yorkshire HG3 1BA

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – history

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 19 June to look at work in history.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – history

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on information and communication technology (ICT) in history and on provision for gifted and talented history pupils.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – history

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – history

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with staff and pupils, a scrutiny of relevant documentation, an analysis of pupils’ work and the observation of two lessons.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – history

The overall effectiveness of history was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Achievement is good and standards are above average.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Pupils of all ages make good progress and some make outstanding progress in developing their historical knowledge and understanding.  Pupils write and talk confidently about their work and can use historical terms accurately. Their knowledge is good; for example, those in Years 1 and 2 could talk at length about the Great Fire of London and the importance of Samuel Pepys, while those in Years 3 and 4 had a good appreciation of the impact of rationing on people in Britain in the Second World War.  Pupils can seek out relevant evidence, ask perceptive questions and use the information they have discovered to produce well articulated explanations. However, pupils’ specific historical skills, such as understanding chronology and evaluating sources, are not so well developed.  Pupils’ personal development is outstanding. They are eager to learn and thoroughly enjoy their lessons. They are keen to be involved in

p.1

Achievement and standards

discussions. They take a pride in their work and their behaviour is first rate.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

The quality of teaching and learning is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

 Lessons are well planned and teachers skilfully engage pupils in their work. Good questioning by teachers, and particularly the use of supplementary questions, reinforces the learning and helps the pupils to develop their knowledge and understanding.  Teachers are enthusiastic towards the subject and this is reflected in the pupils’ interest in their work. Relationships between pupils and teachers are strong and pupils work well together. Different tasks are set to meet the needs of the pupils but expectations and aspirations for the most able are not always explicit enough.  Pupils’ work is regularly marked. Teachers give much praise and helpful guidance is provided. However, written comments do not always indicate how pupils could improve their work in history.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

 The curriculum is broad and balanced and meets requirements. The school follows a rolling two-year programme. It recognises that it would be appropriate to review the history units covered to ensure that the most suitable topics are taught within each year group and that each topic is taught for an adequate amount of time.  Cross-curricular links are strong and do much to strengthen pupils’ learning. Literacy is particularly well developed and opportunities to improve speaking and listening skills are regularly taken in history lessons. There are close links with other subjects, including geography, art, and design and technology.  Pupils enjoy visits and learning outside the classroom makes a considerable contribution to pupils’ learning in history. Trips to Temple Newsam House and Eden Camp, for example, are interlinked with work in the classroom and the pupils can explain in depth how these visits

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

help their learning when they are back in school.

p.2

Leadership and management

The leadership and management of history are good.

p.3

Leadership and management

 The subject coordinator is conscientious and dedicated and she is determined to see provision for history developed throughout the school. She is well supported in this by yourself and by the teaching staff.  The subject is well organised, planning is thorough and the limited resources are used wisely. The coordinator has an accurate view of the strengths of the subject and of the areas for development.  The work of the coordinator in monitoring planning is well established. However, the school acknowledges that the role of the coordinator is underdeveloped in relation to the checking of pupils’ work and teachers’ assessments, and in the monitoring of teaching and learning. As a result, the sharing of good practice, for example, is ‘ad hoc’ and not all teachers benefit systematically from the good practice which exists within the school.

p.3

Subject issue: ICT

 Facilities are limited but teachers take the opportunity not only to use ICT in their teaching whenever it is appropriate but also to plan tasks which allow pupils to use ICT in their work. Undertaking research on the internet strengthens pupils’ enquiry skills, and the creation of PowerPoint presentations and the word processing of assignments help them develop valuable skills.

p.3

Subject issue: provision for gifted and talented history students

The provision for gifted history students is satisfactory.

p.3

Subject issue: provision for gifted and talented history students

 Teachers plan for different ability groups but the needs of the most able pupils are not being fully met in history because expectations and aspirations for these individuals are not always made explicit by teachers in the tasks they set.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 developing pupils’ historical skills  developing written feedback to ensure that pupils are given precise advice on how they can improve their work in history  improving provision for gifted history pupils.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop history in the school. As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion