Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 31 Jul 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Judith Straw

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Judith Straw

  • Postcode verified

    M32 9DP

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+72Very positivemore positive than 92% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingstrongconfidentkeeneffectiveproudenjoysensitive
Criticismseriously

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings518w+67
  • Leadership169w+57

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
657
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
1
typical 2
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Leadership 21%About the inspection 15%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr M Mountcastle Headteacher St Hugh of Lincoln RC Primary School Glastonbury Road Stretford Manchester M32 9DP

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 subject survey inspection programme: citizenship

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 9 June 2008 to look at work in citizenship.

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 subject survey inspection programme: citizenship

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 subject survey inspection programme: citizenship

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with staff and learners, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of six lessons and assembly.

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 subject survey inspection programme: citizenship

The overall effectiveness of citizenship was judged to be good with outstanding features.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Pupils are articulate and confident and express their views well.  The contribution of citizenship to pupils’ personal development is outstanding.  The pupils are interested in their local and wider communities and keen to make a contribution to their area. The Lowry style mural, ‘Going to Church’ which decorates one wall of the school hall is a fitting celebration of the strong sense of community in school.  Pupils engage in a wide range of fund-raising activities and understand the importance of the work of different charities. For example, every year the school supports the ‘Send a Cow to Africa’ initiative.  Pupils have a good understanding of important issues such as democracy, the need to conserve the environment and the sensible use of resources.  The school encourages discussion and debate and the pupils are good at expressing their views and listening to the views of others.  Pupils use information technology well to research ideas and present

p.1

Achievement and standards

their findings.  Pupils have a reasonable understanding of the different faiths practised in Britain today and the many diverse cultural backgrounds of British citizens.  The democratically elected School Council is effective in voicing the views of pupils and is rightly proud of its achievements.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

The quality of teaching and learning is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

 Teachers plan lessons which encourage pupils to participate and discuss topical matters.  Teachers demonstrate good subject knowledge and use a range of interesting and stimulating resources including a wide range of information communication technology (ICT) resources.  Teachers deal well with sensitive and controversial issues. They make sure that all discussions are well balanced and that pupils understand that there can be two sides to an argument.  Good relationships across the school ensure that pupils learn in a friendly, safe and stimulating environment which they clearly enjoy.  Assessment is good. As well as teacher assessments, pupils assess their own and each others’ work.  Good support is offered to pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities. Just occasionally the pace slows if pupils are not given sufficient challenge.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

 Citizenship aims and objectives underpin all lesson planning and the school takes very seriously its responsibility to prepare pupils to play their part as active citizens.  The school is developing a cross-curricular approach through themed work to allow teachers and pupils to investigate topics in greater breadth and depth. Sometimes, however, pupils are not made aware of the citizenship dimension and they cannot say how well they are doing in citizenship-related work.  The curriculum uses many local issues as topics for discussion so that pupils feel that they are fully involved in the development of their area and that their voice is heard.  The curriculum provides an outstanding range of opportunities for pupils to participate in active citizenship within school and beyond it.  The school is actively promoting links with France, Italy, Japan and Eritrea.

p.2

Leadership and management

The leadership and management of citizenship are good.

p.3

Leadership and management

 The school ethos puts Christian values of fairness and justice at the heart of its vision.  All leaders ensure that the school fulfils the ideals of the Every Child Matters agenda and develop in pupils and staff a keen sense of responsibility.  You manage this curriculum area well, working with other senior managers to monitor teaching, learning and outcomes in citizenship and constantly seeking to improve it.  Self-evaluation is strong and there is good capacity for further improvement.

p.3

Leadership and management

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

p.3

Leadership and management

 to ensure that pupils are aware of how well they are doing in specific citizenship topics.

p.3

Leadership and management

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop citizenship in the school.

p.3

Leadership and management

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion