Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 31 Jul 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Paul Armitage

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Paul Armitage

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+54Positivemore positive than 82% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisevery wellclearpositivemake good progresseffectivelypreciselykeen
Criticismweaknesslimitednot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings532w+33
  • Leadership249w+73
  • What needs to improve83w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
841
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 48
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 52%Leadership 24%What needs to improve 8%About the inspection 15%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs V Shaw Headteacher Scantabout Primary School Ionic Close Chandler’s Ford Hampshire S053 2NR

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – history

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 04 July 2008 to look at work in history.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – history

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on the use of information and communication technology (ICT) in history and the provision for gifted history pupils.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – history

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – history

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with staff and students, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of students’ work and observation of one lesson.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – history

The overall effectiveness of history was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Standards in history are above average and pupils make good progress.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Pupils interviewed speak fluently about the topics they have studied and pupils’ exercise books are lively and colourful indicating their ability to use a good range of skills. Particularly good is the way they are asked to think about evidence and reach their own conclusions.  Links with other subjects are clear and developing. The standards achieved in Year 2’s art work on the Great Fire of London are impressive.  Despite this positive picture, one weakness noted in the sample of exercise books inspected was the limited presence of extended writing.  Pupils’ personal development in history is very good. Those interviewed expressed the view that the history they are studying is helping them to understand people as well as why and how things happen. Year 6 were seen doing this effectively by trying to sort out human dilemmas; in this case, the positive and negative effects of evacuation in the Second World War.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning

The quality of teaching and learning is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

 Teachers’ knowledge and understanding of the topics studied is good, as is their understanding of how best to teach them.  They make lessons and other activities interesting and fun and give pupils plenty of opportunity to take an active part and find things out for themselves. However, the school is right to explore ways of giving pupils more responsibility for their own learning.  It is clear from both the lesson seen and other examples of pupils’ work that behind the teaching and learning is good planning. There are clear objectives, well-conceived lesson plans and imaginative resources.  All groups of pupils learn well including those with learning difficulties and/or disabilities.  There is a very thorough assessment system which informs teachers and helps them adjust their teaching to meet pupils’ needs more precisely. However, it is not yet used to provide an overall judgement on pupils’ progress in history in the same way that this is done for

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

English and mathematics. Nor is it used to provide pupils with a clear enough view on their current standard in history and targets for improvement.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

 It follows faithfully the requirements of the National Curriculum.  There are very good links between history and other subjects. Besides art, there is good use of ICT and drama.  The topics taught are richly supported not only by good use of resources in school but also by a good number of visits to historical venues, as well as visitors who organise a range of activities. These have a significant impact on pupils’ understanding; for example, the opportunity to take part in a re-enactment of Egyptian burial practices or the visit to Beaulieu to explore Victorian stately homes.  Building on its success in developing links between subjects, the school has appropriate plans (and some provision already in place) to develop the history curriculum further to improve pupils’ chronological understanding and to help their understanding of the modern world.

p.2

Leadership and management

The leadership and management of history are good.

p.3

Leadership and management

 The subject leader has a good understanding of the quality of the subject in school, although she is hampered by not having enough time to see colleagues teach.  The planning undertaken by the leader sets clear parameters and thus is very helpful to all teachers.  She supports teachers well and promotes good discussion and development of the subject.  She is very well supported by the headteacher who is keen to maintain pupils’ and teachers’ interest and momentum in the subject.

p.3

Subject issue: The use of ICT in history

 ICT is very well used in history. There is frequent use in history by pupils of word processing, PowerPoint for the presentation of pupils’ historical findings, research on the internet; and the use of video cameras for recording evidence. Specific examples illustrating the relationship between history and ICT are Year 5’s use of a Victorian database on famous people; spreadsheets in Year 6 linked to the study of Greek gods; and a multimedia history quiz in Year 6 using specialist word processing software and hyperlinks.

p.3

Subject issue: Provision for gifted history pupils

 There is currently no pupil identified as being gifted in history. There is a register of gifted and talented pupils but this is populated by pupils from English, mathematics, ICT, physical education, art and music.  Teaching and learning in history classes takes account of the different needs and abilities of pupils but this alone would not add up to a formal programme for gifted historians if any are identified.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 increase the opportunities for pupils to take more responsibility for their own learning  improve the use of assessment data  improve the coherence of the curriculum.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop history in the school. As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion