Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 31 Jul 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Christine Jones

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Christine Jones

  • Postcode verified

    PO18 8DR

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+40Positivemore positive than 72% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisewell plannedenjoyenthusiasticpositivestrengthssafeclear
Criticismnot alwaysmissednot clearlynot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings460w+29
  • Leadership78w+43
  • What needs to improve54w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
570
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 62%Leadership 10%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 21%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs J Arrowsmith Headteacher Funtington Primary School Heather Close West Ashling Chichester West Sussex PO18 8DR

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 9 June to look at work in science.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science

As I outlined, as well as looking at key areas of science, the visit had a particular focus on transition within and between phases; the range of learning experiences; the status and use of SC1.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with you, the science subject leader, other teachers, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of parts of two lessons.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science

The overall effectiveness of science was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Standards in science are in line with the national average. Achievement is good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 The overall attainment of pupils entering the school is just above the national average.  By the end of Year 6, pupils who have been in the school from Foundation stage show good attainment with almost all reaching at nationally expected levels or higher.  In recent years several pupils have left and others come into the school. This movement has impacted on the standards pupils reach.  Overall progress made by pupils in science is good.  The scrutiny of pupils’ work shows that by Year 6 their work is completed, well presented and gives evidence of a good range of activity in science.  Science makes an important contribution to developing pupils’ knowledge and understanding of how to keep safe and live a healthy lifestyle.  Pupils enjoy science. Their behaviour in lessons is good and they demonstrate good attitudes to learning.  The work in science which is well contextualised is contributing satisfactorily to pupils’ future economic well-being.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning of science

The quality of teaching and learning are good.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of science

 Teachers have good subject knowledge and are enthusiastic about science.  There are good, positive relationships between teachers and pupils in lessons.  Lessons are well planned and provide a suitable range of learning opportunities and there is a good emphasis on teaching through practical activities although the learning intentions that underpin practical work are not always clearly linked to the associated investigative skills.  Opportunities are sometimes missed for turning ordinary practical activities into real investigations that could excite and engage the pupils.  Pupils’ work is thoroughly marked although techniques for formative assessment to help learning in science are underdeveloped. There were good examples of teachers’ interventions helping pupils to understand.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

The quality of the curriculum in science is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

 The science curriculum is organised using QCA schemes of work adapted to the needs of the school. Planning is thorough and covers all aspects of the content of the National Curriculum.  Planning for scientific enquiry is not as detailed and there is no clear overview of progression in development of scientific skills.  The school’s environmental area provides a wealth of opportunities for scientific activities, particularly those associated with life and living processes.  In the Foundation Stage pupils are given many good opportunities for developing knowledge and understanding through exploration and play.  The school organises two science days each year. These provide very good opportunities for extending different aspects of science and including outside visits, visitors and activities.

p.2

Leadership and management of science

Leadership and management of science are good.

p.3

Leadership and management of science

 The science coordinator has a clear view of the subject-specific strengths and areas for development, thus maintaining an overview of the curriculum across the school.  Individual teachers track pupils’ progress in science through the use of teacher assessments and tests. However, central collection of pupils’ assessment data and passing them from one year to the next as they move through the school is at an early stage of development.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 linking all practical activities to attainment targets for scientific enquiry so that progress in this areas can be easily tracked  developing investigative science so that pupils are given more opportunities develop the full range of investigative skills.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop science in the school.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion