Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 31 Jul 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

David Anstead

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    David Anstead

  • Postcode verified

    B77 2HH

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+19Mostly positivemore positive than 59% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisegood progressimprovedimprovingconfidentrichstrengthsclearconsistent
Criticismdeficienciesweaknessesinsufficientlyinsufficientfalling behindlimitedbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings472w+18
  • Leadership421w−2
  • What needs to improve114w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
986
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 48
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 41%Leadership 37%What needs to improve 10%About the inspection 13%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs B Dandy Headteacher Oakhill Primary School Hawksworth Glascote Heath Tamworth B77 2HH

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – ICT

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 03 July to look at work in information communication and technology (ICT).

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – ICT

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on the quality of assessment.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – ICT

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – ICT

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with staff and children, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of children’s work and observation of lessons.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – ICT

The overall effectiveness of ICT was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement and standards in ICT

 The Early Years staff visits all families at home before they start in the Nursery. This enables the school to survey the range of technology children have access to at home and what they are and are not able to use. This initial assessment shows that attainment on entry in ICT is well below average.  Children make very good progress from the Nursery to the end of Key Stage 1 because teaching is good and teachers and teaching assistants have good subject knowledge. At this point children are confident in accessing their files on the network, editing text and in using digital cameras and floor robots.  Children’s progress levels off’ during Key Stage 2 due to past limitations in staff subject knowledge. Nevertheless, because children made such good progress at Key Stage 1 and considering their starting points, achievement overall from when children join the school to when they leave is good. Standards are broadly average.

p.1

Achievement and standards in ICT

 The majority of children spoken to are aware of the need not to reveal personal information about themselves when on online.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of ICT

 Teachers plan thematic units of work bringing together skills from several different subjects including ICT. The school has deliberately ensured that not all ICT resources are located in the computer suites so that there are several computers and laptops available in every classroom. This accessibility of ICT means it is used frequently and widely, by children, to improve their learning when working in a range of subjects.  A recent focus on staff training has improved teachers’ subject knowledge and expertise. This is too recent to have impacted on children’s standards at Key Stage 2.  Children with learning difficulties and/or disabilities make the same good progress as other children because of the good extra support they receive from a teaching assistant.  Sometimes higher attaining children are insufficiently challenged because the tasks they are given result in them rehearsing skills they have already

p.2

Quality of the curriculum for ICT

 The statutory National Curriculum for ICT is provided although some aspects are better covered than others particularly at Key Stage 2.  The Nursery, Reception and Key Stage 1 curriculum is good. Children have a rich variety of technological experiences and teacher subject knowledge and expertise at this level is good.  At Key Stage 2 there is good provision for children to develop their skills in using ICT for communicating and presenting their work. However, provision for controlling events and modelling is only satisfactory. This is partly because the school has had insufficient resources to teach these aspects of ICT well and partly because teachers lacked the knowledge required. These deficiencies are now being addressed.

p.2

Leadership and management of ICT

Leadership and management are good.  You have made the development of ICT provision a high priority for the school. Use of a national ICT self-evaluation tool has given you a good grasp of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. An ICT action plan, which is linked to the school development plan, sets out the priorities for improvement. The plan is sensible about what can be realistically achieved in the timescales and is carefully costed. You have sought and obtained additional funding to be able to implement some of the school’s more costly aspirations. Developing children’s ICT capability is given the same high importance as developing their literacy and numeracy skills.  Children now have access to more ICT resources in their classrooms which they are increasingly using to improve their learning in other subjects. An audit of staff expertise has enabled targeted training to be provided and some teachers’ subject knowledge and confidence in using some aspects

p.2

Leadership and management of ICT

of ICT has improved. Consequently the quality of teaching and learning is improving and teachers feel able to offer a more challenging ICT curriculum which is under preparation for delivery from September 2008.  You regularly monitor and evaluate the quality of provision. Teachers’ planning is checked and the quality of children’s ICT work is evaluated to ensure provision is improving.

p.3

Use of Assessment

 Each unit of work has specific learning objectives for ICT which are shared with children when it is introduced. Children are clear about what they are expected to be able to do by the end of the unit. There are well established systems for children to evaluate their own progress and to show their teachers evidence of what they claim they can do.  In Year 6 children are given time limited tasks to complete which are rigorously assessed against National Curriculum levels.  Teachers record the range of ICT experiences children have accessed along with an evaluation of the skills they have acquired and those they have still to achieve. These assessments are monitored through the school’s tracking system so that information about which children are meeting their targets and which are falling behind is readily available. Children are given further opportunities and extra support where they are identified as not meeting the learning objectives.

p.3

Use of Assessment

 Assessment of children’s work is moderated and standardised at regular meetings within the school and at meetings with neighbouring primary schools. This ensures assessment information is consistent and reliable within the cluster of primary schools whose children go on to join the same secondary school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 maintaining the very good progress made by children in ICT at Key Stage 1 through into Key Stage 2  improving the provision for children to learn about controlling events, modelling and handling data at Key Stage 2  taking into account the skills children have acquired from outside school when planning challenging work for the higher attainers.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.4

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop ICT in the school.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion