Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 31 Jul 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Michael Smith

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Michael Smith

  • Postcode verified

    SY6 6EX

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 20% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings29w0
  • What needs to improve82w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
109
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
5
typical 2
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 6%What needs to improve 18%About the inspection 76%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr J Allin Headteacher Church Stretton School Shrewsbury Road Church Stretton Shropshire SY6 6EX

p.1

Ofsted subject survey: good practice in mathematics

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 5 and 6 June 2008 to look at work in mathematics. The visit focused on the quality of teaching, how well the school ensures students understand and enjoy mathematics and how the school has improved the quality of mathematics teaching.

p.1

Ofsted subject survey: good practice in mathematics

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted subject survey: good practice in mathematics

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and students, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of students’ work and observation of seven lessons.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 Excellent relationships between staff and students ensure students enjoy mathematics and make very good progress.  Staff readily give of themselves and share their enthusiasm of mathematics with students at all levels of ability.  Lessons are very well planned and engaging; they are not over-reliant upon textbooks and provide abundant opportunities for students to work in groups and independently.  Teachers provided a good variety of activities. Across the department, staff are very good at sharing materials and teaching approaches.  Teachers make good use of information communication technology (ICT) within lessons to enhance learning.  Very good use of targets ensures students are challenged by their work and have high expectations of themselves. In 2007 almost a quarter of students gained an A* or A grade in the GCSE examinations and students at all levels made considerably better progress than similar students in

p.1

Features of good practice observed

other schools.  Good intervention by teachers enables students to keep up with their peers during lessons. Support is for students of all levels and not just targeted at those likely to miss a grade C at GCSE or a Level 5 in Key Stage 3 tests.  Very strong leadership supports staff well by making sure they have access to a rich variety of interesting resources.  Staff use their good subject knowledge well to ensure teaching methods and activities enhance students’ understanding.

p.2

Areas for development

 When re-writing of schemes of work make sure students’ earlier learning is taken fully into account.  Increase opportunities for students to use ICT in lessons to enhance their learning.

p.2

Areas for development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop mathematics in the school.

p.2

Areas for development

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion