Other · Ofsted letter
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Michael Smith
- Postcode verified
SY6 6EX
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- When re-writing of schemes of work make sure students’ earlier learning is taken fully into account. p.2
- Increase opportunities for students to use ICT in lessons to enhance their learning. p.2
- I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop mathematics in the school. p.2
- As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. p.2
- It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection. p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 109
- shorter than usual (typical 963)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Mr J Allin Headteacher Church Stretton School Shrewsbury Road Church Stretton Shropshire SY6 6EX
p.1
Ofsted subject survey: good practice in mathematics
Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 5 and 6 June 2008 to look at work in mathematics. The visit focused on the quality of teaching, how well the school ensures students understand and enjoy mathematics and how the school has improved the quality of mathematics teaching.
p.1
Ofsted subject survey: good practice in mathematics
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.
p.1
Ofsted subject survey: good practice in mathematics
The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and students, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of students’ work and observation of seven lessons.
p.1
Features of good practice observed
Excellent relationships between staff and students ensure students enjoy mathematics and make very good progress. Staff readily give of themselves and share their enthusiasm of mathematics with students at all levels of ability. Lessons are very well planned and engaging; they are not over-reliant upon textbooks and provide abundant opportunities for students to work in groups and independently. Teachers provided a good variety of activities. Across the department, staff are very good at sharing materials and teaching approaches. Teachers make good use of information communication technology (ICT) within lessons to enhance learning. Very good use of targets ensures students are challenged by their work and have high expectations of themselves. In 2007 almost a quarter of students gained an A* or A grade in the GCSE examinations and students at all levels made considerably better progress than similar students in
p.1
Features of good practice observed
other schools. Good intervention by teachers enables students to keep up with their peers during lessons. Support is for students of all levels and not just targeted at those likely to miss a grade C at GCSE or a Level 5 in Key Stage 3 tests. Very strong leadership supports staff well by making sure they have access to a rich variety of interesting resources. Staff use their good subject knowledge well to ensure teaching methods and activities enhance students’ understanding.
p.2
Areas for development
When re-writing of schemes of work make sure students’ earlier learning is taken fully into account. Increase opportunities for students to use ICT in lessons to enhance their learning.
p.2
Areas for development
I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop mathematics in the school.
p.2
Areas for development
As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion