Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 31 Jul 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Peter Limm

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Peter Limm

  • Postcode verified

    WR14 4HF

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+88Very positivemore positive than 97% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentvery wellexcellent relationshipsextremelyeffectiveeffectivelyconsistentlysuccessfully
Criticismyet to

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings361w+91
  • Leadership179w+64
  • What needs to improve68w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
590
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 48
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 48%Leadership 24%What needs to improve 9%About the inspection 20%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr K Wright Headteacher Malvern Wells CE Primary School 263 Wells Road Malvern Worcestershire WR14 4HF

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – history

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on Monday 02 June 2008 to look at work in history.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – history

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on provision for gifted and talented pupils.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – history

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – history

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with yourself, the coordinator for history and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of two lessons.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – history

The overall effectiveness of history was judged to be outstanding.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Achievement and standards are excellent.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Attainment on entry is above average and pupils of all abilities make excellent progress in developing their historical understanding and skills, such as analysing photographs of the local area in their local history work.  Pupils’ personal development is excellent in history. Pupils say they think history is ‘fun’ and that they like learning about changes in the past because this ‘helps them to understand the present’. They behave very well in lessons and help each other out when necessary.  Pupils talk knowledgeably about the past and use examples from a wide period of time to support their general thinking about the importance of history as a subject.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning

The quality of teaching and learning is excellent.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

 Teachers develop excellent relationships with pupils. Lessons are planned with great care to ensure that the needs of individual pupils are taken into account and that all pupils can engage in stimulating activities. Class group work is lively and productive and pupils’ feedback to the whole class is communicated succinctly and cogently.  Learning objectives and expectations are shared with classes so that no one gets left behind in lessons.  Assessment procedures are effective and enable teachers to support and guide pupils well. Teachers constantly communicate to pupils what they expect from different groups and praise those who meet their objectives well.  Teaching assistants are used extremely well to support pupils with learning difficulties.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

 The curriculum is broad and balanced and has recently been changed to enable the topics to suit better the needs of the Foundation Stage in the school.  There is a good emphasis on the key elements of history and pupils are introduced effectively to key historical concepts, such as change over time.  There is good enrichment in the form of numerous visits to places of historical interest. The history of the local Malvern Wells community is also an important, and valued, part of the history curriculum.

p.2

Leadership and management

The leadership and management of history are excellent.

p.2

Leadership and management

 The subject coordinator has, in a short period of time, worked hard to ensure that planning and lesson activities are consistently of a high standard across the school. This is especially so given the other important responsibilities she has within the school.  History is reviewed thoroughly and rigorously every three years, but even in intervening years the coordinator makes sure that necessary changes are made, implemented and evaluated adequately. The subject has made excellent progress since history was last inspected.

p.2

Subject issue: provision for gifted and talented pupils

 Provision is good. However, the coordinator is aware that further work has to be undertaken to ensure that able history pupils are supported better through sharing best practice with other schools that have developed this aspect of their work more successfully and over a longer period of time.  Lessons are planned with the needs of gifted historians in mind but the school has yet to explore how best to use national initiatives in relation to gifted and talented provision to enhance the needs of these individuals further.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 improving further the provision and support for gifted and talented history pupils.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop history in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion