Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 31 Jul 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Russell Jordan

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Russell Jordan

  • Postcode verified

    GL3 1AX

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+72Very positivemore positive than 71% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisesuccessfullywell plannedengaging

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings272w+72
  • What needs to improve67w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
328
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 26, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 80%What needs to improve 20%

Full report text

Mrs L Jenkins Headteacher Innsworth Junior School Rookery Road Innsworth Gloucester Gloucestershire GL3 1AX

p.1

pupils’ future economic well-being in primary schools

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff and students, during my visit on 03 June 2008 to look at work in developing pupils’ future economic well-being. The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

pupils’ future economic well-being in primary schools

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: visits to lessons, discussions with students and staff, review of documentation and students’ work.

p.1

Features of good practice observed include:

 the development of students’ knowledge and understanding of economic and financial concepts using topical, real-life examples; such as the relationship between supply and demand, price and quality, and the prioritisation of spending  the development of students’ use of appropriate technical vocabulary  well planned and engaging lesson activities that successfully linked economic well-being with environmental and global issues  a well organised curriculum, reflecting a whole-child approach; economic well-being and the school’s work in gaining the healthy eating award are successfully integrated with personal, social, health and citizenship education (PSHCE)  well managed opportunities for students to use their own initiative and develop organisational skills in both mini-enterprise activities and charity work  good use of links with other organisations to develop learning Alexandra House 33 Kingsway

p.1

Features of good practice observed include:

London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Features of good practice observed include:

05 June 2008  thorough monitoring and evaluation of the development of economic well-being within both the PSHCE and the overall school curriculum.

p.1

Area for development that we discussed:

 extend the range of organisational links to add further breadth and depth to the curriculum.

p.2

Area for development that we discussed:

I hope these observations are useful for the future development of work in this area.

p.2

Area for development that we discussed:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion