Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 30 May 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jan Bennett

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jan Bennett

  • Postcode verified

    NG20 9PA

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+77Very positivemore positive than 93% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyexcellenteffectivevery wellimprovingstrongimprovedsuccessful
Criticismconcernlower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings584w+83
  • Leadership144w+46
  • What needs to improve85w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
796
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 60%Leadership 15%What needs to improve 9%About the inspection 17%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr J Smith Headteacher Eastlands Junior School Netherfield Lane Meden Vale Mansfield Nottinghamshire NG20 9PA

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visit on 08 April 2008 to look at work in mathematics.

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

As outlined in our initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on the effectiveness of the school’s approaches to improving the quality of teaching and learning in mathematics.

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work, observation of two lessons and visits to three other lessons.

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The overall effectiveness of the subject, mathematics, was judged to be satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Achievement in mathematics is satisfactory and standards are average.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Achievement improved and standards have risen over the last three years.  The progress made in most lessons is at least satisfactory and sometimes good. Pupils have productive discussions about their ideas and methods that improve understanding.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning of mathematics

The quality of teaching and learning of mathematics is satisfactory.  Teachers structure lessons well and include a good variety of interesting activities. Effective use of information and communications technology (ICT) enhances learning and practical tasks are utilised well to augment understanding.  Behaviour is good, allowing pupils to focus on their work. Teachers have good organisation and management skills enabling pupils to move smoothly from one activity to the next without wasting any time.  In the most successful lessons, teachers take care to check the understanding of every individual. In other lessons, however, pupils escape their teachers’ attention by sitting quietly and not participating fully.  The excellent range of carefully tailored tasks is a strong feature of almost every lesson. The tasks are matched well to pupils’ differing levels of understanding and help children of all abilities to make progress.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning of mathematics

 Marking is thorough and linked to pupils’ targets. Written feedback is detailed and helpful and praise and encouragement are given.

p.2

Quality of the mathematics curriculum

The quality of the mathematics curriculum is good.

p.2

Quality of the mathematics curriculum

 There is good provision for the most able pupils. They are set challenging tasks in lessons and there are opportunities to work with gifted and talented pupils from other local schools. There is a weekly club for the most able pupils in Year 6 that develops their thinking and problem-solving skills.  Pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities are well catered for with a good range of intervention strategies and effective support in lessons.  ICT is used well to enhance the curriculum.  Pupils say that teachers are available outside lesson time to give extra help if necessary. There is good support for Year 6 pupils as they prepare for their national tests.  Plans to integrate numeracy across the curriculum are progressing well and further developments are scheduled. Pupils are encouraged to apply their mathematics in different situations and they enjoy working on practical tasks.

p.2

Leadership and management of mathematics

The leadership and management of mathematics are good.

p.2

Leadership and management of mathematics

 Systems for tracking and monitoring pupils’ progress are robust and the analysis is used well.  Performance management is good and managers know the area very well. There are frequent lesson observations by senior managers and the subject leader also observes lessons. Pupils’ work and lesson plans are scrutinised on a regular basis by the subject leader and records show improvements have been made as a result. Test results are carefully analysed and action is taken when any areas concern are identified.  The subject leader has drive and enthusiasm and is constantly looking for ways to improve the provision. Since her appointment and the school’s involvement in the local authority’s Improving Schools Initiative (ISI), leading to Intensifying Support Programme (ISP), teachers work together much more effectively as a team by sharing ideas and resources.

p.2

the quality of teaching and learning in mathematics

The school is effectively improving the quality of teaching and learning. As a lead teacher with the local authority, the subject leader is kept abreast of new developments and is able to bring back good practice from other schools. The ISP consultants’ work alongside staff has made a key contribution to improving the quality of teaching. In addition, information gathered during lesson observations and the more thorough analysis of data enables managers to target training effectively.

p.3

Inclusion

Inclusion in mathematics is good. In the vast majority of lessons, work is set at different levels to ensure that the needs of all pupils are met. Teaching assistants work very closely with teachers and provide good support enabling pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities to work effectively. The progress of the most able pupils is tracked carefully and any under-achievement is addressed. Data are analysed thoroughly and the progress of vulnerable groups is monitored well. Results of national tests in 2007 show no difference between the standards attained by boys and girls. Nevertheless, the school continues to monitor any differences lower down the school and takes action where necessary.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 checking the understanding of every individual pupil in lessons in order to improve achievement further  improving the quality of all teaching and learning to match that of the best.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop mathematics in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As explained in our previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion