Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
The Rose School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
3 Feb 2009
- Inspectorssingle source
Eric Craven
- Achievement verified
Satisfactory
- Care guidance support verified
Good
- Curriculum verified
Satisfactory
- Leadership and management verified
Satisfactory
- Overall effectiveness verified
Satisfactory
- Personal development verified
Good
- Teaching and learning verified
Good
- Postcode verified
BB11 4PF
- Name on report verified
The Rose School
- URN verified
134625
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2006.
- OverallSatisfactory
- AchievementSatisfactory
- Care guidance supportGood
- CurriculumSatisfactory
- Leadership and managementSatisfactory
- Personal developmentGood
- Teaching and learningGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Satisfactory.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- 1 Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 9 of 11 Inspection Report: The Rose School, 3 February 2009 p.9
- The quality of teaching is generally good although this does range from lessons that are excellent to the occasional one that is unsatisfactory. p.11
- ■ use the information from its checks on how well you and the teachers are doing to help plan for the future ■ make even more of the teaching and learning good and outstanding. p.11
- Most pupils enjoy school and are positive about what is does for them. p.4
- You were polite and respectful to me and to the staff. p.11
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- A small proportion of schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory but which have areas of underperformance will receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection. p.5
- Although standards are low when comparing the pupils’ test and examination results with those of other pupils nationally the pupils make sound progress at this school from their starting points on arrival. p.5
- A few pupils make even better progress than this. p.5
- In 2007, a grade D was the highest grade achieved by a pupil in GCSE examinations. p.5
- However, in 2008, two pupils achieved a grade C in English and one a grade C in mathematics. p.5
- The school has recently improved its arrangements for tracking the progress pupils make. p.5
- A thorough analysis of these records is still to be undertaken. p.5
- However, tracking information suggests that the progress being made by individual pupils varies considerably from inadequate to outstanding but that overall it is satisfactory. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 3,067
- about usual (typical 2839)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 18%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
134625 Unique Reference Number Lancashire Local Authority 328937 Inspection number 3 February 2009 Inspection date Eric Craven HMI Reporting inspector
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Special Type of school Community special School category 11–16 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 40 School (total) The governing body Appropriate authority Cllr Tony Martin Chair Ms Nicola Jennings Headteacher 23 May 2006 Date of previous school inspection Swindon Street School address Burnley Lancashire BB11 4PF 01282 453 072 Telephone number 01282 426 842 Fax number
p.1
11–16 Age group 3 February 2009 Inspection date 328937 Inspection number .
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. 2 of 11 Inspection Report: The Rose School, 3 February 2009
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out by one of Her Majesty’s Inspectors of schools.
p.3
Description of the school
The Rose School opened in September 2005 and, as a consequence, no pupils have yet been at the school for their entire secondary education. The school provides for pupils with behavioural, emotional and social difficulties. Most have experienced a turbulent education, including exclusions and periods of absence, prior to attending this school. All of the pupils come from the area of East Lancashire. All have a statement of special educational needs or are being formally assessed. There are 15 girls on roll and six pupils are looked after by the local authority. Three quarters of the pupils are eligible for free school meals. Most of the pupils are white British with about one in six coming from an Asian heritage. The school is part of the Building Schools for the Future initiative and is due to be relocated into new buildings in September 2010.
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 11 Inspection Report: The Rose School, 3 February 2009
p.3
Grade: 3
The Rose School is providing a satisfactory education for its pupils and some aspects of its provision are good. Most of the pupils arrive with standards that are below average. This is because of their poor experiences of schooling, which for many have made them disaffected with education. However, because of the good work the school does in helping most of the pupils re-connect with learning, they make satisfactory progress overall. Pupils are helped to learn by the good care, guidance and support provided by staff and the generally good teaching that takes place. The good relationships pupils have with staff and the consistent management of their behaviour helps remove the barriers to their learning. Disruptive behaviour in lessons is dealt with decisively so that the effect of this on other pupils’ learning is minimised. Staff show respect for pupils who, in turn, generally do the same. Staff are vigilant with regard to the safety of pupils. The quality of teaching varies and includes the
p.4
Grade: 3
occasional unsatisfactory lesson but nevertheless it is good overall. Because of their previous experiences, many pupils find learning difficult and consequently their progress is restricted. However, the better teaching is helping to overcome the legacy of underachievement many pupils have when they arrive at the school. The pupils’ personal development is good. The behaviour of most pupils is good for most of the time, although a very small number of parents who responded to the questionnaire would disagree. Attendance, although still unsatisfactory, is on the rise. It is adversely affected by a small number of pupils and the school is working earnestly to increase their attendance and it has had some success. Most pupils enjoy school and are positive about what is does for them. They value the points they can earn and what they can achieve with these and this plays a big part in helping them manage their own behaviour. They feel able to go to members of staff for
p.4
Grade: 3
support if needed. Although they say there are a few instances of bullying, they feel these are dealt with effectively. Pupils have a good understanding of differences between cultures and individuals and the school’s good work on promoting community cohesion has been a stimulus for pupils’ learning in this area. Pupils make a valuable contribution to their school community and wider afield. They readily undertake jobs at school and they raise funds for those in need. The curriculum is satisfactory. It meets statutory requirements for what should be covered but it is hampered for two reasons. The amount of time devoted to teaching is below that recommended for secondary-age pupils. This is compounded as the school uses most of two afternoons each week for activities that are used as rewards for the pupils. The school has increased the range of externally accredited courses for pupils to follow and there has been an
p.4
Grade: 3
expansion of the use of alternative provision for some pupils. Enrichment activities are greatly valued by the pupils, especially the residential weekends that they all get a chance to attend. Leadership and management of the school are satisfactory with some good aspects. The headteacher and deputy headteacher are a cohesive team who have begun more recently to drive the school forward at an increased pace. Some necessary developments are in the early stages of development. For example, the school has begun to track the pupils’ progress more systematically, although an analysis of this data for groups of pupils and the whole school is still be completed. Quality assurance has become more systematic and the school is gathering information from a wider variety of sources to check on its success. Because these developments are fairly new, they are yet to make a significant impact on pupils’ achievements. The school
p.4
Grade: 3
improvement plan is a useful road-map for the school but it has insufficiently sharp measures 4 of 11 Inspection Report: The Rose School, 3 February 2009 to check on its success, particularly in terms of further improving the quality of teaching and improving the rate of progress pupils make. The school’s collaboration with parents and other professionals is good. The governing body brings good experience and commitment to its role as a critical friend of the school.
p.4
What the school should do to improve further
■ Use a wide range of strategies to improve levels of attendance.
p.5
What the school should do to improve further
■ Increase the amount of taught time in the school day so that the curriculum can make as full a contribution as possible to the progress pupils make. ■ Make better use of information gathered from assessments of pupils’ progress and monitoring of the quality of teaching and learning to make the targets in the school’s improvement plans more specific. ■ Increase the proportion of lessons judged to be good and outstanding.
p.5
What the school should do to improve further
A small proportion of schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory but which have areas of underperformance will receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection.
p.5
Grade: 3
Although standards are low when comparing the pupils’ test and examination results with those of other pupils nationally the pupils make sound progress at this school from their starting points on arrival. A few pupils make even better progress than this. In 2007, a grade D was the highest grade achieved by a pupil in GCSE examinations. However, in 2008, two pupils achieved a grade C in English and one a grade C in mathematics. The school has recently improved its arrangements for tracking the progress pupils make. A thorough analysis of these records is still to be undertaken. However, tracking information suggests that the progress being made by individual pupils varies considerably from inadequate to outstanding but that overall it is satisfactory. The poor attendance of a minority of pupils means that their academic achievements, as well as their personal and social development, are significantly impeded by
p.5
Grade: 2
Pupils take big strides forward in their personal and social development at this school. This is because staff show them respect and listen to them. They are encouraged to make a contribution and they do so readily. Some of the things pupils have suggested have been acted upon by the school, for example, at the pupils’ request, the school has developed a room where pupils can go to calm down. Pupils recognise their views are valued. Their appreciation of how to live healthier lifestyles has developed well. For example, increasing numbers of pupils are taking the opportunity to discuss smoking cessation with the school nurse. They also take up the opportunities given to them to engage in physical activity. Sometimes, pupils do challenge staff and show poor behaviour. However, most of the time when this occurs, they get ‘back on track’ fairly quickly. Pupils recognise what is acceptable behaviour and what is not. The incidents
p.5
Grade: 2
of poor behaviour that have required fixed periods of exclusion are falling. The pupils’ social, moral, spiritual and cultural development is good. The pupils receive a good preparation for life after school through work-related learning which begins in Year 7 and includes work experience and college placements in Key Stage 4. Since the school opened in 2005, the rate 5 of 11 Inspection Report: The Rose School, 3 February 2009 of attendance has been poor. A contributor to this has been the poor attendance of a few pupils who, despite the school’s best efforts, have not been prepared to engage in education. Some of these have now left the school. Strategies to provide part-time alternative provision for other disaffected pupils has helped improve the attendance rate considerably from what it was two years ago.
p.5
Grade: 2
The quality of teaching and learning varies but enough of it is good for it to be judged good overall. The characteristics of the good teaching observed were: lesson plans that include clear and measurable objectives for pupils to achieve during the lesson; teachers and teaching assistants working in harmony to provide support for those in need and; pupils being engaged by the work set for them. Less successful teaching, does not, for example, use the latter part of the lesson to check on pupils’ learning and to reinforce their learning well enough. The weaker teaching does not sufficiently raise the aspirations of the pupils so that they are eager to learn. The assessment of pupils has improved and is enabling the school to more readily identify pupils who underachieve. These pupils receive one-to-one support for literacy and numeracy. The numbers of pupils supported in this way has increased recently as the school
p.6
Grade: 2
has devoted more resources to this work. Some of these pupils make good progress as a result of the interventions.
p.6
Grade: 3
The curriculum has been strengthened by the recent inclusion of music on the timetable. Nevertheless, too little time is developed to subjects that can help improve the academic progress pupils make and to raise their standards. The school has used its available resources effectively to match the curriculum to pupils’ needs. For example, a few disengaged pupils have been provided with part-time placements with alternative providers which has increased their involvement in education. The headteacher recognises there are other pupils with poor attendance who could benefit from additional packages of provision such as these. Those who have earned sufficient points choose their activities on the two afternoons they are available. The few pupils who do not achieve their points undertake community service in the school. The activities on offer, including a girls’ club, meet the pupils’ needs and are valued by them.
p.6
Grade: 2
Staff care for the pupils well. Relationships between staff and pupils are good and there is mutual respect. Pupils receive effective support for their individual needs through their behaviour and curriculum targets. Pupils are well aware of these targets. They are all helped to make a contribution to their annual reviews by either attending the review, making a written contribution or both. Marking of work has improved but the headteacher is focused on making further improvements so that it consistently tells pupils how they can improve further. The school meets safeguarding requirements. Each pupil has a personal risk assessment and senior leaders follow requirements in respect of vetting staff and recording their suitability for employment. 6 of 11 Inspection Report: The Rose School, 3 February 2009
p.6
Grade: 3
Senior staff take soundings from pupils and parents to find out their views on how well the school is doing and, where appropriate, their views are acted upon. Recent improvements to the systems for tracking pupils’ progress and quality assuring teaching and learning and other aspects of the school’s work put the senior leaders in a better position to identify priorities for action. However, information from pupil assessments and monitoring does not inform the school improvement plan sufficiently fully. Curriculum co-ordinators are beginning to monitor the progress of pupils more systematically. Creditably, they have all recently audited their subjects and have action plans as a result. However, these lack sufficiently specific targets for improving the outcomes for pupils. Governors are committed and supportive and are good advocates for the school. They are well informed and ably led by the chair of governors who
p.7
Grade: 3
knows the school’s strengths and weaknesses. The governors fulfil their role well. Although progress was initially slow, the school has recently made inroads into the areas for development identified at its last inspection in 2006. However, attendance remains unsatisfactory. Its self-evaluation arrangements have improved and are now satisfactory and its capacity to improve further is sound. 7 of 11 Inspection Report: The Rose School, 3 February 2009 .
p.7
Grade: 3
in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 8 of 11 Inspection Report: The Rose School, 3 February 2009
p.8
Inspection judgements
School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate
p.9
needs of learners?
Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well being? 3 The capacity to make any necessary improvements
p.9
Achievement and standards
3 How well do learners achieve? 4 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and/or disabilities make progress
p.9
Achievement and standards
1 Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 9 of 11 Inspection Report: The Rose School, 3 February 2009
p.9
learners?
2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 The extent to which learners enjoy their education 4 The attendance of learners 2 The behaviour of learners 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being
p.10
learners' needs?
How well do the curriculum and other activities meet the range of needs and interests of learners? 2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?
p.10
and supporting all learners?
How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 3 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation 2 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination eliminated 2 How well does the school contribute to community cohesion? How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 10 of 11 Inspection Report: The Rose School, 3 February 2009
p.10
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
Dear Pupils Inspection of The Rose School, Lancashire, BB11 4PF Many thanks for the welcome you gave me when I inspected your school recently. I was pleased to meet three of you and a past pupil for a discussion about the school. I have judged that your school is providing you with a satisfactory education and that some of the work the school does is good. The progress you make at school is satisfactory. I found that your personal and social skills are good. Although a few pupils now and again do not behave well most of you are well behaved for most of the time. You were polite and respectful to me and to the staff. Your learning about healthy lifestyles is good. One of the reasons why you develop these good social skills is because staff look after you well and help you learn to behave well. The quality of teaching is generally good although this does range from lessons that are excellent to the occasional one that is unsatisfactory. The curriculum is also satisfactory and I
p.11
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
know you enjoy the options afternoons and the residentials you get the chance to attend. However, the school could help you achieve more if more time was given to lessons. Attendance is not good enough overall although I do realise that most of you attend quite well and a few of you attend all of the time. However, there are some pupils whose attendance is very poor and they are not benefiting from their education as a consequence. The senior staff are doing a sound job and some aspects of their work are good. There have been some recent improvements to the way they check how well you are doing and how the school is doing overall. This information is not always used well enough in making plans to further improve the school. The governing body are doing a good job. To help the school improve I have asked Ms Jennings and the governors to:
p.11
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
■ increase the time allocated for lessons during the school day
p.11
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
■ use the information from its checks on how well you and the teachers are doing to help plan for the future ■ make even more of the teaching and learning good and outstanding.
p.11
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
Please help all you can, particularly by attending the school every day, so that you learn as much as possible and can leave the school with as many qualifications as possible. Yours faithfully Eric Craven Her Majesty’s Inspector 11 of 11 Inspection Report: The Rose School, 3 February 2009
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion