Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Manchester Mesivta School

Inspected 28 Jan 2009 · published 17 Feb 2009 · URN 134195

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    28 Jan 2009

  • Inspectorssingle source

    John Coleman

  • Achievement verified

    Good

  • Care guidance support verified

    Outstanding

  • Curriculum verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Outstanding

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    M25 0PH

  • Name on report verified

    Manchester Mesivta School

  • URN verified

    134195

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2006.

  • OverallGood
  • AchievementGood
  • Care guidance supportOutstanding
  • CurriculumGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentOutstanding
  • Teaching and learningGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+76Very positivemore positive than 37% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingexcellenteffectiveexceptionallyconsistentlysuccessfulstrongstrengths
Criticisminadequateweaknessesbelowinconsistentweakerinsufficientlacknot strong

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1459w+78
  • What needs to improve1487w+72

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,917
about usual (typical 2775)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 47
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 49%What needs to improve 50%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Manchester Mesivta School Inspection report

p.1

134195 Unique Reference Number Bury Local Authority 328850 Inspection number 27–28 January 2009 Inspection dates John Coleman HMI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Secondary Type of school Voluntary aided School category 11–16 Age range of pupils Boys Gender of pupils Number on roll 165 School (total) The governing body Appropriate authority Mr I Shapiro Chair Mr P Pink Headteacher 23 March 2006 Date of previous school inspection Beechwood School address Charlton Avenue Prestwich Greater Manchester M25 0PH 0161 773 1789 Telephone number 0161 772 9170 Fax number

p.1

11–16 Age group 27–28 January 2009 Inspection dates 328850 Inspection number .

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. 2 of 11 Inspection Report: Manchester Mesivta School, 27–28 January 2009

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by one of Her Majesty's Inspectors and one Additional Inspector.

p.3

Description of the school

Manchester Mesivta is an orthodox Jewish school. There is an independent sixth form attached which is funded through links with a local further education college. The school was awarded voluntary aided status in 2004 and moved to its present site in new buildings in 2005. It is much smaller than most secondary schools and provides a dual curriculum where Jewish Studies are taught in the mornings and secular subjects in the afternoons. This inspection focused on the secular provision. The vast majority of pupils are White British and very few are eligible for free school meals. There are an average number of pupils with a statement of special educational need and most pupils speak English as their first language.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 11 Inspection Report: Manchester Mesivta School, 27–28 January 2009

p.3

Grade: 2

Manchester Mesivta School provides a good quality of education for its pupils. It has some outstanding features in the provision for the care, guidance and support of pupils and in the outcomes for their personal development. The school is very successful in achieving its aim to 'develop in pupils a passion for learning that will serve their needs throughout and beyond school'. Pupils have excellent attitudes to learning. Many pupils enter school with standards of attainment in English, mathematics and science which are above those found nationally. However, the range of pupils' prior attainment has increased over time, due to the changing nature of the school's intake from selective grammar school to comprehensive. The result is that there are a greater number of pupils who begin school with standards which are below average. The school curriculum is traditional and has historically been well matched to the needs of pupils in selective education. Standards attained

p.4

Grade: 2

by pupils are in the main above average and achievement is good, but the small number of lower attaining pupils do not achieve as well. The school leadership recognises this and has responded with more vocational choices on the curriculum. These are better matched to pupils' needs and are beginning to ensure that progress is good. It is too soon to measure the impact on exam results. Following the last inspection the school's leadership responded well to the recommendations. The headteacher has created a senior team which he leads with strong direction and the heads of department undertake an increasingly rigorous monitoring role. The governing body meets statutory requirements and provides good strategic management. Improvements to the quality of teaching mean it is now good due to effective staff development and successful governor policies for the recruitment and retention of staff. However, there is variation in the quality of

p.4

Grade: 2

lessons and this is due to the inconsistent implementation of the schools policies for teaching and marking. The leadership's view of the relative strengths of the school is an accurate one. The capacity of the school to improve is good. A good example of the evidence of this being the improvements made to the schools' provision for information and communication technology (ICT), which given the provisional results for 2008 resulted in all pupils achieving an equivalent A* to C GCSE grade and 85% of pupils gaining an A*/A equivalent grade. All staff have high expectations of pupils' behaviour and take a lead in this from the strong and visible presence of the headteacher. The school has a firm moral code which is consistently applied. As a result, pupils' behaviour in lessons and around the school is good and pupils say there is no bullying and they feel safe. The religious life of the school permeates every aspect

p.4

Grade: 2

of pupils' experiences. Pupils are provided with daily opportunities for self reflection and they develop respect for themselves and each other. Pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is outstanding. Relationships between staff and pupils are good, and are built upon the high level of care and interest which staff show towards pupils. The support and guidance for pupils' personal and academic needs are first class, including the contribution of the teaching assistants who work mainly with pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities. Pupils are encouraged to develop healthy lifestyles and the curriculum includes provision for drug and sex education.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

■ Develop the curriculum choices available for the lowest attaining pupils and increase the progress they make. 4 of 11 Inspection Report: Manchester Mesivta School, 27–28 January 2009 ■ Ensure the whole school policies for teaching and marking are consistently applied in all classes.

p.4

Grade: 2

Most pupils make good and sometimes outstanding progress. Standards are above average. Approximately 75% of pupils sit their GCSE examinations in Year 10 a year earlier than usual. In the last 3 years around 80% of pupils gained a minimum of five A* to C grades including English and mathematics which is well above the national average. The percentage of pupils achieving the top A* and A grades at 39% in 2008, as shown by provisional figures, is also very high. Pupil performance in some subjects is exceptional. As a result many pupils study AS levels in Year 11 and the success rate for these is high. A small number of pupils complete A levels before leaving the school. Pupils' progress in some subjects such as classical studies and Modern Hebrew is weaker due to difficulties in recruiting staff for these subjects. The progress of the lowest attaining pupils over time is also less strong, due to the traditional and academic nature

p.5

Grade: 2

of the curriculum being unsuited to fully meet their needs. This is being addressed by the school and pupils are now making good progress in more vocational subjects. It is too soon however for this to impact on pupils results in external examinations. Overall, pupils' achievement is good.

p.5

Grade: 1

Pupils' personal development and well-being are outstanding. Their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is outstanding with pupils being encouraged to think of others and show respect for all. Pupils are polite to visitors and are proud of their school. Attendance is good and pupils are appreciative of the efforts made by teachers and other adults who work on their behalf. 'We work well as a team' said one Year 11 pupil who also suggested that the school is improving year on year. The promotion of citizenship and self-respect gives pupils the confidence to live together in a harmonious community. Pupils value highly their own cultural heritage and have opportunities to discuss the diversity of other cultures in the world. Opportunities for pupils to develop leadership skills are promoted through a range of opportunities to be buddies for younger pupils, prefects or members of the school council. The council provides

p.5

Grade: 1

impressive support for charities, and pupils have opportunities to become involved in fundraising to provide wheelchairs for an African community. Pupils also speak very positively about helping others in their local community. Pupils use water fountains and eat fruit throughout the school day and they know why this is important to their health and well-being. This extends to the Sunday swimming classes that include other family members and parents. There are extensive corridor displays which heightened their awareness of the importance of a healthy choice food option.

p.5

Grade: 2

The overall quality of teaching and learning is good and ranges from satisfactory to outstanding. There are a wide range of teaching styles from formal instructional approaches to lessons which have an emphasis on practical activities and involve pupils in their own learning. The most 5 of 11 Inspection Report: Manchester Mesivta School, 27–28 January 2009 successful teachers are able to blend their approach to best suit the needs of the pupils and the content of the lesson. In all classes teachers plan thoroughly and demonstrate very good knowledge of the subjects they teach. Most lessons are aimed at an appropriate level of difficulty for pupils but, in some, the same expectation is made of all abilities and this slows the pace of learning. Pupils' attitudes towards their learning are excellent, and this contributes to the good progress they make. Relationships between pupils and with staff are good. Pupils know their

p.5

Grade: 2

attainment targets in English, mathematics and science, and in the best lessons teachers' marking provides effective guidance in relation to pupils' progress in achieving these. This is not consistent in all classes. Homework is set regularly and the school has an automated telephone system which allows pupils and parents easy access to the details of this. Pupils say that this greatly helps them if they forget or are absent for any reason. Classrooms are tidy and well managed, but most are a little bare and there are insufficient efforts to celebrate pupils' work and to motivate learning. Teaching assistants provide good and effective support and guidance for pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities.

p.6

Grade: 2

The curriculum is good. It meets all statutory requirements. In Key Stage 3 the secular curriculum is broad and balanced and in Key Stage 4 pupils have increasing opportunities to follow a wider range of courses that are suited to their interests and abilities. The school has improved its provision for ICT and worked with determination to improve vocational education. The small range of extra-curricular opportunities is appreciated by pupils and the more able, gifted and talented pupils are benefiting from enrichment opportunities. Pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities achieve as well as their peers and benefit from the work of teaching assistants who are focused on ensuring that all pupils do as well as they can. Pupils feel secure that teachers are working hard to help them do their best. The school places importance on the need to ensure that pupils follow courses that are best suited to their strengths and interests.

p.6

Grade: 2

For example, the curriculum pathways have been broadened to include subjects where pupils will perform best. This is indicative of the school's determination to provide a personalised curriculum for all pupils although the school recognises that there is still more to do in this regard.

p.6

Grade: 1

Care, guidance and support are outstanding. All statutory procedures are observed and measures to ensure health and safety are in place. Pupils feel valued and cared for. They feel safe and secure, always knowing that they have someone to help them when they need it. Vulnerable pupils value the support they are given. Pupils' well-being and the celebration of achievement is at the centre of all that the school does and, as a result, pupils grow with confidence into well-balanced young people who are well prepared for the next stage of their learning. Good relationships between teachers and pupils are evident throughout the school. The information on pupils' progress is shared with parents through review meetings and written reports, and appreciative comments from parents include, 'positive and caring school with a dedicated and hardworking teaching force'. Rewards and celebrations are an integral part of school life and

p.6

Grade: 1

this adds to pupils' enjoyment with many being pleased to receive the teachers' praise for good work done. An outstanding feature is the way that all pupils and staff work together within a caring community. 6 of 11 Inspection Report: Manchester Mesivta School, 27–28 January 2009

p.6

Grade: 2

The leadership and management of the school are good. The headteacher provides clear direction, and he inspires the staff with his passionate love of the school and through his determination to improve the quality of education which it provides. Since the last inspection a new senior leadership team is in place which provides an effective monitoring role to measure the school's performance. Challenging targets are set for pupils' attainment, which are largely met. There is increasing delegation of leadership responsibilities to heads of department who are knowledgeable about the standards attained in their subjects. This is because staff know each individual pupil very well and they track the progress which they make. The school's evaluation of its relative strengths and weaknesses is an accurate one. Action plans to improve the school give a broad outline of intentions but they lack quantifiable ways of measuring their

p.7

Grade: 2

success. The governing body is well led by a knowledgeable chair. The clerk to the governors is instrumental in the development of suitable committees, systems and structures which ensure they are able to fulfil their strategic role. Governors are well informed by the headteacher. Most governors are also parents of pupils in the school. They provide appropriate challenge to the school's leadership. The transition from a selective grammar school to maintained comprehensive has been well managed. The school's contribution to community cohesion is good and equality of opportunity is provided through the increasing choice of curriculum options. The school provides good value for money. 7 of 11 Inspection Report: Manchester Mesivta School, 27–28 January 2009 .

p.7

Grade: 2

in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 8 of 11 Inspection Report: Manchester Mesivta School, 27–28 January 2009

p.8

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

needs of learners?

Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well being? 2 The capacity to make any necessary improvements

p.9

Achievement and standards

2 How well do learners achieve? 2 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and/or disabilities make progress

p.9

Achievement and standards

1 Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 9 of 11 Inspection Report: Manchester Mesivta School, 27–28 January 2009

p.9

learners?

1 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 1 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 The extent to which learners enjoy their education 2 The attendance of learners 2 The behaviour of learners 1 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.10

learners' needs?

How well do the curriculum and other activities meet the range of needs and interests of learners? 1 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.10

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 2 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation 2 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination eliminated 2 How well does the school contribute to community cohesion? How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 10 of 11 Inspection Report: Manchester Mesivta School, 27–28 January 2009

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Inspection of Manchester Mesivta School, Prestwich, M25 0PH On behalf of Mr Cooper and myself I would like to thank you for making us feel so welcome when we visited your school recently. We enjoyed meeting you and talking to you about your school. Manchester Mesivta is a good school. Your headteacher and all of the staff and governors provide excellent care, guidance and support for you. The teachers are very knowledgeable about their subjects and deliver good quality lessons. You learn well because of this good teaching but also because you work very hard, concentrate well and behave as you should. The school is excellent at helping you to develop into mature and responsible young people with the appropriate skills which you will need in the future. The academic standards which many of you reach are high including English, mathematics and information and communication technology. Although most of the teaching is good, we want the lessons which are less good to improve.

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

As a result, we have asked teachers to use the school's guidance about lessons more consistently. We have also asked the school to make sure your work is marked better. Although there are more choices available to you when you begin your GCSE courses, we have told the school it should provide even more options. We wish you every success in the future. 11 of 11 Inspection Report: Manchester Mesivta School, 27–28 January 2009

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion