Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
Horningsham Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
11 Mar 2009
- Inspectorssingle source
Deborah Zachary
- Achievement verified
Good
- Care guidance support verified
Good
- Curriculum verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Outstanding
- Teaching and learning verified
Good
- Name on report verified
Horningsham Primary School
- URN verified
126199
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2005.
- OverallGood
- AchievementGood
- Care guidance supportGood
- CurriculumGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentOutstanding
- Teaching and learningGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- You also have an excellent understanding of social and moral matters, and your behaviour is outstanding. p.11
- 1 Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 9 of 11 Inspection Report: Horningsham Primary School, 11 March 2009 p.9
- Good teaching and strong support and guidance ensure that pupils achieve well in academic subjects, and their personal development is outstanding. p.4
- They have an extremely strong voice in the way the school is developing. p.4
- Parents are extremely positive about the way it educates and looks after their children. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Last year's Year 6 group included a high proportion of pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities. p.5
- Because of this, standards were broadly average at the end of the year, but pupils still achieved well. p.5
- Progress in writing was identified by the school as slower than in other areas. p.5
- The current Year 6 pupils are on track to reach high standards, and they have made very good progress in writing, in response to improvements the school has made. p.5
- Progress is good throughout the school, and a little faster in Key Stage 2 than elsewhere. p.5
- In Key Stage 1 and the Early Years Foundation Stage, progress in one subject or area sometimes slows, but progress remains good overall and the pupils tend to catch up the next year. p.5
- Pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities make progress as rapidly as their peers. p.5
- Pupils' experience of evaluation and development planning and their understanding of their own learning are preparing the pupils extremely well for the future. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,807
- about usual (typical 2775)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Horningsham Primary School Inspection report
p.1
126199 Unique Reference Number Wiltshire Local Authority 328465 Inspection number 11 March 2009 Inspection date Deborah Zachary Reporting inspector
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. The registered childcare, managed by the governing body, was inspected under section 49 of the Childcare Act 2006.
p.1
Primary Type of school Community School category 5–11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 69 School (total) 0 Government funded early education provision for children aged 3 to the end of the EYFS 0 Childcare provision for children aged 0 to 3 years The governing body Appropriate authority Jason O' Connell Chair Carole Andrews Headteacher 13 October 2005 Date of previous school inspection Not previously inspected Date of previous funded early education inspection Not previously inspected Date of previous childcare inspection Church Street School address Horningsham Warminster BA12 7LW 01985 844342 Telephone number 01985 845294 Fax number
p.1
5–11 Age group 11 March 2009 Inspection date 328465 Inspection number .
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. 2 of 11 Inspection Report: Horningsham Primary School, 11 March 2009
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out by two Additional Inspectors.
p.3
Description of the school
The school is much smaller than average. It has three classes, with more than one year group in every class. For example, pupils in the Early Years Foundation Stage are in a class with pupils from Year 1. The proportion of pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities is below average, but they are not evenly distributed so the level can be high in some year groups. The school draws its pupils from the village and surrounding area. Most of the pupils are from White British backgrounds. The school shares its site with First Steps Nursery at School House, which is not managed by the school governors and is subject to a separate inspection.
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 11 Inspection Report: Horningsham Primary School, 11 March 2009
p.3
Grade: 2
This is a good school. Parents are extremely positive about the way it educates and looks after their children. Good improvements have been made since the last inspection, and the school is set to continue to improve rapidly because the headteacher has established very effective monitoring systems and a committed team of staff who share her vision. Good teaching and strong support and guidance ensure that pupils achieve well in academic subjects, and their personal development is outstanding. Many of the parents' questionnaires returned greatly praised the school's ethos, one describing it as an 'exceptionally friendly school'. The pupils do have a great care and concern for each other, and behaviour is excellent. They have an extremely strong voice in the way the school is developing. They have written their own 'SEF' – a self-evaluation form which assesses how well the school performs – and a 'children's development plan' to show the direction they think
p.4
Grade: 2
it should take. These include success indicators, what resources will be needed, and how the pupils intend to check that actions take place as planned. Unsurprisingly, this process reflects the very good planning of the adult leaders of the school. They know the strengths and weaknesses of the school well, and have demonstrated in the significant improvements made to teaching and to pupils' writing skills that the school has a good capacity to improve even more. The very small size of the school means that different year groups come in with very different skills and experiences. However, pupils of all abilities make good progress from their varied starting points. Progress is best in Key Stage 2, and the current Year 6 pupils are on track to reach high standards by the time they leave. Teaching for this age group is particularly good, and pupils much enjoy their lessons. The school makes sure that pupils of all abilities benefit
p.4
Grade: 2
from a very interesting curriculum too. They are very well cared for by all adults. One parent summed it up by writing, 'The care, commitment and imagination the staff show in engaging the children to learn are amazing.' Another of the school's particular strengths is the way pupils are helped to understand what they are aiming to achieve in a lesson or over a few weeks. This especially applies in Key Stage 2, although younger pupils also have personal targets and they too understand them well. Longer-term targets are also set for pupils so that the school's managers can track whether or not pupils are doing as well as they should. The targets for Key Stage 2 pupils are very challenging, but those for pupils in Key Stage 1 do not always take sufficient account of how well the pupils did when they were in the Early Years Foundation Stage. As a result, pupils in Key Stage 1 tend to exceed the targets fairly easily.
p.4
Grade: 2
The children get a good start in the Early Years Foundation Stage. They are nurtured and cared for and relationships with parents are good. Although they are taught alongside Year 1 pupils, they get plenty of opportunities to learn at their own level. Teaching is good, and the children are making good progress. Activities are well chosen within a context that interests the children. For example, during the inspection, the theme of 'Humpty Dumpty' led to some challenging work outside with an adult, working out how to build a wall that was secure. There is a good balance of activities led by adults and independent learning indoors, for example role play in 4 of 11 Inspection Report: Horningsham Primary School, 11 March 2009 the 'castle'. The outside area is secure but thin and narrow, with no shelter, and accessed by steps. At the moment it is not particularly inviting and children cannot use it freely as an
p.4
Grade: 2
extension of the classroom. This puts a restriction on the curriculum, although teachers work hard to make sure all areas of learning are covered. The school is well aware of areas that it wants to improve in the Early Years Foundation Stage, including outdoor learning. It is rightly looking to extend links with a wider range of nurseries. It has also identified that progress could be accelerated in personal, social and emotional development. Whilst standards are high in this area of learning at the end of the Early Years Foundation Stage, personal, social and emotional skills are often already high when children enter the school.
p.5
What the school should do to improve further
■ Sharpen the longer-term target-setting process for pupils in Key Stage 1, so that full account is taken of the attainment at the end of the Early Years Foundation Stage. ■ Improve the outside area for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage.
p.5
Grade: 2
Last year's Year 6 group included a high proportion of pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities. Because of this, standards were broadly average at the end of the year, but pupils still achieved well. Progress in writing was identified by the school as slower than in other areas. The current Year 6 pupils are on track to reach high standards, and they have made very good progress in writing, in response to improvements the school has made. Progress is good throughout the school, and a little faster in Key Stage 2 than elsewhere. In Key Stage 1 and the Early Years Foundation Stage, progress in one subject or area sometimes slows, but progress remains good overall and the pupils tend to catch up the next year. Pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities make progress as rapidly as their peers.
p.5
Grade: 1
Pupils' experience of evaluation and development planning and their understanding of their own learning are preparing the pupils extremely well for the future. Pupils also have the opportunity to learn about enterprise through a club at which they make goods to sell and raise money, and have a good understanding of recycling. Their moral and social development is excellent, and they willingly take up their many roles and responsibilities. Younger pupils and older pupils play happily together. They have a good understanding of how to stay healthy and safe. Many year groups described what was healthy about their school meals and snacks in their 'SEF'. Older pupils demonstrate very good ability to reflect on their work, for example in poems based on Martin Luther King's famous I have a dream speech. In assembly pupils showed that they are developing a mature understanding of people's similarities and differences, and
p.5
Grade: 2
Teachers plan well and explain the ideas of each lesson very clearly. They make sure that the main part of the lesson has challenge for pupils of different abilities. In mathematics in Years 5 of 11 Inspection Report: Horningsham Primary School, 11 March 2009 2 and 3, for example, all the pupils were adding using a particular method, but the most able had three-digit numbers and word problems to sort out whilst the youngest or less able worked on smaller numbers. Support is often provided by teaching assistants, who are also skilled at explaining and questioning. Teachers often use resources particularly well. In an outstanding lesson for pupils in Years 4 to 6, they studied a picture and listened to sounds that might be associated with it in order to stimulate their ideas for story openers. The use of 'talk partners' to rehearse sentences or ideas is particularly effective. Very occasionally, whole-class
p.5
Grade: 2
introductions to lessons do not challenge the most able pupils sufficiently well and their progress slows as a result.
p.6
Grade: 2
The curriculum is organised on the basis of two-year and three-year rolling programmes to make sure that pupils learn new things as they stay in a class for more than a year. Year 1 pupils, in addition, benefit from resources such as the role-play area which are available for younger pupils. Conversely, however, the limited outside area restricts possibilities for them as well as the Early Years Foundation Stage. The day-to-day curriculum is greatly enhanced by activities such as whole-school focus weeks in which work in real depth is undertaken. A very wide range of visits and visitors also make a strong contribution, and the school is quick to draw in people from the village or visitors who can explain what life is like elsewhere in this country or abroad. As a result, pupils have positive attitudes towards different faiths and cultures. Tailored activities are provided for pupils who are gifted and talented as well as for those who have learning
p.6
Grade: 2
difficulties and/or disabilities. These have included learning Finnish or Chinese and working remotely with a poet based in the Antarctic.
p.6
Grade: 2
The school's leaders are well aware of the context in which it works, and adults know all about the pupils and their backgrounds. Appropriate steps are taken to give support where needed, for example to ensure that no-one misses out on school trips for financial reasons. A range of useful measures promote good attendance, although current attendance is average; in a small school, bouts of illness can have a disproportionate impact on the figures. Marking is very effective in giving guidance on how to improve work, especially for the oldest children. Safeguarding requirements are met, in spite of the fact that the school premises and particularly the grounds, which are on various different levels, present challenges. The school is doing what it can to implement a range of measures to reduce problems.
p.6
Grade: 2
The headteacher provides very good leadership and management, and is supported well by other responsibility holders. She has secured a highly inclusive ethos and has led the school to significant improvements. Teaching is monitored very regularly, not only by the headteacher but also by other staff who observe each other with an agreed focus. This illustrates the way the drive for improvement is shared by all. The tracking of pupils' standards and progress is also very detailed, although targets set for Key Stage 1 are based on performance at the start of Year 1 rather than earlier achievements. Governors challenge and support the school well. 6 of 11 Inspection Report: Horningsham Primary School, 11 March 2009 With several governors new to their posts, including the chair, they are rightly going through a process of identifying policies and updating plans for reviewing them.
p.6
Grade: 2
■ Pupils were highly positive in their 'SEF' about the school's leadership. They couldn't think of areas of leadership to improve and one group summed it up by saying:'…the leaders and managers in the school are super as: ■ they listen to you
p.7
Grade: 2
■ there is always someone to help'. 7 of 11 Inspection Report: Horningsham Primary School, 11 March 2009 .
p.7
Grade: 2
in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 8 of 11 Inspection Report: Horningsham Primary School, 11 March 2009
p.8
Inspection judgements
School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate
p.9
needs of learners?
Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well being? 2 The capacity to make any necessary improvements
p.9
EYFS?
2 How well do children in the EYFS achieve? How good are the overall personal development and well-being of the children in the EYFS? 2 How effectively are children in the EYFS helped to learn and develop? 2 How effectively is the welfare of children in the EYFS promoted? 2 How effectively is provision in the EYFS led and managed?
p.9
Achievement and standards
2 How well do learners achieve? 2 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and/or disabilities make progress
p.9
Achievement and standards
1 Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 9 of 11 Inspection Report: Horningsham Primary School, 11 March 2009
p.9
learners?
1 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 The extent to which learners enjoy their education 3 The attendance of learners 1 The behaviour of learners 1 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being
p.10
learners' needs?
How well do the curriculum and other activities meet the range of needs and interests of learners? 2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?
p.10
and supporting all learners?
How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 2 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation 1 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination eliminated 2 How well does the school contribute to community cohesion? How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 10 of 11 Inspection Report: Horningsham Primary School, 11 March 2009
p.10
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
12 March 2009 Dear Pupils Inspection of Horningsham Primary School, Warminster BA12 7AW Thank you for welcoming us when we visited your school yesterday. You gave us a very clear idea of what the school is like, both through your 'SEF' and through what you told us when we talked to you. Your school is good. We agree with you that you are 'getting really good' in your work – in fact you are making good progress and standards are rising. We found some things that are outstanding, for example the way you yourselves contribute to the school through your development plan for improving writing. You also have an excellent understanding of social and moral matters, and your behaviour is outstanding. We agree with you that teaching is good, and you told us how much you enjoy being in school. You have a good understanding of how to improve your work because teachers are good at explaining it. The youngest children get a good start in the Robins class. However, we have
p.11
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
asked the school to look at how the outdoor area where they play could be improved, so that children can learn as much outside as they do inside. I'm sure you will have lots of ideas about how this could be done and will be able to help with the planning. We think your school is led very well. The headteacher and staff check what you do closely so that they can spot areas of your work where they can help you improve. We have asked them to look again at the way they check the progress of pupils in Years 1 and 2. This is just to be absolutely sure they take into account everything you have done in the Early Years Foundation Stage (which is the official name for your first year at school – often called Reception). With best wishes. Yours faithfully Deborah Zachary Lead inspector 11 of 11 Inspection Report: Horningsham Primary School, 11 March 2009
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion