Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Richmond Methodist Primary School

Inspected 9 Oct 2008 · published 30 Oct 2008 · URN 121544

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    9 Oct 2008

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Lesley Clark

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    Richmond Methodist Primary School

  • URN verified

    121544

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2006.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+69Positivemore positive than 20% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyoutstandingexceptionallyhigh qualityexceptionalexemplaryexcellententhusiasm
Criticisminadequateweaknessseriousnot confidentbelowinsufficientnot sufficientlyslowly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings2055w+69
  • What needs to improve240w+49

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,172
shorter than usual (typical 2775)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 47
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
3
typical 8
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 85%What needs to improve 10%About the inspection 5%

Full report text

Richmond Methodist Primary School Inspection report

p.1

121544 Unique Reference Number North Yorkshire Local Authority 327509 Inspection number 9 October 2008 Inspection date Lesley Clark Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. The registered childcare, managed by the governing body, was inspected under section 49 of the Childcare Act 2006.

p.1

Primary Type of school Voluntary controlled School category 5–11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 302 School (total) 0 Government funded early education provision for children aged 3 to the end of the EYFS 0 Childcare provision for children aged 0 to 3 years The governing body Appropriate authority Mr R Fothergill Chair Mr M Allison Headteacher 18 January 2006 Date of previous school inspection Not previously inspected Date of previous funded early education inspection Not previously inspected Date of previous childcare inspection Darlington Road School address Richmond North Yorkshire DL10 7BH

p.1

5–11 Age group 9 October 2008 Inspection date 327509 Inspection number 01748 822794 Telephone number 01748 821292 Fax number

p.1

5–11 Age group 9 October 2008 Inspection date 327509 Inspection number .

p.2

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.3

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. 3 of 10 Inspection Report: Richmond Methodist Primary School, 9 October 2008

p.3

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by one Additional Inspector. The inspector evaluated the overall effectiveness of the school and investigated the following issues: pupils' achievement; the quality of teaching and learning; pupils' personal development; and the curriculum. Evidence was gathered from: the school's self-evaluation; national published assessment data and the school's own assessment records, policies and minutes; observation of the school at work; interviews with senior members of staff and pupils; and the parents' questionnaires. Other aspects of the school's work were not investigated in detail, but the inspector found no evidence to suggest the school's own assessments, as given in the self-evaluation, were not justified, and these have been included where appropriate in the report.

p.4

Description of the school

Richmond Methodist Primary School is larger than average. Pupils come from a wide range of backgrounds including urban areas, rural villages, farms and a military base. Almost all are White British. The proportion of pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities is below average overall, but in most classes there is a small group with significant learning difficulties and/or disabilities. The number of pupils with a statement of special educational need is above average. Children join the Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) in the Reception year, with the younger children starting at half-time for the first term. The headteacher was appointed in January 2007. A third of the teaching staff has changed since then. The school was extended last year to provide additional teaching space and the grounds developed to enhance outdoor play for the whole school.

p.4

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 4 of 10 Inspection Report: Richmond Methodist Primary School, 9 October 2008

p.4

Grade: 2

This is a good school which gives its pupils a well rounded education. A notable strength is the high quality provision for creative arts which plays a large part in pupils' enormous enthusiasm for school and their delight in learning. An area of relative weakness is the EYFS where much of children's learning is too formal too soon. Parents appreciate 'the increased focus on art, sport and music' and most agree that this is, 'A very happy school which provides good support for its children and cares and nurtures individuals.' The school knows itself well and has the right priorities. Its self-evaluation is largely accurate, but the school tends to underplay its strengths because of its strong focus on raising achievement. The school has made good improvement since the last inspection. Good leadership and management by the leadership team, fully supported by a knowledgeable governing body, have been instrumental in bringing

p.5

Grade: 2

about effective changes. Pupils' learning has been revitalised through exciting and interesting lessons and a well thought out curriculum. The school has good capacity to improve further because of this relentless drive for all pupils to make the best possible progress. The quality of teaching is good in Years 1 to 6. There are examples of outstanding practice, especially in: the quality of teachers' questions; the many different practical activities set; the tireless and expert support of teaching assistants; and the excellent relationships between adults and children. These qualities promote pupils' good achievement. Science results in national tests are especially good because pupils learn through investigation and discovery. It is no wonder that they find learning highly enjoyable. From slightly above average starting points in Year 1 pupils go on to reach well above average standards by the end of Year 6. Pupils

p.5

Grade: 2

with learning difficulties and/or disabilities and those who are the most able do especially well. This is because the work challenges them effectively at their different levels. Consequently, almost all pupils reach the expected level at the end of Year 6 and the most able reach the higher level. Exceptional mathematicians work comfortably within even higher levels. The school has identified a small group of learners, those who are at the upper end of average, who make slower progress. Current strategies to raise their achievement are beginning to work, albeit slowly. A factor in their slower progress is that all pupils are not fully involved in checking their learning. At present, pupils who are less confident with new concepts do not get the help they need quickly enough. This is especially true in mathematics and to a certain extent in writing, despite extremely good marking systems in both subjects.

p.5

Grade: 2

The curriculum is good and offers pupils a breadth of experience because it draws connections between subjects so as to make learning more relevant. Activities that enrich the curriculum are outstanding. A two-week art project resulted in pupils throughout the school producing high quality, vibrant, large scale acrylic paintings, silk prints and glazed tile works. Many pupils play in the school's orchestra and small ensemble groups. Well established links with schools in other countries give pupils an insight into different cultures and a sense of being part of a wider community. Pupils' good personal development is underpinned by their exemplary behaviour and good attendance. Pupils know why it is important to lead healthy lives and their energetic play at break-times together with their enthusiasm for sports ensure they are fit. They are well cared for and say they feel safe in school. Procedures for safeguarding pupils fully meet requirements.

p.5

Grade: 2

The school helps pupils to recognise and appreciate the diversities of the world in which they live. As a result they are articulate, self-assured, cheerful young people who are confident, take responsibilities as a matter of course and have a lively interest in learning. These skills and 5 of 10 Inspection Report: Richmond Methodist Primary School, 9 October 2008 qualities certainly help them make an excellent contribution to the community. School councillors explained, 'We need to try to make a difference' and gave their decision to install a lift in school as an example. Pupils say that assemblies help them deal with things that matter to them in their daily lives. This is why they talk openly about serious issues and say with conviction: 'Everyone's really nice here and if you're new you don't have to worry.' Pupils are certainly well prepared for their future lives.

p.5

Grade: 3

By the end of the Reception year most children meet, and a good proportion exceed, the levels expected, especially in their personal, social and emotional development and early literacy and numeracy skills. This is satisfactory progress from their slightly above average starting point. They are taught satisfactorily. While adults undoubtedly care for children well, which helps them settle in quickly, there are insufficient opportunities for children to direct their own learning. Tasks are weighted towards those directed by adults, especially those promoting children's early reading, writing and number skills. The school has identified this and the fact that the children's outdoor area for learning does not as yet offer children the widest opportunities. Teachers do organise instructive and clearly fascinating activities, for example, encouraging children to join together long plastic pipes and then pour water (and cars!) down

p.6

Grade: 3

them. However, adults do not use the potential of using these sorts of activities to extend children's problem solving, reasoning skills or their understanding of the world. This is because observing children's learning and then planning activities to help them make the next steps are not fundamental to the way learning is organised. The school has suitable plans to develop ready access to outside for younger children, who currently have an extended playtime in the outdoor area. The EYFS is managed satisfactorily with strengths in resources, displays and promoting children's welfare. Nevertheless, there are limitations in the way provision is planned which is not sufficiently based on what children need to learn next.

p.6

What the school should do to improve further

■ Involve pupils more fully in checking their learning so they get the instant help they need to enable them to make faster progress. ■ Give Reception children more time to learn on their own and to choose from a wide range of interesting indoor and outdoor activities that cover all areas of their learning and challenge them to think for themselves. ■ Ensure that observations of what Reception children know and can do are used by staff to plan the next steps in their learning. 6 of 10 Inspection Report: Richmond Methodist Primary School, 9 October 2008 .

p.6

What the school should do to improve further

in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 7 of 10 Inspection Report: Richmond Methodist Primary School, 9 October 2008

p.7

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.8

needs of learners?

Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well being? 2 The capacity to make any necessary improvements

p.8

EYFS?

3 How well do children in the EYFS achieve? How good are the overall personal development and well-being of the children in the EYFS? 3 How effectively are children in the EYFS helped to learn and develop? 2 How effectively is the welfare of children in the EYFS promoted? 3 How effectively is provision in the EYFS led and managed?

p.8

Achievement and standards

2 How well do learners achieve? 2 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and/or disabilities make progress

p.8

Achievement and standards

1 Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 8 of 10 Inspection Report: Richmond Methodist Primary School, 9 October 2008

p.8

learners?

2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 1 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 1 The extent to which learners enjoy their education 2 The attendance of learners 1 The behaviour of learners 1 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

learners' needs?

How well do the curriculum and other activities meet the range of needs and interests of learners? 2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 2 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation 2 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination eliminated 2 How well does the school contribute to community cohesion? How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 9 of 10 Inspection Report: Richmond Methodist Primary School, 9 October 2008

p.9

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Thank you very much for the warm welcome you gave me when I inspected your school recently. Lots of you smiled and chatted to me and I felt comfortable and welcome. I thoroughly enjoyed finding out about the work you do and a special thanks to those who talked with me about the school and brought their English, mathematics and science books to show me. Your school gives you a good all round education. These are the best things about your school:

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

■ your art work and music making are impressive

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

■ you achieve well, especially in science, and some of you are first-rate mathematicians

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

■ your teachers make learning fun and that is why you really enjoy your lessons

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

■ your school is run well and all the staff spend a lot of time thinking how they can help you all to make the best possible progress. There are three things I have asked your school to do to make it even better.

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

■ It would help those of you who are less confident or who find some parts of learning easy and other parts difficult, if your teachers thought of a way in which you could tell them what puzzles you. You could then get the help you need very quickly, and this would help you to make faster progress. ■ I have asked the school to make sure that Reception children have a lot more time to learn on their own both indoors and outdoors and have lots more interesting things to do that make them think and work things out by themselves. ■ I have asked the staff in Reception class to note down what the children know and can do and to use this information to help them plan the next steps in children's learning. 10 of 10 Inspection Report: Richmond Methodist Primary School, 9 October 2008

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion