Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Gisburn Primary School

Inspected 3 Feb 2009 · published 27 Feb 2009 · URN 119270

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    3 Feb 2009

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Kathleen McArthur

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    Gisburn Primary School

  • URN verified

    119270

Page 8 of 9
Page 8 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2006.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+69Positivemore positive than 20% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexcellenteffectivelyenjoyexceptionallyoutstandingmake good progressconsistentlyeffective
Criticismnot alwaysinadequatebelowinconsistencyinconsistencieslimitednot yetnot confident

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings2032w+68
  • What needs to improve210w+63

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,107
shorter than usual (typical 2775)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 47
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 8
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 87%What needs to improve 9%About the inspection 4%

Full report text

Gisburn Primary School Inspection report

p.1

119270 Unique Reference Number Lancashire Local Authority 326984 Inspection number 3 February 2009 Inspection date Kathleen McArthur Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. The registered childcare, managed by the governing body, was inspected under section 49 of the Childcare Act 2006.

p.1

Primary Type of school Community School category 4–11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 109 School (total) 0 Government funded early education provision for children aged 3 to the end of the EYFS 0 Childcare provision for children aged 0 to 3 years The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs Jane Wilson Chair Mrs Catherine Grimshaw Headteacher 3 May 2006 Date of previous school inspection Not previously inspected Date of previous funded early education inspection Not previously inspected Date of previous childcare inspection Burnley Road School address Gisburn Clitheroe Lancashire BB7 4ET 01200 445406 Telephone number 01200 415981 Fax number

p.1

4–11 Age group 3 February 2009 Inspection date 326984 Inspection number .

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. 2 of 9 Inspection Report: Gisburn Primary School, 3 February 2009

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by two Additional Inspectors The inspectors evaluated the overall effectiveness of the school and investigated the following issues: the attainment of boys, provision in the Early Years Foundation Stage and pupil involvement in the assessment of their learning. Evidence was gathered from the school’s self-evaluation, national published assessment data, and classroom observations. Discussions were held with staff, pupils and governors, and parents’ questionnaires were scrutinised. Other aspects of the school’s work were not investigated in detail but the inspectors found no evidence to suggest that the school’s own assessments, given in its self-evaluation were not justified.

p.3

Description of the school

The school is smaller than most and draws pupils from a wide rural area. There are four mixed age classes. Provision is made for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage in the mixed Reception/Year 1 class. The proportion of pupils receiving a free school meal is well below average. The great majority of pupils are of White British heritage. A lower than average proportion of pupils has learning difficulties and/or disabilities. The headteacher has been in post for just over one year. The school holds National Healthy schools status and has gained Activemark.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 9 Inspection Report: Gisburn Primary School, 3 February 2009

p.3

Grade: 2

This is a good school that gives good value for money. Pupils’ personal development is outstanding. They are very happy, healthy, and keen to learn and participate enthusiastically in everything the school offers; one said, ‘I can’t think of anything that could be better!’ Good leadership and governance has ensured good improvement since the previous inspection and has firmly implemented the vision to enhance provision for every pupil. Parents are very supportive, saying the school is welcoming, friendly and approachable with a strong community spirit. Achievement is good. Pupils make good progress and, by the time they leave, standards are consistently above average. School data shows that in 2008 Year 6 pupils achieved particularly well. They reached standards that are well above average at both the expected and higher levels. Progress accelerates in Years 3 to 6 where teaching is strongest. Standards are above

p.4

Grade: 2

average at Key Stage 1, but have shown a downward trend in recent years; standards in mathematics were average in 2008. This reflects some inconsistency in the use of assessment information to match work to pupil’s differing abilities, and boys have not always achieved as well as girls. Actions to remedy this are proving effective, including adapting the curriculum to suit boy’s more active, investigational learning style and targeted literature to capture their interest. Provision for spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is excellent. High levels of attendance show that pupils really enjoy school and value their education. They work hard, achieve well, reflect quietly on spiritual and emotional matters and have a keen sense of right and wrong. Pupils say there is no bullying and feel confident to seek help from staff with any problems. Their views are listened to through regular class forums or the ‘suggestion box’.

p.4

Grade: 2

Pupils show very good awareness of how to look after their health and stay safe, and are eager to take on responsibilities such as escorting younger pupils safely at home time. Behaviour is good overall and some excellent behaviour was observed, for example in the dining room and during assembly and in the older classes. Teaching is good overall. The best teaching sets high expectations and inspires pupils to achieve more. In these lessons, learning moves along at a lively pace, well directed questions keep pupils on their toes and staff make good use of assessment information to plan work that challenges all abilities. Consequently, pupils work hard and progress well. There are inconsistencies however and, where these good practices are not implemented, progress is slower. The curriculum is good. Literacy, numeracy, science and information and communication technology receive priority and there is a good balance with other subjects. Pupils talked

p.4

Grade: 2

animatedly about celebrating Chinese New Year through music, a lion dance, writing and a banquet. This theme really enriched the curriculum and contributed most effectively to their cultural awareness. Children in the Early Years Foundation Stage do not have enough opportunities to extend their learning outside. The wide range of after-school clubs is very popular and pupils enjoy meeting with other schools at sports events. Pupils are well cared for and show care and concerned for others. Staff know pupils and their families well, and welcome parents as partners in their children’s education. Good provision and support for pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities ensures they can access all activities and progress well in their learning. Safeguarding arrangements meet current requirements. Systems to track academic progress are fully in place and, in most classes, are 4 of 9 Inspection Report: Gisburn Primary School, 3 February 2009

p.4

Grade: 2

used well to direct extra help and set individual, group and whole school targets. Pupils know their targets well and say, ‘We aim for high standards so we can have a good life when we are older’. Pupils report that teachers’ marking shows them how to improve their work and, in the older classes, they ‘self-assess’ their work. For example, Years 3 and 4 pupils used checklists of success criteria when writing ‘thank you’ letters to an imaginary Chinese aunt. Good leadership by the headteacher is fully supported by staff, governors and parents. The leadership team has good knowledge of what needs to be done to improve provision and implements focused strategic plans. However some curriculum leaders do not always have enough opportunities to observe lessons to allow them to monitor more effectively the work in their subjects areas. The school has evaluated its contribution to community cohesion well and taken good action at different levels. Pupils gain awareness and understanding of the

p.5

Grade: 2

diverse nature of lifestyles and cultures in Britain and the wider world through themed weeks and links with schools in contrasting locations. Governance is good. Governors are skilfully led, question and hold the school to account, and ensure equal opportunities are successfully promoted. The budget is very carefully managed to support improvement plans. The school has good capacity for further improvement.

p.5

Grade: 3

Children enter school with skills broadly typical for their age; this varies from year to year because year groups are small. The warm, friendly environment and good arrangements for care and welfare make children feel safe, happy and ready to learn. Overall, progress is satisfactory, and good in personal and social development. Children know how to share, take turns and stay healthy and they concentrate well on their chosen activities. Teaching and the curriculum are satisfactory and provide a suitable balance of adult and child led activities. Children have limited opportunities to extend their learning outside. The new class teacher is working hard to develop procedures to assess what children know and can do. This information is not yet used to full effect, so learning activities do not always match children’s differing capabilities. Leadership and management is sound, with a clear view of developments needed

p.5

Grade: 3

in key aspects, such as data collection, the outdoor learning area and to enhance staff skills. By the time children move to Year 1, most reach the learning goals expected for their age.

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

■ In the Early Years Foundation Stage create further opportunities for children to extend their learning outside and use assessment more effectively to make sure learning is closely matched to children’s different capabilities. ■ Ensure the most effective teaching practices are applied consistently in all classes.

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

■ Develop further opportunities for subject leaders to monitor standards and provision. 5 of 9 Inspection Report: Gisburn Primary School, 3 February 2009 .

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 of 9 Inspection Report: Gisburn Primary School, 3 February 2009

p.6

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.7

needs of learners?

Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well being? 2 The capacity to make any necessary improvements

p.7

EYFS?

3 How well do children in the EYFS achieve? How good are the overall personal development and well-being of the children in the EYFS? 3 How effectively are children in the EYFS helped to learn and develop? 2 How effectively is the welfare of children in the EYFS promoted? 3 How effectively is provision in the EYFS led and managed?

p.7

Achievement and standards

2 How well do learners achieve? 2 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and/or disabilities make progress

p.7

Achievement and standards

1 Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 of 9 Inspection Report: Gisburn Primary School, 3 February 2009

p.7

learners?

1 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 1 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 1 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 1 The extent to which learners enjoy their education 1 The attendance of learners 2 The behaviour of learners 1 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.8

learners' needs?

How well do the curriculum and other activities meet the range of needs and interests of learners? 2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.8

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 2 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation 2 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination eliminated 2 How well does the school contribute to community cohesion? How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 8 of 9 Inspection Report: Gisburn Primary School, 3 February 2009

p.8

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

4 Feb 2009 Dear Pupils Inspection of Gisburn Primary School, Lancashire, BB7 4ET I would like to thank you all for the very friendly welcome we received during our visit. We had a very enjoyable day and you were all really polite and helpful. We were very impressed by the way you care for each other, older ones helping the younger ones and doing many jobs around the school. You told us how much you enjoy school and your parents said they are pleased with the school. This letter is to tell you what we found. You go to a good school. The headteacher and governors provide good leadership. You work hard, make good progress and standards are higher than in many schools. Although teaching is good overall, we have asked the leaders to make sure you are always taught well. The older ones told us they know how to check their work to see how well they are doing. You get a satisfactory start in your Reception year but we have asked the school to help you make faster

p.9

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

progress here and to make sure you have opportunities to learn outdoors. Your personal development is excellent, so you understand how to look after your health and feel very safe, and your attendance is very good. You have excellent manners and behave very well; we didn’t hear anyone complain about having to stay inside when the playground was very slippery! The curriculum is good with many extra things; French, music, residential visits and lots of clubs. We wish we had been there for the Chinese New Year banquet during your celebrations! You are well cared for and teachers check your progress carefully. We have asked the school to make sure leaders have time to carefully check what is happening in each subject so that they can plan for the best improvements. We hope you will continue to work hard and enjoy being at Gisburn School. With best wishes to you all Kathleen McArthur Lead inspector 9 of 9 Inspection Report: Gisburn Primary School, 3 February 2009

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion