Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)
Down Ampney Church of England Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
12 May 2009
- Name on report verified
Down Ampney Church of England Primary School
- URN verified
115664
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Pupils are highly effective ambassadors for the school and have a wide range of forums in which to make an excellent contribution to the school and local community. p.5
- In an outstanding mathematics lesson, for example, Year 5 pupils made exceptional progress in understanding the concept of negative and positive numbers. p.6
- The school’s mission statement, ‘Work Hard, Have Faith, Be Happy, Stay Safe Together’, devised by the pupils themselves, precisely reflects the school’s friendly and extremely caring and supportive learning environment. p.4
- Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. p.10
- An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. p.10
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 12
- Words of findings
- 3,573
- about usual (typical 3042)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Age group 4–11 Inspection date(s) 12 May 2009 Inspection number 326245 Down Ampney Church of England Primary School Inspection report
p.1
Unique Reference Number 115664 Local Authority Gloucestershire Inspection number 326245 Inspection dates 12 May 2009 Reporting inspector Julia Coop
p.1
This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 under pilot arrangements; it was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act .
p.1
Type of school Primary School category Voluntary controlled Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number on roll School (total) 42 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Mr P Baillie Headteacher Mrs C Martin Date of previous school inspection May 2006 Date of previous funded early education inspection May 2006
p.1
School address Down Ampney Cirencester Gloucestershire GL7 5QR Telephone number 01793 750294 Fax number 01793 750605 Email address admin@downampney.gloucs.sch.uk Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.1
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
Introduction
This pilot inspection was carried out by two additional inspectors. The inspectors visited seven lessons, and held meetings with governors, staff and pupils. A group of pupils also showed inspectors around the school. The inspectors observed the school’s work, and looked at the school’s data on pupils’ progress, the school improvement plan and procedures for keeping pupils safe. Seven parental questionnaires were returned and scrutinised by the inspection team, who also spoke with a number of parents to seek their views about the school.
p.3
Introduction
The inspection team reviewed many aspects of the school’s work. It looked in detail at the following:
p.3
Introduction
The effectiveness of the Early Years Foundation Stage in developing independent learning and communication skills. How well teachers use assessment information to plan activities matched to pupils’ different abilities. How well teachers maximise progress, particularly for more able pupils in Key Stage 1 and especially in writing, and for middle ability pupils in Key Stage 2, particularly in science. How well key skills, particularly writing skills, are developed within subjects across the curriculum. The impact of leadership and management on improving provision and outcomes and promoting all strands in community cohesion.
p.3
Information about the school
This is a much smaller than average two-class village primary school. Almost all of the pupils are from White British backgrounds. A very small proportion of the pupils do not speak English when they start in the school. The current proportion of pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities is above the national average, but this varies each year. Early Years Foundation Stage provision is provided in the Key Stage 1 class that includes Year 1 and 2 pupils. The school has close links with a pre-school located in the school grounds; this is not managed by the governing body and has been inspected separately. Pupils are taught by four part-time teachers. The headteacher also has a part- time teaching commitment. There have been significant staff changes in recent years; in addition, longer-term maternity leave has resulted in the employment of temporary staff. Recently the youngest pupils were taught in the school hall whilst urgent repairs were
p.3
Inspection judgements
Grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
p.4
Main findings
The school’s mission statement, ‘Work Hard, Have Faith, Be Happy, Stay Safe Together’, devised by the pupils themselves, precisely reflects the school’s friendly and extremely caring and supportive learning environment. It also reflects the pupils’ positive attitudes to school, good personal development and their exceptional contribution to the school and village community. The school’s good and improving performance is not only due to the clear and determined leadership of the headteacher and hard-working and enthusiastic team of staff, but also to the pupils’ good work ethic, which stems from a strong Christian ethos.
p.4
Main findings
Since the last inspection, despite staff changes and other disruptions, there has been a trend of rising standards at the end of Year 6. In relation to their very varied starting points in the Early Years Foundation Stage, pupils now achieve well. By the end of Year 6 their attainment in English, mathematics and science is above average. This is because teaching is now good, with some outstanding practice that is driving learning forward. There are common strengths in teaching. Lessons are fun and all staff have good relationships with the pupils. Some teachers are very adept in probing and consolidating pupils’ understanding in lessons through well-directed questioning. They expertly judge when to provide additional challenge to the most able pupils and frequently check on pupils’ understanding by checking their work regularly. However, the rate of progress made by pupils in Key Stage 1, especially for
p.4
Main findings
the most able, is not as consistent as in the rest of the school. There is more still to do to ensure that activities planned are consistently challenging and pupils are helped to understand what they need to do to improve their work. Reception children are making good progress and confidently work alongside the older pupils, although currently opportunities for them to make the choice to work outside and further develop independent learning skills are more limited.
p.4
Main findings
Subject leaders and governors have also developed their roles well since the last inspection. This is vitally important in a small school where the headteacher has a teaching commitment and the part-time staff hold several posts of responsibility. Governors and leaders have high aspirations for the school, work closely with other schools and have set a precise path for improvement based on accurate and candid self-evaluation. As a result, there is awareness that in order to nurture skills that lift pupils’ achievement further, more opportunities are required for them to develop extended writing skills and also build scientific investigative skills. In addition, the school recognises that older pupils could be helped even more to develop the necessary skills to evaluate their own learning, particularly in mathematics.
p.4
Main findings
The history of improvement, together with the culture of shared responsibility and the school’s increasingly robust practices, shows that the school is well placed to make further improvements.
p.5
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Increase the rate of progress from satisfactory to good in Key Stage 1 by: - ensuring that teaching activities consistently challenge the most able pupils - making sure that all pupils are clear about what they need to do to improve through marking and talking with teachers - ensuring questions are used consistently to probe and extend pupils’ learning during and at the end of lessons - providing more opportunities for pupils to write in their own words in other subjects.
p.5
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Promote excellence in learning, particularly in writing and in science in Key Stage 2, by: providing regular opportunities for pupils to plan and undertake their own science investigations, recording findings in their own words ensuring pupils have wider opportunities to perfect and extend their writing skills in other subjects developing even more precise individual learning targets that can be used by pupils to improve their work, particularly in mathematics helping pupils develop skills of self-assessment through regular opportunities to review their own work in lessons.
p.5
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Extend opportunities for children in the Reception class to learn independently particularly through increased outdoor learning opportunities.
p.5
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2
Pupils enjoy coming to school, which is reflected in their good attendance. Pupils’ enthusiastic application to work in lessons observed makes an important contribution to their good achievement. They are flexible learners not thrown by changes to routines. For example, during the inspection some pupils were sitting national tests and assessments for part of the day, which meant a different timetable. Despite this, pupils adapted to the changed routine and only required small reminders to keep concentrating on the task in hand. The school is a harmonious community and the safe, nurturing environment enables vulnerable pupils, such as those with troubled lives or those new to learning English, to build confidence and make good progress. An impressive feature is the way that pupils look out for each other and especially their friends with learning difficulties and/or disabilities and those from different
p.5
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2
Pupils are highly effective ambassadors for the school and have a wide range of forums in which to make an excellent contribution to the school and local community. This includes work experience in the pre-school, involvement in the village gardening club, and caring for the younger pupils at play or around school.
p.5
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2
Evidence from pupils’ work in books shows good progress is typical for most pupils. This was confirmed in lessons observed, where pupils mainly made good progress. Sometimes learning was excellent. In the very best lessons observed the pupils were highly involved in learning. Perceptive questioning and practical activities really challenged their thinking. In an outstanding mathematics lesson, for example, Year 5 pupils made exceptional progress in understanding the concept of negative and positive numbers. Through the teacher’s probing questioning and by their 100% involvement in an imaginative practical game, pupils said that they had been helped to ‘learn difficult stuff in a fun way’.
p.6
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2
Improved identification and support for pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities has led to these pupils making better progress than in past years. The school is also effective in helping pupils who arrive without speaking English to make good progress in developing speaking and comprehension skills. In addition, middle ability pupils are being helped to reach their challenging targets across the school and especially in science in Key Stage 2, where specialist teaching is helping them to extend their skills. However, in general, pupils’ investigative skills are a weaker aspect of learning in science. The main reason why learning is sometimes more satisfactory than good in Key Stage 1 is because class teachers are not as confident to plan more challenging activities for the most able pupils and do not use questioning to extend their learning.
p.6
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2
Pupils have a good understanding of what it means to lead a fit and healthy life, although a few pupils recognise they find it hard to maintain a healthy diet. Pupils have a good understanding of different cultures and reflect carefully on those who are less fortunate than themselves. Through their productive links with a school in the Czech Republic they are gaining a good understanding of the wider world, although their understanding of different faith groups is not quite as strong.
p.6
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2
These are the grades for pupils’ outcomes Pupils’ attainment 1 2 The quality of pupils’ learning and their progress 2 The quality of learning for pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities and their progress How well do pupils achieve and enjoy their learning? 2 To what extent do pupils feel safe? 2 How well do pupils behave? 2 To what extent do pupils adopt healthy lifestyles? 2 To what extent do pupils contribute to the school and wider community? 1 Pupils’ attendance 1 2 How well do pupils develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being?
p.6
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2
1 The grades for attainment and attendance are: 1 is high; 2 is above average; 3 is broadly average; and 4 is low What is the extent of pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development? 2
p.6
How effective is the provision?
The foundation for good achievement is an improved and interesting curriculum and the teaching that encourages pupils to work hard and do their best. Good professional development opportunities and productive partnerships with other small schools have helped new teachers effectively develop their skills and helped enrich the curriculum. As a result, teachers have become more adept at planning for the wide range of ages and abilities in each of the two classes. Teachers also expect pupils to complete a good range and quantity of work, especially in Years 5 and 6, where work is substantial, of high quality and progress most rapid.
p.7
How effective is the provision?
At the heart of the curriculum, teaching and learning is the development of pupils’ key skills within the core subjects of English, mathematics and science. This is aided by the careful analysis of data to identify where extra support is needed or pinpoint where skills need to be developed. Dividing the Key Stage 2 class into two teaching groups for English and mathematics is successfully increasing achievement for all groups of pupils. Across the school, teachers have also successfully identified a number of opportunities for pupils to write in different styles in other subjects. However, this opportunity for pupils to hone their writing skills is restricted by the overuse of writing frames, which limits personal creativity and flair. Teachers have also introduced more practical approaches to helping pupils progressively develop their knowledge, skills and understanding. However, whilst investigation is a common
p.7
How effective is the provision?
feature in science, this is too often teacher directed and investigation planning frames restrict opportunities for pupils to explore and reason like ‘young scientists’.
p.7
How effective is the provision?
Opportunities to discuss ideas with others and a good balance between class, group and individual work are common strengths in teaching. The school has introduced curriculum targets for pupils and this is helping them to recognise in general terms what they need to work on. Pupils like these targets but occasionally do not understand them, such as those in mathematics where words used such as ‘derive’ confuse pupils. Some marking is perceptive and promotes a discussion with pupils, who are then very clear about how they can improve. But this is not consistent and the school recognises that strategies to sharpen pupils’ knowledge of their own learning could be enhanced further.
p.7
How effective is the provision?
Pastoral care, support and guidance is outstanding and pupils say how very much they appreciate the kindness of staff. Individual pupils receive expert professional help and high quality support from a very wide variety of agencies. Pupils’ remark positively about opportunities for them to make visits out of school, and the range of additional activities, such as knitting, mini enterprise schemes, French and sporting activities, is impressive for a small school. By the time they reach Year 6, whilst sad to leave this happy school, all pupils are very successfully guided and prepared to transfer to the next stage of their education.
p.7
How effective is the provision?
These are the grades for the quality of provision The quality of teaching 2 The use of assessment to support learning 2 The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils’ needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships The effectiveness of care, guidance and support 1
p.7
How effective are leadership and management?
The headteacher sets the tone for the effective teamwork and the shared ambition for further success that permeates the school. The school knows its good points but equally knows what it needs to do to improve further. The strategic plan for improvement is a perceptive and detailed document that establishes an effective foundation for furthering the school improvement journey. The school has already introduced initiatives which have begun to improve progress in science and writing and further enhance the quality of teaching. The inclusion and safety of pupils is given a high priority so that pupils achieve well whatever their backgrounds. Procedures for safeguarding are monitored carefully. The governing body ensures that it is well informed so that it can be both supportive and challenging. Staff and governors keep a close check on the possible impact of their actions on community cohesion, but strategic planning to meet this duty, particularly to further establishing
p.8
How effective are leadership and management?
links with different faith groups, is currently being developed by the governing body.
p.8
How effective are leadership and management?
These are the grades for leadership and management The effectiveness of leadership and management in communicating ambition and driving improvement The effectiveness with which the school promotes equality of opportunity and tackles discrimination The effectiveness of safeguarding procedures 2 The effectiveness of the governing body in challenging and supporting the school so that weaknesses are tackled decisively and statutory responsibilities met The effectiveness of the school’s engagement with parents and carers 2 The effectiveness of partnerships in promoting learning and well-being 2 The effectiveness with which the school promotes community cohesion 2 The effectiveness with which the school deploys resources to achieve value for money
p.8
Early Years Foundation Stage
Children make a smooth transition into Reception, aided by close links with the pre- school. Adults provide a safe environment which children learn to use with confidence and enjoyment. Progress in communication, language and literacy, a previously weaker area of teaching and learning, is improving. This is the result of the more effective teaching of letters and sounds and through encouraging the children’s social and communication skills in more interesting ways. This means that although some children start school with limited communication skills for their age, they are quickly making up for lost ground. Children benefit from the good example set by older pupils and clear expectations from their teachers and teaching assistant. Teaching and learning are good, and during the inspection, children were observed enjoying identifying which three-dimensional shapes can ‘roll’ or ‘not roll’. From their
p.8
Early Years Foundation Stage
different starting points most children reach expected levels, and a few more able children exceed them.
p.9
Early Years Foundation Stage
Planning for indoor learning is good, especially for the teaching of key skills, but there are missed opportunities to link indoor and outdoor learning. For example, currently, the ‘Garden Centre’ is the theme for role play indoors, but this is not mirrored in the outdoor learning. The children still tend to regard the outdoor area as a place to play rather than as also a place to work. On occasions there is an overemphasis on adult-led activities and this restricts their independence. Leadership and management of the Early Years Foundation Stage are good. Recent changes in staffing have been positive and build on much stronger identification of areas of underperformance and positive action to address these.
p.9
Early Years Foundation Stage
Outcomes for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage 2 The quality of provision in the Early Years Foundation Stage 2 The effectiveness of leadership and management in the Early Years Foundation Stage Overall effectiveness of the Early Years Foundation Stage 2
p.9
Views of parents and carers
The rate of response of the questionnaires to inspectors is below the usual number for this size of school. Inspectors, however, spoke to several parents, who were all very happy with the school and particularly value the small class and how well staff know their children. There were no particular trends in the very small number of written criticisms received by inspectors.
p.9
Views of parents and carers
Ofsted invited all the registered parents and carers of pupils registered at Down Ampney to complete a questionnaire about their views of the school. If a parent has more than one child at the school, we ask them to record an answer against all the questions, for each of their children. The inspection team received 7 completed questionnaires. In total, there are 42 parents and carers registered at the school.
p.9
Views of parents and carers
Always Most of the time Occasionally Never Overall, I am happy with my child’s experience at this school 5 2 0 0
p.9
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. In 2007–8, 15% of schools were judged to be outstanding. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. In 2007–8, 49% of schools were judged good. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. In 2007–8, 32% of schools were judged satisfactory. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves. In 2007–8, 5% of schools were judged inadequate.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning, training or development. This may refer to the acquisition of skills, knowledge, understanding or desired attributes. Attributes include qualities or personal competencies which are important to the development of the pupil; for example personal, social, cultural, emotional or health.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving. Inspectors base this judgement on what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school. 13 May 2009
p.10
Ampney GL7 5QR
Thank you so much for the warm welcome you gave us when we inspected your school recently. Thank you also to those of you who talked to us about your school and showed us around the school. You are lucky to have such an extensive range of visits and visitors that help make your learning enjoyable. We agree with you that you go to a good school.
p.11
Ampney GL7 5QR
You make an impressive contribution to the school and local community. This is because everyone at the school takes very good care of you. As a result, you are confident and we know that the Year 6 pupils are being helped very successfully for the move to your new bigger schools in September. You all have good relationships with your teachers, who encourage you to try hard and make good progress. You enjoy learning, particularly when activities are practical and challenging. We were impressed with the way that you look out for each other. The headteacher, governors and other staff work as a team to make your school successful. We have asked them to work on a few things to make your school an even better place to learn:
p.11
Ampney GL7 5QR
In Year 1 and 2, make sure that work is not too easy for some of you and teachers help you to improve your work. Make your learning excellent in Key Stage 2 by ensuring that you are helped to review your own learning, especially in mathematics. Ensure that older pupils have more opportunities to plan and undertake investigations in science. Plan more opportunities for you to write at length in other subjects. Make sure that Reception children have wider opportunities to learn and develop when they work outside.
p.11
Ampney GL7 5QR
I hope you go on trying hard and enjoying all of the interesting activities which help you learn so well.
p.11
Ampney GL7 5QR
Julia Coop (Lead inspector) procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk.
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion