Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Branscombe Church of England Primary School

Inspected 14 Nov 2008 · published 11 Dec 2008 · URN 113348

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    14 Nov 2008

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Janet Simms

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    Branscombe Church of England Primary School

  • URN verified

    113348

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2005.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+72Very positivemore positive than 25% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexcellenteffectivelyvery wellexceptionallymake good progressoutstandingimprovedenjoy
Criticismlimitedinadequateweaknessesconcernslacksinsufficientbelownot rigorous

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings2146w+72
  • What needs to improve204w+49

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,217
shorter than usual (typical 2775)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 47
Average sentence
24 words
Next steps
3
typical 8
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 86%What needs to improve 8%About the inspection 6%

Full report text

Branscombe Church of England Primary School Inspection report - amended

p.1

113348 Unique Reference Number Devon Local Authority 325798 Inspection number 14 November 2008 Inspection date Janet Simms Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. The registered childcare, managed by the governing body, was inspected under section 49 of the Childcare Act 2006.

p.1

Primary Type of school Voluntary controlled School category 4–11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 50 School (total) 0 Government funded early education provision for children aged 3 to the end of the EYFS 0 Childcare provision for children aged 0 to 3 years The governing body Appropriate authority Nicholas Edwards Chair Katie Gray Headteacher 16 September 2005 Date of previous school inspection Not previously inspected Date of previous funded early education inspection Not previously inspected Date of previous childcare inspection Branscombe School address Seaton EX12 3DA 01297 680339 Telephone number 01297 680549 Fax number

p.1

4–11 Age group 14 November 2008 Inspection date 325798 Inspection number

p.1

Amended Report Addendum

Report amended due to administration error

p.2

Amended Report Addendum

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Amended Report Addendum

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. 2 of 9 Inspection Report: Branscombe Church of England Primary School, 14 November 2008

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by two Additional Inspectors who evaluated the overall effectiveness of the school and investigated the following: progress in writing, speaking and listening and whether achievement is even across all years pupils' understanding of their progress and how independent they are as learners aspects of assessment. The inspectors gathered evidence on the day from discussions with staff, pupils, governors and others. A range of school documentation was examined and first-hand evidence was gathered from observing pupils in lessons and at play. Parents' views were gathered from questionnaires completed prior to the inspection and through talking to some at the start of the day. Other aspects of the school's work were not investigated in detail, but inspectors found no evidence to suggest that the school's own assessments, as given in its self-evaluation, were not justified, and these have been included where appropriate in this report.

p.3

Description of the school

This is a very small rural school with three mixed-age classes. Children enter the Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) Reception class in either September or January and a breakfast club is provided. The roll is falling because larger year groups at the higher end of the school are being replaced with smaller numbers of younger pupils. The school is located on a severely limited site with very small play areas. Numerous absences amongst a very small staff recently have necessitated an unusually high proportion of supply and cover teaching, with one of the three classes covered by a supply teacher for the day of inspection. The school holds awards for Basic Skills, as a Healthy School, Silver awards as an Eco School and for its Travel Plan, an Active Schools Mark and as an Investor in People.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 9 Inspection Report: Branscombe Church of England Primary School, 14 November 2008

p.3

Grade: 2

This is a good school. Pupils of all abilities make good progress in their academic work and their personal development is outstanding. Numbers are very small so standards vary year on year, but when they start school, children's skills are broadly as expected for those of a similar age. They leave with excellent social awareness and high levels of confidence and maturity. From their earliest experience in Reception, pupils gain great benefits from working with pupils of different ages in their classes. Challenging targets have been met or exceeded recently and current standards match those in recent Year 6 groups, which have been significantly above average. Pupils therefore move on with very secure basic skills to prepare them for future learning. Progress in writing has improved, as has pupils' competence in speaking and listening. Standards at Year 2 have been average, but younger pupils' achievement is accelerating, following a new staff appointment. Good

p.4

Grade: 2

additional support for vulnerable pupils, such as those with English as an additional language or with learning difficulties, enables them to achieve as well as others. A particular strength is pupils' excellent understanding of healthy lifestyles, especially the links between these aspects and sustainable living and environmental issues. The rural location alone is ideal to reinforce this understanding, but the school maximises these advantages well through its interesting curriculum and enrichment opportunities, such as the active Eco-club and excellent use of the school's allotment. Pupils' understanding of cultural diversity is more limited and the school acknowledges the need to extend this experience. Teaching and learning are good and staff know all pupils very well, making sure that their extensive contributions to school and community life are respected and valued. Pupils feel safe because staff provide a high level of pastoral care and individual support or challenge where

p.4

Grade: 2

needed. A significant number of parents who responded to the inspection questionnaire, particularly those of older pupils, expressed disquiet about changes to staffing and the structure of class groupings as numbers on roll fall. The school and its advisors are striving to manage this as effectively as possible, but governors recognise that recent advance speculation has derailed their plans to communicate with parents as well as they would have wished. Other parents are extremely supportive of the school, confirming inspection findings that recent improvements, particularly to EYFS and Years 1/2 provision, have helped their children settle quickly and make good progress. Pupils speak articulately about their enjoyment of school, a view which almost all parents endorse, even where they express other misgivings. Staff and governors recognise that the need for supply and cover teaching resulting from staff absence for training or medical

p.4

Grade: 2

necessities, sometimes disturbs learning, but the school does its best to minimise this. Parents overwhelmingly appreciate the good progress their children make in Years 5/6 and the solid preparation they have for their experience in secondary schools. Measures to rectify an identified dip in progress in Years 3/4 have been successful, and improved tracking now shows that achievement has evened out across the school. The accuracy of assessment, about which the school had concerns at Key Stage 1, has improved. Pupils' 'progress books' show good development of key skills, with standards properly assessed, but most assessment does not involve pupils sufficiently well in understanding how they can help themselves to move forward. Marking, for instance, does not usually inform pupils about specific targets, so their 4 of 9 Inspection Report: Branscombe Church of England Primary School, 14 November 2008

p.4

Grade: 2

understanding of how they can improve in the short term is limited. Good use of partnerships with other organisations overcome difficulties such as those imposed by restricted accommodation and space. Sports opportunities, for instance, are well extended by using the nearby village hall and sports coaches from a partner school. The governing body's relatively inexperienced members are very keen to take up available training opportunities and eager to support the school. Self-evaluation is good, with school judgements matching those found on inspection. Positive relationships with the school's improvement partner and with the local authority are helping to steer staff through prevailing turbulent times. The school rightly judges its leadership and management as satisfactory, recognising strengths and assessing accurately areas which require improvement, such as aspects of governance and relationships with some

p.5

Grade: 2

parents. With its new governing body, improved EYFS and Key Stage 1 provision, and a track record of sustaining good achievement from the previous inspection, the school has good capacity to develop further. Statutory aspects of monitoring and evaluation, such as observations of teaching for performance management, are carried out properly, but the school lacks a rigorous method of monitoring the quality of teaching of all staff. Insufficient identification of strengths and weaknesses in teaching provides an insubstantial basis upon which to build a common school-wide programme to improve learning. Recent reorganisation of the small staff into teams with responsibility for different areas of learning is usefully distributing accountability more widely, but it is too early to judge its effects.

p.5

Grade: 2

Provision in EYFS is good and is improving. Children achieve well and make good progress from starting points which are typical of children of this age. They develop well as happy independent learners, gaining enormous benefit from working and playing with older pupils in their class. Language skills, for instance, are developing well through interactions with Year 1/2 pupils who happily help to extend the vocabulary of these young classmates. A spacious indoor classroom and well-sheltered outdoor space provide a stimulating learning environment which caters well for all areas of the curriculum. Resources are good and children enjoy their learning, supporting and encouraging each other to do their best. Staff take every opportunity to develop and challenge children further, using all aspects of the EYFS learning programmes effectively indoors and outside. They ensure that children are safe and the school complies with statutory

p.5

Grade: 2

requirements. Leadership and management of EYFS are good and the new manager of this phase is continuing to improve provision. Staff work well as a team, balancing the needs of these younger children effectively with other demands in this mixed age environment. Progress for EYFS pupils is speeding up and staff are skilled at assessing and recording children's individual achievements.

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

■ Implement a programme to monitor and evaluate teaching across the school and identify improvements needed to increase learning. ■ Involve all staff in developing individual short-term target setting so that pupils understand the next steps in learning and how they can help to achieve these. 5 of 9 Inspection Report: Branscombe Church of England Primary School, 14 November 2008 .

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 of 9 Inspection Report: Branscombe Church of England Primary School, 14 November 2008

p.6

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.7

needs of learners?

Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well being? 2 The capacity to make any necessary improvements

p.7

EYFS?

2 How well do children in the EYFS achieve? How good are the overall personal development and well-being of the children in the EYFS? 2 How effectively are children in the EYFS helped to learn and develop? 2 How effectively is the welfare of children in the EYFS promoted? 2 How effectively is provision in the EYFS led and managed?

p.7

Achievement and standards

2 How well do learners achieve? 2 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and/or disabilities make progress

p.7

Achievement and standards

1 Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 of 9 Inspection Report: Branscombe Church of England Primary School, 14 November 2008

p.7

learners?

2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 1 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 1 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 1 The extent to which learners enjoy their education 2 The attendance of learners 2 The behaviour of learners 1 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.8

learners' needs?

How well do the curriculum and other activities meet the range of needs and interests of learners? 2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.8

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 3 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation 2 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination eliminated 3 How well does the school contribute to community cohesion? How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 8 of 9 Inspection Report: Branscombe Church of England Primary School, 14 November 2008

p.8

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

28 November 2008 Dear Pupils Inspection of Branscombe CE Primary School, Seaton EX12 3DA Thank you so much for welcoming us into your school when we came for the inspection. It was a pleasure to be there and to be in your classes, talk to some of you and to look at your work. I am writing to tell you what we found out.

p.9

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

■ Yours is a good school where you progress well in your work. We were particularly pleased to see how outstandingly well you develop personally, as mature, sensible young people. You work and play together very well, especially with children of different ages, helping and supporting each other. ■ Your standards are high by the time you leave the school, so you possess good skills levels when you move on to your next schools. We found that the progress of younger pupils is speeding up. ■ Some of your parents are concerned about what will happen when there are fewer pupils in school, but we found that staff, governors and other adults are preparing as well as they should for the future. ■ Teaching is good, so you learn lots of interesting things very well. We were particularly impressed with your understanding of healthy lifestyles, environmental issues and how you and you teachers use your allotment and the surrounding countryside and coastline to make

p.9

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

work interesting and enjoyable. Even in a good school, there are things which would make it better still, so we have asked the school to do the following:

p.9

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

■ We have asked adults to observe more lessons so they can identify what would make your learning even better. ■ We feel that you could be more involved in understanding your targets, especially older pupils, to know exactly how you can help yourselves to reach these and improve your own work more independently. We feel you can help the school to do these things because you have very sensible and mature attitudes and really enjoy learning. Thank you again. Yours faithfully Janet Simms Lead inspector 9 of 9 Inspection Report: Branscombe Church of England Primary School, 14 November 2008

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion