Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Newham Bridge Primary School

Inspected 16 Oct 2008 · published 10 Nov 2008 · URN 111585

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    16 Oct 2008

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Andrew Scott

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    Newham Bridge Primary School

  • URN verified

    111585

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2006.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+72Very positivemore positive than 27% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexcellentoutstandingeffectivelyexceptionallyeffectiveimprovedconsistentlysuccessfully
Criticismweaknessesconcerninadequatebelowtoo fewnot sufficientlylowyet to

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings2057w+73
  • What needs to improve197w+41

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,121
shorter than usual (typical 2677)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 47
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 8
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 90%What needs to improve 9%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Newham Bridge Primary School Inspection report

p.1

111585 Unique Reference Number Middlesbrough Local Authority 325406 Inspection number 16 October 2008 Inspection date Andrew Scott Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. The registered childcare, managed by the governing body, was inspected under section 49 of the Childcare Act 2006.

p.1

Primary Type of school Community School category 3–11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 271 School (total) 0 Government funded early education provision for children aged 3 to the end of the EYFS 0 Childcare provision for children aged 0 to 3 years The governing body Appropriate authority Cllr Ron Lowes Chair Mrs Jennifer Howes Headteacher 1 April 2006 Date of previous school inspection Not previously inspected Date of previous funded early education inspection Not previously inspected Date of previous childcare inspection Cayton Drive School address Acklam Middlesbrough TS5 7NJ 01642 816884 Telephone number 01642 816 889 Fax number

p.1

3–11 Age group 16 October 2008 Inspection date 325406 Inspection number .

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. 2 of 9 Inspection Report: Newham Bridge Primary School, 16 October 2008

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by one Additional Inspector. The inspector evaluated the overall effectiveness of the school and investigated the following issues.

p.3

Introduction

■ The effectiveness of the school’s approach to raising standards, especially in mathematics, but also in writing. ■ Teachers’ expectations of more able pupils and those from ethnic minorities.

p.3

Introduction

■ The impact of the curriculum on standards in the core subjects.

p.3

Introduction

Evidence was gathered from observations of lessons, analyses of pupils’ work, performance data, parents’ questionnaires and the school’s documentation, and from discussions with pupils, staff and governors. Other aspects of the school’s work were not investigated in detail, but the inspector found no evidence to suggest that the school’s own assessments, as given in its self-evaluation, were not justified, and these have been included where appropriate in this report.

p.3

Description of the school

This is a larger than average urban school. There is a mixed intake of pupils, but a large majority of the pupils come from districts where socio-economic conditions are below average. Most pupils are from White British families; a few have Asian backgrounds and 4% of pupils speak English as an additional language. The school has Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) provision. The proportion of pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities is low. The school has a Children’s Centre on site, operated by a private provider; this has been inspected separately.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 9 Inspection Report: Newham Bridge Primary School, 16 October 2008

p.3

Grade: 2

This is a good school with outstanding features. Parents rightly praise its wonderful ethos. ‘It does everything in its power to assist parents and children,’ was a typical remark. It takes excellent care of its pupils; staff know pupils’ individual needs and respond readily to any concern. All safeguarding procedures are firmly in place. Support and encouragement are intrinsic to the school’s everyday life, and so pupils grow in self-esteem and become responsible young people. Indeed, their personal development is outstanding. Behaviour is excellent and attendance, an issue at the last inspection, has been very swiftly improved and is now satisfactory. The accommodation is improving year-on-year; particularly impressive is the new EYFS extension. All this is possible because of the excellent leadership of the headteacher, ably supported by a dedicated staff. Pupils’ academic achievement is good. They enter Year 1 with skills and abilities that are broadly

p.4

Grade: 2

average, although slightly below, especially in language. By the end of Year 2, standards are consistently average. By the end of Year 6, standards are above average, occasionally higher in science. The school is well aware of comparative weaknesses in writing and mathematics, and has worked to overcome them. They have been effective with writing but their plans for mathematics have been less successful. The school has done well to raise the percentage of pupils who gain the expected Level 4, but too few pupils reach the higher Level 5. This is because although teachers do vary work for different groups of pupils, it tends to be quite similar. Less able pupils and those with learning difficulties and/or disabilities are able to cope with this work and achieve well, helped by effective support from staff in lessons. More able pupils do not achieve so well, because they do not have enough scope to work at their own

p.4

Grade: 2

pace. Science, with more independent work available, is one subject in which more able pupils prosper. Pupils from minorithy ethnic backgrounds have not been achieving as well as other pupils because some of their attendance was patchy. The Parent Support Worker, helped by outside agencies, has worked very successfully with families to transform this situation. There is an excellent ambience in every classroom. Teachers are very organised and establish firm ground rules, so that pupils respond very well and sustain concentration. Importantly, pupils respect their teachers and teaching assistants. Lessons have very clear aims, resources are plentiful and little time is lost. A very efficient assessment process, led by the deputy headteacher, gives teachers vital information about pupils’ progress. The curriculum is well structured and is beginning to be more creative and stimulating. There is still some way to go; English and mathematics are not strengthened enough by practical

p.4

Grade: 2

applications. Special days enliven learning, such as the Year 5 Greek Day. Through similar activities, visits and visitors, the school provides excellent enrichment that broadens pupils’ knowledge. Older pupils talked excitedly about their forthcoming visit to Beamish. Other strengths include the outstanding provision for pupils’ social and health development, even though pupils have yet to take full ownership of a healthy lifestyle. Provision for pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities is good. The leadership and management of the school are good. The headteacher is a decisive and influential leader; the gleaming, spacious accommodation is testament to her resolve and hard work. She champions care and support, not just for pupils, but also staff and families, and she ensures that all staff share her philosophy. The senior leadership team work closely together and contribute significant skills. Their evaluation of the school’s strengths and weaknesses is

p.4

Grade: 2

4 of 9 Inspection Report: Newham Bridge Primary School, 16 October 2008 good, and most actions lead to successful improvement. However, its priorities are not sufficiently analysed nor identified in fine detail. Governors are supportive and hard working, but do not monitor the work of the school with any regularity. Nevertheless, the school is thriving and shows good scope to improve further.

p.4

Grade: 2

Children benefit from a good start in the EYFS. They enter the Nursery with attainment below that typical of three-year-olds; their social and communication skills are somewhat lower. Good teaching enables them to achieve well and they mostly reach the levels expected for their age at the end of the Reception year. They make excellent progress in their personal and social development because of the very encouraging and supportive atmosphere, as well as the excellent quality of care. Language lags behind other areas of learning to some extent. The new building enables children to access a wide range of activities although, at present, they are not allowed to move freely between indoor and outdoor activities. As this is a requirement of the new EYFS framework, the school will gradually introduce it. Particularly impressive is the independence that children acquire. Whilst they seek and benefit from adult advice, they rapidly learn to explore for themselves. During the inspection, for

p.5

Grade: 2

example, one three-year-old was earnestly investigating what the interactive whiteboard could do; others were asking sensible medical questions as doctors in their role-play corner. Assessment of children’s work is constant and detailed, and feeds daily into an overview of their progress, so that they can be more challenged in their learning. The EYFS is well led by an experienced practitioner, who promotes good links with parents to support children’s welfare and learning.

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

■ Analyse areas of concern more thoroughly so that subsequent action plans are sharply defined and, as a result, can be more successfully monitored. ■ Ensure that all work is more closely matched to the needs of all pupils, especially more able pupils. 5 of 9 Inspection Report: Newham Bridge Primary School, 16 October 2008 .

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 of 9 Inspection Report: Newham Bridge Primary School, 16 October 2008

p.6

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.7

needs of learners?

Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well being? 2 The capacity to make any necessary improvements

p.7

EYFS?

2 How well do children in the EYFS achieve? How good are the overall personal development and well-being of the children in the EYFS? 2 How effectively are children in the EYFS helped to learn and develop? 1 How effectively is the welfare of children in the EYFS promoted? 2 How effectively is provision in the EYFS led and managed?

p.7

Achievement and standards

2 How well do learners achieve? 2 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and/or disabilities make progress

p.7

Achievement and standards

1 Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 of 9 Inspection Report: Newham Bridge Primary School, 16 October 2008

p.7

learners?

1 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 1 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 1 The extent to which learners enjoy their education 3 The attendance of learners 1 The behaviour of learners 1 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.8

learners' needs?

How well do the curriculum and other activities meet the range of needs and interests of learners? 1 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.8

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 2 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation 3 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination eliminated 2 How well does the school contribute to community cohesion? How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 8 of 9 Inspection Report: Newham Bridge Primary School, 16 October 2008

p.8

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

17 October 2008 Dear Pupils Inspection of Newham Bridge Primary School, Middlesbrough, TS5 9NJ I am writing to thank you for the part you played in the recent inspection of your school. I very much enjoyed my visit and I learned a great deal from you that helped me to gain a clearer picture of your school. Your views were important. It may come as no surprise to you that I think you go to a good school. It has some excellent features, especially the care, support and encouragement that all staff provide for you, and also the way you develop. You come on leaps and bounds in your time at the school. Your behaviour is excellent, you have great attitudes to your work, you take on responsibilities sensibly and you look after one another so well. Your attendance has improved impressively. You are increasingly leading a healthy lifestyle, although opting for a wholesome diet is hard work. I know! You achieve well in your work because of good teaching. Standards by Year 6 are usually above

p.9

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

average. You do particularly well in science and your writing is better than it was. However, standards in mathematics have not improved as much as in other subjects. Some of you are not being challenged enough to help you achieve the higher levels in your tests. I have asked the school to make sure that you are all challenged so more of you reach the higher levels. In addition, I have asked the school to find out why your maths is not as good as other subjects and to check on the progress of action plans. The school is generally improving well, thanks to the excellent leadership of your headteacher and the sterling work of all staff. The building is bright and smart. As you told me, you want for nothing. If you do want something new, the school listens and acts, as seen in the arrival of the new bike sheds, for example. The signs for continued development are promising and I wish you every success.

p.9

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Yours sincerely Andrew Scott Lead inspector 9 of 9 Inspection Report: Newham Bridge Primary School, 16 October 2008

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion