Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Spring Meadow Infant School

Inspected 23 Oct 2008 · published 11 Dec 2008 · URN 110760

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    23 Oct 2008

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jill Bavin

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    Spring Meadow Infant School

  • URN verified

    110760

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2005.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+67Positivemore positive than 17% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandinggood progressenjoyeffectivelyexceptionallyimprovedsuccessfullyexemplary
Criticismnot alwaysinadequatebelowweaknessconcernsinconsistentlackworrying

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings2439w+67
  • What needs to improve192w+49

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,503
about usual (typical 2775)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 47
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
3
typical 8
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 92%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Spring Meadow Infant School Inspection report

p.1

110760 Unique Reference Number Cambridgeshire Local Authority 325213 Inspection number 23 October 2008 Inspection date Jill Bavin Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. The registered childcare, managed by the governing body, was inspected under section 49 of the Childcare Act 2006.

p.1

Infant Type of school Community School category 3–7 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 332 School (total) 0 Government funded early education provision for children aged 3 to the end of the EYFS 24 Childcare provision for children aged 0 to 3 years The governing body Appropriate authority Mr David Farrow Chair Mrs Sheila Sands Headteacher 9 November 2005 Date of previous school inspection Not previously inspected Date of previous funded early education inspection Not previously inspected Date of previous childcare inspection High Barns School address Ely Cambridgeshire CB7 4RB 01353 664742 Telephone number 01353 666575 Fax number

p.1

3–7 Age group 23 October 2008 Inspection date 325213 Inspection number .

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. 2 of 10 Inspection Report: Spring Meadow Infant School, 23 October 2008

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by two Additional Inspectors. Inspectors evaluated the overall effectiveness of the school and investigated the following issues.

p.3

Introduction

■ What is the school doing to further raise standards in science and increase boys' attainment?

p.3

Introduction

■ What has been the impact of recent curriculum initiatives?

p.3

Introduction

■ Are there elements of outstanding provision for the most vulnerable children?

p.3

Introduction

Evidence was gathered from observing lessons, lunchtime and breaks; talking with children, staff and governors; checking the school's record of lesson observations as well as assessment and children's progress records; and analysing the results of questionnaires returned by parents. Other aspects of the school's work were not investigated in detail, but inspectors found no evidence to suggest that the school's own assessments, as given in its self-evaluation, were not justified, and these have been included where appropriate in this report.

p.3

Description of the school

This is a larger than average infant school with a 104 place nursery and a 10 place Infant Assessment Unit on site. Children in this assessment unit learn in separate small groups and alongside their peers in the main school. The governors provide a breakfast club and a nursery lunch club. Some children from the school attend an after school club on the local housing estate, which governors do not manage. Most children join the nursery below expectations for their age in key skills. Most children are from white British backgrounds although the school population is changing. The percentage of children who are learning English as an additional language is increasing although it is below national averages. The proportion of children with learning difficulties and/or disabilities varies considerably from year to year but is usually below the national average. The school has achieved Healthy Schools Status.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 10 Inspection Report: Spring Meadow Infant School, 23 October 2008

p.3

Grade: 2

This is a good school experiencing success in raising standards and achievement for its children. Standards in reading, writing and mathematics are above average and the percentage of higher attaining children increases as they move through the school. Many parents commend staff highly for their willingness to support them and their children. Comments that reflect the views of many include describing the school as going 'the extra mile for the children'. Another parent values support 'through some very difficult times' and a parent of a child supported by the Assessment Unit writes, 'I couldn't ask for more.' Although a handful of parents are concerned that the school does not take sufficient account of their or their children's views, many more say how approachable and friendly staff are. The school reaches out to families who are new to Britain and whose children arrive with very little or no spoken English. This helps these children to settle quickly and become ready to

p.4

Grade: 2

learn. It has successfully forged very close links with representatives of other professions outside the school in order to ensure it meets the needs of children who find learning difficult. Because of the school's exemplary work with individual children in particularly difficult circumstances, these children make outstanding progress in their social skills as well as good progress academically. Children have a good understanding of right and wrong and report little worrying behaviour from their peers. They are confident that adults in school will help them with any concerns. Children enjoy school because they like and trust their teachers and teaching assistants. Activities are well chosen to reflect children's age and stage of development. They reflect teachers' good level of expectation and challenge which they carefully adjust to meet differing needs within the class, and so they hold children's interest well. The most articulate children recall work they

p.4

Grade: 2

have enjoyed and talk about it confidently with visitors after the event. This is evident, for example, when children discuss their artwork in the style of Van Gogh. They use sophisticated terminology and the work demonstrates a good range of practical techniques. Nevertheless, children report occasions when their teachers 'talk too long'. While there is a successful focus on teaching key skills there are missed opportunities for children to learn actively and independently. Children's personal and social development is good overall, rather than outstanding, because opportunities for them to take responsibility for their learning are inconsistent. A wide and varied programme of visits and special events enrich the curriculum. It makes a good contribution to children's cultural development while ensuring the school maintains close links with the local community, through participation in various local history and arts festivals.

p.4

Grade: 2

Events and activities such as these successfully add interest for children and contribute to the good progress they make. For example, a visit to a butterfly park successfully inspired a good quality of extended writing. Strengths in relationships also contribute to children's positive attitudes and good behaviour in lessons and around the school. Children receive constructive and encouraging feedback about their work, both verbally and through marking on their books. This is an area of significant development since the previous inspection. As a result, children have a good understanding of what they have done well and how to improve their work. Children who find learning quite difficult share their improved writing with considerable and justifiable pride. 4 of 10 Inspection Report: Spring Meadow Infant School, 23 October 2008 Systems for checking how well each child is doing are relatively new and are beginning to

p.4

Grade: 2

generate useful information. The school has begun to analyse this information and has made a good start in using this analysis. For example, it has identified that fewer children reach the higher level 3 in science than in reading, writing and mathematics. It has taken a strategic whole school approach to improving the extent to which teachers adapt practical science work to meet differing needs. This is too recent to have had a full impact on standards. The school recognises that it needs to encourage boys to voice their ideas more, in order to improve their writing. New ways of approaching topic work have been carefully researched and trialled. Teachers are pleased with initial responses, from their observation of boys' enthusiasm and discussion generated by designing a 'theme park'. Firm plans are in place for this kind of approach to be used more routinely after half term. However, evaluations of what has worked

p.5

Grade: 2

well do not always focus clearly on measurable outcomes in terms of children's skills. For example, children clearly enjoyed the recent information and communication technology, history and cultural 'Fens Project' but its impact on gains in specific skills is less clear. Effective school leadership and management support good teaching and learning and contribute to the school's continuing development. This is a school where staff pull together to improve outcomes for children. Subject leaders make a good contribution to this process. This shared drive for improvement accounts for improved standards and achievement in tested subjects over the last three years. Children in Year 2 are on track for this rise in standards to continue in 2009. Boys' reading has improved significantly since the introduction of a specific approach to teaching reading two and a half years ago. The school's lack of complacency and its response

p.5

Grade: 2

to addressing areas of relative weakness and improvements since the previous inspection place it in a good position to carry on improving.

p.5

Grade: 2

Children in the nursery and reception classes make good progress from their starting points in all areas of learning. By the time they join Year 1 they have the level of skill, knowledge and understanding that is expected for their age. They make particularly good progress socially and in their readiness to learn, because of the emphasis staff place on this. Adults set a good example of how to behave and communicate. Staff make home visits before children join the Nursery and introduce children to school sensitively. Parents are pleased with how quickly their children settle. Day to day care for children's well-being and safety is good. Children in the breakfast and nursery lunchtime clubs enjoy suitable activities while they wait for school to start or for lunch. Children and adults in the clubs, Nursery and Reception classes enjoy good relationships: encouraging children to conform to working and playing alongside each other

p.5

Grade: 2

harmoniously is a positive process. Adults place an appropriately high emphasis upon developing the key skills that will support children's future learning. Activities are chosen to engage children's interest and extend their horizons. For example, during the inspection, girls and boys enjoyed learning about Diwali, creating Rangoli patterns and dressing up for Indian dances. Staff take account of children's individual interests to an extent. However, there is more to be done here, especially in the Reception classes. Similarly, while children have reasonable chances to select activities and make choices, adult support does not always allow children to learn through their own experience. The school has improved access to an outdoor learning environment for children in the Reception classes since the previous inspection. The outdoor space is used more widely 5 of 10 Inspection Report: Spring Meadow Infant School, 23 October 2008

p.5

Grade: 2

to cover a greater variety of learning activities and the school is currently exploring ways to develop this further.

p.6

What the school should do to improve further

■ Extend the use of the school's assessment information to evaluate more rigorously the impact of school initiatives. ■ Provide more opportunities for children to take responsibility for their learning, including children in the Early Years Foundation Stage. 6 of 10 Inspection Report: Spring Meadow Infant School, 23 October 2008 .

p.6

What the school should do to improve further

in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 7 of 10 Inspection Report: Spring Meadow Infant School, 23 October 2008

p.7

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.8

needs of learners?

Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well being? 2 The capacity to make any necessary improvements

p.8

EYFS?

2 How well do children in the EYFS achieve? How good are the overall personal development and well-being of the children in the EYFS? 2 How effectively are children in the EYFS helped to learn and develop? 2 How effectively is the welfare of children in the EYFS promoted? 2 How effectively is provision in the EYFS led and managed?

p.8

Achievement and standards

2 How well do learners achieve? 2 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and/or disabilities make progress

p.8

Achievement and standards

1 Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 8 of 10 Inspection Report: Spring Meadow Infant School, 23 October 2008

p.8

learners?

2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 The extent to which learners enjoy their education 2 The attendance of learners 2 The behaviour of learners 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

learners' needs?

How well do the curriculum and other activities meet the range of needs and interests of learners? 2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 2 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation 1 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination eliminated 2 How well does the school contribute to community cohesion? How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 9 of 10 Inspection Report: Spring Meadow Infant School, 23 October 2008

p.9

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

24 October 2008 Dear Children Inspection of Spring Meadow Infant School, Ely, CB7 4RB Thank you for making us so welcome when we visited your school recently. We enjoyed meeting and talking with you about your work in some of the lessons. A special thank you goes to the members of the school council who met us in the library and shared their ideas about the school. We agree with you and your parents that you go to a good school. You told us that you enjoy school because people are friendly and we could see that you work hard. You particularly enjoy the way you learn to read (ERR) and we could see this in the way you concentrate so well in these sessions. Because your teachers plan how to help you so carefully, you make good progress in reading, writing, mathematics and science. Teachers and teaching assistants are extremely good at helping children who find working in a group difficult. This means that these children make extremely good progress in learning how to manage their

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

behaviour and make friends. This is one of the reasons why you tell us that there is not very much worrying behaviour around school and if there is you know you can go to an adult for help. You feel safe because you know your teachers and headteacher care about you. The governors, headteacher and senior staff agree with us that in order to make your good school even better, they will find even more ways of working out what helps you most, especially when you have new projects. Sometimes your teachers help you almost too much. We have asked them to give everyone more chances to work things out for themselves, even the youngest of you. You can help by being willing to work on your own or in small groups more often, in the way children in Year 2 did when they were designing a theme park. Thank you again for being so friendly and helpful. Jill Bavin Lead inspector 10 of 10 Inspection Report: Spring Meadow Infant School, 23 October 2008

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion