Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 25 Apr 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Valerie Pearson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Valerie Pearson

  • Postcode verified

    TA19 0DS

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+87Very positivemore positive than 96% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisestrongexcellenteffectivehigh qualityskilfullyenjoyconfidentsecure

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings318w+87
  • What needs to improve91w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
400
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 36, typical 48
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
5
typical 2
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 78%What needs to improve 22%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr J Jeffery Headteacher Greenfylde Church of England First School Silver Street Ilminster Somerset TA19 0DS

p.1

Education (RE)

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 17 March 2008 to look at work in RE.

p.1

Education (RE)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Education (RE)

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: discussions with you, the subject leader for RE, a class teacher, a governor and Year 1 pupils; and scrutiny of documentation and pupils’ work.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 A strong commitment shown by you and your staff and governors to securing high quality RE for all pupils.  A good subject leader who is developing the subject systematically and supporting staff skilfully in extending pupils’ experiences and learning in RE.  The effective use of a wide range of appropriate activities and resources, including artefacts and information and communication technology, which capture pupils’ interest and secure for them very good experiences for learning, particularly about Christianity.  Discussion with pupils indicates that they enjoy learning in RE, are confident about expressing and sharing their ideas and experiences and about using subject specific language relating to their work on Christianity.  The planning for strong links between RE and literacy to help promote effective learning in RE.  Excellent links with the local church enrich pupils’ learning. Pupils’ understanding of Christianity is strengthened by their experiences of

p.1

Features of good practice observed

visiting the church and talking with members of the Christian community.  A reflective culture which secures good evaluation of the school’s provision for RE, correctly identifies areas for development and leads to appropriate action to ensure continuous improvement.

p.2

Areas for development

 Embedding relatively new assessment processes for RE across the school.  Implementing the plans to extend the good practice used to help pupils learn about Christianity, to enrich their learning about other world faiths.

p.2

Areas for development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop RE in the school.

p.2

Areas for development

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and SACRE, the local diocese and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion