Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 963
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 31, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Context
At the inspection in June 2005, the provider’s leadership and management and quality improvement were both judged to be inadequate. Equality of opportunity was judged to be satisfactory while Entry to Employment (E2E) provision was found to be inadequate. Reinspection took place over three visits. One inspector attended for a day in January 2006 and a further day in May 2006. Two inspectors then attended for three days in July 2006. The first two visits concentrated on evaluating the effectiveness of E.Quality’s post-inspection action plan in rectifying the weaknesses and consolidating the strengths found at the previous inspection. The final visit reinspected all aspects of E.Quality’s leadership and management and the E2E training programme. At reinspection all aspects of the provision were judged to be satisfactory.
p.1
progress
E.Quality has made significant progress in maintaining the strongly improving trends in rates of retention, achievement and progression noted at the previous inspection. In 2005/06, 89% of learners who started the programme were retained. This rose to 94% in 2006/07 and is at a similarly high level for the current year. E.Quality has identified the reasons why learners leave early. These are almost exclusively due to personal issues. For example, a significant proportion of learners do not complete their programme due to pregnancy. Staff now monitor data more effectively to identify learners who are making slow progress. Achievement rates have improved dramatically. In 2004/05, no learners achieved their programme aims. Following the previous inspection in 2005/06 the proportion of learners achieving a Level 1 qualification more than doubled to 68% in 2006/07. In the current year, the proportion is high at 82%. The rate of learners progressing into employment, further
p.1
progress
education or accredited training shows a consistently improving trend. In 2006/07, approximately half of all learners progressed onto one of these outcomes. Data for the current year shows a continuation of this improving trend. However, recruitment of learners has steadily declined over the last four years.
p.1
progress
The provider has made reasonable progress in improving the weak target-setting experienced by learners at the previous inspection. Staff have undertaken relevant training to improve their skills in writing targets that are specific and measurable. In addition, staff have evaluated each others' recorded target-setting as part of a self- and peer assessment process. A member of staff has attended training specifically applicable to E2E programmes and used the experience to facilitate the improvement of practice across the organisation. All learners have a review of their progress every four weeks. Tutors effectively link targets set in reviews and planned individual learning activities to learners’ personal objectives. Most targets now include details of the benefits that agreed actions will bring to learners. In a small number of cases, the quality of a tutor's handwriting used to record targets is difficult to read.
p.2
progress
E.Quality has made reasonable progress in maintaining and improving learners’ access to an appropriate range of learning options. Since the previous inspection, E.Quality has introduced training in hairdressing at Level 1 and childcare at Level 2. E.Quality also provides an accredited employment skills qualification for learners that helps them clarify potential career options and develop their job-seeking skills. An appropriate range of vocational area taster days are available that are well matched to individual learners’ abilities and future goals. Effective use is made of links with local employers to provide work-placements.
p.2
progress
The provider has made reasonable progress to improve the evaluation of quality improvement activities. E.Quality has regular monthly meetings that all staff attend which are now more structured, have set agendas and provide a clear quality improvement focus for all programmes and the opportunity to share good practice. At these meetings staff regularly discuss learner progression. Internal communication through regular informal discussions between staff is good. The provider has identified and recorded a set of comprehensive quality improvement actions. All actions have identified targets, dates for completion and responsibilities for identified actions. The provider effectively monitors and evaluates progress in achieving quality improvement targets. E.Quality appropriately uses the quality improvement action plan to produce its annual self-assessment report.
p.2
progress
E.Quality has made significant progress in improving access facilities for learners with restricted mobility at the Newcastle centre which was previously problematic. A private car park provides easy access to the building and entry is via a set of double doors and a removable access ramp. The provider has widened several internal doors to provide access to a classroom on the ground floor. E.Quality has recently constructed toilets that are accessible to individuals with mobility difficulties and are awaiting building approval. Learners with restricted mobility also have some access to computers and the Internet on the ground floor. Computers facilities also include the availability of laptops and wireless connectivity throughout the building. Staff identify learners with restricted mobility at other E.Quality buildings and refer them to the Newcastle training centre.
p.3
progress
Reasonable progress has been made to ensure the self-assessment process and development plan drives forward improvements. All staff have a further opportunity to input to the self-assessment report at an annual self-assessment development day. Learners are encouraged to provide feedback at various stages throughout their programmes through a well designed questionnaire. There are regular opportunities for learners to provide informal feedback during their progress reviews. E.Quality has recently employed the services of an external questionnaire data processing organisation that has provided useful independent feedback from learners and other stakeholders. E.Quality produces annual development plans that identify wider organisation targets as well as learner attainment and progression targets. The provider uses development plans to identify strategic changes, such as the widening of the curriculum, and the need to make changes to the accommodation to ensure
p.3
progress
provided that the information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk).
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion