Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 8 Sept 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jill Bavin

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jill Bavin

  • Postcode verified

    PE30 4RR

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+50Positivemore positive than 50% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedeffectiveconsistentlyeffectivelymake good progressgood progresssupportiverigorous
Criticismbelowgapsnot alwaysnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings932w+39
  • Leadership355w+60
  • What needs to improve56w+39

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,335
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 69%Leadership 26%What needs to improve 4%

Full report text

Mrs S. O’Connor Acting Headteacher Fairstead Community Primary School William Booth Road King’s Lynn Norfolk PE30 4RR.

p.1

COMMUNITY PRIMARY SCHOOL

Following my visit with Alan Lemon and Jill Bavin, Additional Inspectors, to your school on 8 and 9 July 2008, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector to confirm the inspection findings.

p.1

COMMUNITY PRIMARY SCHOOL

The visit was the fourth monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures in January 2007. The monitoring inspection report is attached and the main judgements are set out below.

p.1

COMMUNITY PRIMARY SCHOOL

Progress since being subject to special measures – satisfactory.

p.1

COMMUNITY PRIMARY SCHOOL

Progress since previous monitoring inspection – satisfactory.

p.1

COMMUNITY PRIMARY SCHOOL

Newly qualified teachers may not be appointed without reference to HMI.

p.1

COMMUNITY PRIMARY SCHOOL

This letter and monitoring inspection report will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.1

COMMUNITY PRIMARY SCHOOL

I am copying this letter and the monitoring inspection report to the Secretary of State, the chair of the interim executive board and the Director of Children’s Services for Norfolk.

p.1

COMMUNITY PRIMARY SCHOOL

John Mitcheson H M Inspector. Cambridge Education Demeter House Station Road Cambridge CB1 2RS T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01223 578500 Direct F 01223 578501 risp.inspections@camb-ed.com

p.1

SPECIAL MEASURES: MONITORING OF FAIRSTEAD PRIMARY SCHOOL

Report from the fourth monitoring inspection: 8 and 9 July 2008.

p.2

Evidence

Inspectors observed the school’s work, scrutinised documents and met with the acting headteacher, the senior leadership team, literacy, numeracy and science coordinators, the chair of the interim executive board, a group of pupils and 2 representatives from the local authority.

p.2

Context

Since the previous visit a new senior manager has taken up her post as leader of the Foundation Stage and Key Stage 1. The school has reduced the number of teacher assistants. The interim executive board are at an advanced stage of considering future governance arrangements for the school.

p.2

Achievement and standards

The school has built on the improvements noted during the previous inspection and can now present growing evidence that the majority of pupils are making satisfactory progress. In the Foundation Stage, pupils continue to make good progress in all the areas of learning and the majority are prepared well for Key Stage 1. Teacher assessments made at end of Year 2 this year show that standards remain well below average, but have risen in reading, writing and mathematics as a result of improved teaching and monitoring of progress. In Key Stage 2, the school’s own provisional data indicates that standards are well below average. However, pupils’ progress is now systematically monitored and most pupils have made satisfactory progress and met the targets set for them in English and mathematics. Lesson observations by inspectors confirmed that pupils make satisfactory progress and, in an increasing proportion of lessons, good progress. Pupils continue to make more progress in

p.2

Achievement and standards

Years 5 and 6 than in Years 3 and 4. The Headteacher has taken decisive action to resolve this by deploying some of her most effective teachers into these classes. Teachers’ greater confidence in using assessment data to monitor progress and identify gaps in pupils’ learning is leading to improvements. These procedures have not been in place long enough to gauge pupils’ progress throughout their time in school and have not yet been extended into science.

p.2

Achievement and standards

Progress on the areas for improvement identified by the inspection in January 2007:

p.2

Achievement and standards

 Increase the amount of progress that pupils make and raise the standards they attain in reading, writing, mathematics and science – satisfactory.

p.2

Personal development and well-being

Pupils' good behaviour has been maintained. Pupils' play is active and healthily boisterous in the playground but overall, the school is an orderly community. Pupils are friendly with and supportive of each other. Pupils told inspectors that there is no bullying anymore, ‘just splurges of silliness’. Pupils are enjoying school more because work is more often matched to their needs and there are, according to one boy, ’thousands more rewards’. Attendance rates have improved and punctuality is improving as a result of more rigorous monitoring by senior managers. Although still below the national average pupils' attendance compares well with schools in similar circumstances.

p.2

Quality of provision

Senior managers have successfully ensured that the quality of teaching and learning has continued to improve. Inspectors found that in more than half of the lessons observed, good teaching accelerates pupils' progress and allows them to catch up on previous gaps in their learning. Teachers consistently explain the context of the lesson so pupils know what to do. Planning routinely takes account of pupils' prior learning, so work is better matched to the needs of different groups. Teachers and other adults manage pupils' behaviour well, so interruptions to learning are much reduced. Teaching assistants are better briefed and support pupils effectively, especially those pupils who find learning difficult. However, lesson plans do not always specify what their role is or the tasks they are expected to do, which limits their effectiveness in some lessons. An increasing number of teachers involve pupils

p.3

Quality of provision

in assessing their own learning and encourage them to gauge how well they are doing against the targets set for them. They ask pupils to evaluate the common features of successful work and during questioning, encourage them to share ideas before answering. This is helping to build pupils’ confidence and promote their independence. The standard of presentation of pupils’ work is not high enough because not all teachers make it clear what the expectations are or reinforce good habits. Teachers are making good use of interactive white boards to stimulate pupil interest but there are not enough opportunities for pupils to use computers.

p.3

Quality of provision

Progress on the areas for improvement identified by the inspection in January 2007:

p.3

Quality of provision

 Take immediate action to ensure that the quality of teaching and learning is at least satisfactory throughout the school – good.

p.3

Leadership and management

The acting headteacher continues to drive school improvement and provides the school with a clear educational direction. She ensures that everyone else in the school is committed to resolving the issues raised in the previous inspection and staff morale remains buoyant. The senior leadership team has been strengthened significantly and is now much better placed to fully address the priorities facing the school. They work effectively and enthusiastically as a team and share a corporate determination to improve the quality of education provided. All senior managers have undertaken structured lesson observations to help others improve their teaching and help to identify what constitutes an effective lesson. Assessment procedures are now firmly established in literacy and numeracy but not in science. A newly appointed coordinator has implemented a plan of action to improve the quality of teaching and learning and raise overall achievement in science. Senior managers have begun to

p.3

Leadership and management

seek the views of parents in order to engage them in the life of the school. Progress on the areas for improvement identified by the inspection in January 2007:

p.3

Leadership and management

 Develop the effectiveness of leadership and management at all levels so that measures to improve the quality of education are implemented systematically and as a matter of urgency – satisfactory.

p.4

External support

The school is benefiting from a range of curriculum support coordinated by the local authority. Senior advisers meet regularly with the headteacher to provide the support she needs and has revised its plans in order to remove the school from special measures by the end of this year. Minutes of these meetings are not shared with inspectors. They have helped the school to make accurate assessments of pupil progress in Key Stage 1 but have had less involvement in validating the school’s own view of the quality of teaching and learning. An interim executive board continues to oversee the school’s strategic development and coordinate improvements to the site. The headteacher provides the board with regular progress reports but these are not thoroughly evaluated to gauge whether or not all aspects of the key issues raised in the previous inspection are being progressed at a suitable rate.

p.4

Priorities for further improvement

 Embed and extend assessment procedures to ensure that teachers have a thorough understanding of how well pupils are achieving in science

p.4

Priorities for further improvement

 Continue to monitor the effectiveness of lessons so that teachers’ expectations remain consistently high and good practice is extended across all classes

p.4

Priorities for further improvement

 Ensure that pupils make greater use of computers in lessons.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion