Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 25 Feb 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Ian Richardson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ian Richardson

  • Postcode verified

    HG4 2DG

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 20% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings33w0
  • What needs to improve98w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
129
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 48
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 7%What needs to improve 20%About the inspection 73%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk 31 January 2008

p.1

Mr M Pearman Headteacher Ripon Grammar School Clotherholme Road Ripon North Yorkshire HG4 2DG

p.1

Ofsted subject survey: good practice in science

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on to look at work in science on Wednesday 30 January 2008.

p.1

Ofsted subject survey: good practice in science

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted subject survey: good practice in science

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: discussions with you, discussions with senior staff and heads of department, observation of two lessons, scrutiny of documents and scrutiny of pupils’ work.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 Pupils are making excellent progress during Key Stage 3 such that pupils’ achievement in national tests is in the top 5% of schools.  The leadership and management in science are outstanding, and the team of science teachers work well collaboratively to provide pupils with good quality science education.  Pupils in interview make it clear that they very much appreciate the enthusiasm and hard work of their teachers who they believe are nothing less than good and often outstanding.  The support that teachers give extends well beyond the classroom. Pupils describe how they can always approach their teachers for help and how they always get a positive response.  Teachers are well qualified specialists who teach their subjects with enthusiasm and skill.  The refurbishing of laboratories and the installation of interactive whiteboards have created a very positive environment for learning science  There is a systematic approach to assessment across Key Stage 3 that

p.1

Features of good practice observed

involves all staff using detailed criteria and also setting clear targets to guide improvement.  The rigorous assessment system and high staff expectation combine to promote learning. Pupils know how well they are doing and recognise the vigilance of staff that ensures they complete the work set.  The good emphasis given to scientific enquiry is promoting pupils’ engagement and interest. Pupils describe such work as one of the features of science that they enjoy most.  Information and communication technology is being used more and is helping pupils to learn well, especially when it is used interactively.

p.1

Areas for development, which we discussed, included:

 raising standards in GCSE physics and biology to align with the high attainment in chemistry  bringing consistency to marking pupils work across the science subjects, such that pupils receive feedback of the same quality in the same way using a common grading and mark system.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop science in the school.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, included:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion