Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 18 Apr 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Colin Smith

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Colin Smith

  • Postcode verified

    LS21 2DF

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−6Mixedmore positive than 14% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivesuccessfullyrigorousenjoysuccessfulclearengagingeffectively
Criticisminadequateshortcomingsweakweaknessesinsufficientlynot alwaysweakererrors

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings569w−2
  • Leadership113w−20
  • What needs to improve113w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
770
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 37, typical 48
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 60%Leadership 12%What needs to improve 12%About the inspection 16%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs S Parker Headteacher Ashfield Primary School Weston Lane Otley West Yorkshire LS21 2DF

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 29 February 2008 to look at work in mathematics.

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

As outlined in our initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on the effectiveness of the school’s approaches to improving the quality of teaching and learning in mathematics.

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of two lessons.

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The overall effectiveness of the subject, mathematics, was judged to be satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Achievement in mathematics is satisfactory and standards are average.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 According to the school’s records, many children enter the Nursery class with knowledge and skills below those expected for their age. By the end of the Reception year, most children are working securely within the learning goals expected for their age, which indicates good mathematical development.  Pupils’ achievement is satisfactory in Key Stage 1 and standards are broadly average by the end of Year 2.  The school is working successfully to overcome a legacy of underachievement in Key Stage 2. Inadequate teaching and inaccurate assessments, in the past, have contributed to a slower rate of progress for many pupils. The school’s rigorous tracking records show that most pupils are now making satisfactory progress, and standards are rising. In Year 6, standards are average and higher than they were in the national tests of 2007.  Pupils’ achievement in handling data is good. Their calculation skills are secure

p.1

Achievement and standards

but they experience difficulty in using and applying their skills when trying to solve mathematical problems.  Pupils enjoy mathematics, particularly when using information and communications technology (ICT) to enhance their learning. They have good attitudes to learning and work well independently and in groups.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of mathematics

The quality of teaching and learning of mathematics is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of mathematics

 Teachers are largely successful in developing pupils’ mathematical vocabulary.  The aims of the lesson are made very clear and pupils are helped to assess their own learning, using checklists of the steps they need to take.  Teachers make effective use of ICT and mathematical apparatus to help pupils to visualise mathematical ideas.  Teachers use a good variety of approaches, such as mathematical games and paired discussions, to make learning interesting and engaging.  Accurate assessments made of pupils’ learning over a period of time are instrumental in providing good quality additional support. However, teachers’ use of assessment within lessons is insufficiently developed. Pupils’ misconceptions are not always identified and remedied. This leads to misunderstanding and errors in their written work.

p.2

Quality of the mathematics curriculum

The quality of the mathematics curriculum is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of the mathematics curriculum

 The revised national strategy is being implemented effectively. The curriculum is being reviewed and evaluated as each unit is taught.  ICT is often used well to support and extend learning in mathematics.  Some effective links are being developed with other subjects to ensure that pupils use their mathematical skills in a range of contexts, for example in interpreting data collected in science investigations.  The school has identified ‘using and applying mathematics’ as a weaker area. Activities are being introduced to strengthen these shortcomings.

p.2

Leadership and management of mathematics

The leadership and management of mathematics are satisfactory.

p.2

Leadership and management of mathematics

 You are raising the expectations of staff and pupils. A tracking system designed to measure individual pupils’ progress is beginning to draw attention to where teaching needs to be stronger and pupils require additional support.  The subject leader has devised a clear plan of action to improve provision and raise achievement. Her thorough analysis of assessment results in every year group is helping to focus attention on key areas where pupils’ knowledge and skills are weak.  Processes for checking and improving the quality of teaching and learning are not focussed sufficiently on identifying the extent to which teaching increases pupils’ conceptual understanding.

p.2

the quality of teaching and learning in mathematics

 National and local initiatives are drawing attention to important aspects of teaching and learning, such as pupils’ self-assessment, the use of ICT and development of pupils’ mathematical vocabulary. Training sessions have led to improvement in these areas.  The school is beginning to consider where strengths and weaknesses lie in the teaching of mathematics. As yet, sharing expertise is at an early stage.

p.3

Inclusion

 Pupils’ different learning needs are well catered for in lessons.  Pupils who experience learning difficulties benefit from good levels of additional support.  Tracking progress is effective in monitoring the performance of different groups of pupils, such boys and girls.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 using assessment within lessons more purposefully to ensure that all pupils understand and their misconceptions are remedied  increasing the rigour in monitoring and evaluating teaching and learning to raise pupils’ achievement, particularly in using and applying mathematics  identifying where teachers’ subject knowledge and skills are greatest and use this information to share and promote good practice.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop mathematics in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As explained in our previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion