Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 31 Mar 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Colin Smith

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Colin Smith

  • Postcode verified

    OL13 8PH

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+16Mostly positivemore positive than 58% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisemake good progressclearimprovedrigorousimprovingeffectivesensitively
Criticismnot alwaysinconsistenciesnot stronglimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings534w−1
  • Leadership98w+50
  • What needs to improve111w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
721
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 59%Leadership 11%What needs to improve 12%About the inspection 17%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs F Simpson Headteacher Northern Primary School Burnley Road Bacup Lancashire OL13 8PH

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 5 February 2008 to look at work in mathematics.

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

As outlined in our initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on the effectiveness of the school’s approaches to improving the quality of teaching and learning in mathematics.

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with staff and learners, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of two lessons.

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The overall effectiveness of the subject, mathematics, was judged to be satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Achievement in mathematics is satisfactory and standards are average.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 The school’s data shows children make good progress in mathematical development.  Results in national tests at the end of Year 6 indicate a good upward trend in mathematics since 2005; achievement rose and standards reached above- average levels in 2007. However, staffing changes since then and a whole-school focus on literacy have meant that improvement in standards has slowed. Currently, standards are broadly average in Years 2 and 6 and pupils’ achievement is satisfactory throughout the school.  Pupils’ calculation skills are good but their capacity to apply their knowledge and understanding is not as strong.  Pupils’ attitudes towards mathematics are good. They persevere in the face of challenges and, when asked, willingly explain their reasoning understanding to others in the class

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning of mathematics

The quality of teaching and learning of mathematics is satisfactory overall and there are good elements.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of mathematics

 Lesson planning is good and the work provided is well differentiated to match pupils’ learning needs.  In all lessons there is a clear focus on mathematical language and the correct use of specific vocabulary.  Pupils have a clear understanding of what they are expected to learn and good opportunities to evaluate what they have achieved at the end of the lesson.  Pupils’ conceptual difficulties are identified and remedied better in some lessons than others. This is a particularly good feature of the teaching in one of the upper junior classes.  Formal assessment is good and better than day to day assessment. For example, the marking of pupils’ work does not always pinpoint their mistakes and help them to learn from them.

p.2

Quality of the mathematics curriculum

The quality of the mathematics curriculum is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of the mathematics curriculum

 Much of the planning is thorough and detailed. This helps pupils to learn calculation skills systematically.  The curriculum is sensitively adapted to meet the needs of pupils requiring additional learning support to enable them to reach their targets and the levels expected. Provision for the most able pupils is largely limited to differentiated activities in lessons.  Although ‘using and applying mathematics’ features in some lessons, there are inconsistencies in provision.

p.2

Leadership and management of mathematics

The leadership and management of mathematics are satisfactory.

p.2

Leadership and management of mathematics

 The involvement of a local authority consultant in 2005/06 had a notable impact on teaching and learning. The school implemented improved assessment and planning strategies and standards began to rise.  Since then, the school has concentrated on literacy. The mathematics subject leader has had few opportunities to carry out a rigorous evaluation of teaching and learning of mathematics across the school. This has made it harder to maintain and improve the quality of teaching at a time when some teachers have joined the school and changed year groups.

p.2

the quality of teaching and learning in mathematics

 The school’s approaches to improving the quality of teaching and learning of mathematics have been particularly effective in the past, more so than they are currently.  There is good expertise in the teaching of mathematics in the school, particularly in the skills of identifying pupils’ misconceptions and using them to sharpen the teaching. However, this expertise is not shared sufficiently to benefit all teachers and pupils.

p.3

Inclusion

 The school has an inclusive ethos. Teachers plan their lessons, taking account of pupils’ different learning needs.  Careful time-tabling of lessons and support group activities ensures that pupils do not miss important opportunities in other areas such as information and communication technology.  The school tracks pupils’ progress carefully to check that boys and girls are doing equally well and acts quickly to provide additional support for any pupils in danger of not reaching the levels expected in mathematics.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 ensuring that the teaching of mathematics is checked with the purpose of improving pupils’ learning  sharing the good practice that already exists in school to improve teachers’ subject knowledge  ensuring teaching and marking of pupils’ work focuses more sharply on identifying pupils’ understanding and misconceptions and using these to improve their learning of mathematics.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop mathematics in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As explained in our previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion