Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 19 Apr 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Susan Orpin

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Susan Orpin

  • Postcode verified

    IG8 9LA

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+52Positivemore positive than 80% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingexceptionalstrongexcellentexceptionallystrengthsenjoysafe
Criticismlacknot yetinsufficientnot securenot clearlynot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings502w+54
  • Leadership148w+40
  • What needs to improve62w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
687
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 71%Leadership 21%What needs to improve 9%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enqiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Miss Cleland Headteacher Woodford County High School High Road Woodford Green Essex IG8 9LA

p.1

Education (PSHE)

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 13 and 14 March to look at work in PSHE.

p.1

Education (PSHE)

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on:

p.1

Education (PSHE)

 how the PSHE curriculum meets the specific needs of pupils in your local area, and how progress is tracked and assessed; and  the contribution made by PSHE to the future economic wellbeing of your pupils.

p.1

Education (PSHE)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Education (PSHE)

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with yourself, the assistant headteacher, the careers/PSHE co-ordinator, a group of Year 9 and Year 10 students, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of students’ work and observation of seven lessons and an assembly.

p.1

Education (PSHE)

The overall effectiveness of PSHE was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement in PSHE

 Students’ behaviour and their attitudes to learning PSHE are outstanding.  Students thoroughly enjoy PSHE, especially discussion, and want to spend more time learning the subject.  Students have a very good knowledge about how to keep safe and healthy.  All students are making exceptional progress in developing confidence, becoming independent and taking responsibility.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning in PSHE

 Relationships between teachers and students are outstanding.  Many teachers are confident in the use of interactive and stimulating activities and their expectations of students are suitably challenging.  A few teachers are less secure in the use of suitable teaching strategies for PSHE, so at times their lessons lack stimulation.  The care, guidance and support for students are outstanding, so students feel very safe.  Assessment is developing, but does not yet clearly show students’ rates of progress.  Information and communication technology (ICT) is not yet widely used in the subject.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

 The PSHE programme is comprehensive, challenging and enjoyable, meeting all students’ needs well.  Other subjects make a strong contribution and links are clearly made, so students perceive skills as transferable. However, this does lead to some duplication at times.  The lesson time available for PSHE is sometimes insufficient for extended discussion and there is some imbalance of time allocated to PSHE for different year groups.  The enrichment of the PSHE curriculum is excellent, through a wide range of relevant extracurricular activities and an extensive list of visitors.

p.2

Leadership and management of PSHE

The leadership and management of PSHE are good.

p.2

Leadership and management of PSHE

 The welcoming and supportive ethos makes a very strong contribution to students’ personal development and wellbeing.  Senior leaders have a clear and accurate view of the strengths and areas for development.  There is not yet a clear and formal monitoring programme for the teaching of the subject.  A few teachers lack specialist training and support in the subject.

p.2

well-being?

Students are prepared for adult life in an outstanding way.

p.3

well-being?

 Students from Year 7 onwards begin to explore the world of work through careers education. Later their experience is extended through Enterprise activities and work experience. In the Sixth Form, students are prepared for higher education.  The careers and enterprise education are strengths, providing students with a clear insight into the world of work, motivating them and helping them to understand the skills they will need.

p.3

Inclusion

 All students are suitably challenged in most PSHE lessons.  The harmonious atmosphere and avid discussions between students from a wider range of ethnic backgrounds means they are exceptionally well prepared for life in a multi-cultural society.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 develop more assessment tasks for PSHE.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop PSHE in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion