Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 31 Mar 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jan Bennett

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jan Bennett

  • Postcode verified

    DN14 9NS

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+95Very positivemore positive than 99% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandinggood progressexcellenteffectivevery effectivevery wellvery highstrong

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings687w+93
  • Leadership129w+84
  • What needs to improve83w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
874
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 65%Leadership 12%What needs to improve 8%About the inspection 15%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms Annette Dews Headteacher Holy Family Catholic High School Carlton Goole East Riding of Yorkshire DN14 9NS

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 4 and 5 February 2008 to look at work in mathematics.

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

As outlined in our initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on the effectiveness of the school’s approaches to improving the quality of teaching and learning in mathematics.

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with staff and students, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of students’ work and observation of five lessons.

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The overall effectiveness of the subject, mathematics, was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Achievement in mathematics is good and standards are above average.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 In Key Stage 3, students’ achievement is outstanding and standards are very high. In 2007, students made significantly good progress between Key Stages 2 and 4 but achievement in Key Stage 4 has not been as good as in Key Stage 3. GCSE pass rates are slightly higher than average.  A group of students from Years 9, 10 and 11 study GCSE statistics after school and a high proportion achieve passes at grades A* to C.  The school’s assessment data and the standard of work in lessons show that an increasing number of students are performing at a high level. The school is expecting higher standards in Key Stage 4 this year.  Students are making especially good progress in dialogic lessons where the teaching and learning involves them in much more discussion and less written work. They can solve very complex problems and are working at a higher level than expected.  The school has achieved most of the targets that relate to its mathematics and

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning of mathematics

The quality of teaching and learning of mathematics is good with some outstanding features.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of mathematics

 Teachers have an enthusiasm for mathematics that engenders an enjoyment in learning. They plan lessons well and have very good skills of classroom management.  Students are comfortable using precise mathematical language and are able to articulate their thinking clearly. They are willing to attempt difficult questions and are not afraid to say that they do not understand.  Learning is outstanding in lessons taught using the dialogic approach. Students take responsibility for their own learning, help each other to understand and challenge each other’s thinking. They discuss complex concepts with both confidence and maturity and have acquired very good problem solving skills.  Students are fully aware of the level/grade at which they are working. They say that monitoring progress against a target motivates them and they particularly appreciate the tracking of performance in practice examination papers in Year

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of mathematics

11. Students are encouraged to assess their own learning and that of their peers.

p.2

Quality of the mathematics curriculum

The quality of the mathematics curriculum is good.

p.2

Quality of the mathematics curriculum

 Good intervention strategies and revision programmes help students to prepare for national tests and examinations. The homework club offers help each week.  Interactive whiteboards are used well to enhance learning in the vast majority of lessons and the computer suite and laptops are used from time to time.  Students are entered for the national mathematics challenges. Cross-curricular activities and trips focusing on mathematics have been introduced.  The department works with primary schools in a number of different ways including running a ten-week course for gifted and talented Year 6 pupils. As part of the school’s specialist status, teachers visit primary schools in an advisory capacity and mathematics staff run a mathematics club at a local primary school.

p.2

Leadership and management of mathematics

The leadership and management of mathematics are outstanding.

p.2

Leadership and management of mathematics

 A new head of department was appointed in September. She is very capable and energetic and has made an excellent start. She is very ably supported by an assistant headteacher who teaches mathematics and senior leaders who know the department very well.  Performance management is very strong and includes a schedule of work scrutiny, interviews with students, formal lesson observations and monitoring visits to lessons.  The department’s analysis of performance is very incisive and accurate and development planning is sharply focused and effective.  The department is continuously striving to improve and is keen to try new initiatives and share good practice with other departments and schools. The head of department is utilising the specialist schools’ network well.

p.2

the quality of teaching and learning in mathematics

 The school has very effective strategies for improving the quality of teaching and learning. Lesson observations and monitoring visits accurately identify areas for improvement and there is a clear link between these and training for staff.  The school makes very good use of external consultants and external training courses but some of the most effective improvements are as a result of peer observation, skilled mentoring and the sharing of good practice within school.

p.3

Inclusion

Inclusion in mathematics is outstanding.

p.3

Inclusion

 The school has a high proportion of students with learning difficulties and/or disabilities. They attend mainstream mathematics lessons and are integrated extremely well. The large team of teaching assistants has a wide range of skills and is deployed very effectively. Teaching assistants work closely with teachers and are encouraged to develop specialist or subject expertise.  Effective intervention strategies support students who are finding mathematics difficult. Gifted and talented students are challenged and stretched.  Performance data is analysed very carefully to ensure that all groups of students are progressing well. No group of students under-perform.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 improve students’ progress in Key Stage 4 to match that in Key Stage 3  look for further ways to utilise information and communication technology to enhance learning.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop mathematics in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As explained in our previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion