Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 25 Feb 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

June Tracey

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    June Tracey

  • Postcode verified

    CW9 6HQ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+70Positivemore positive than 69% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseenjoyrigorouswell plannedeffectiveimprovedaccuratelyclearlyclear
Criticismnot confidentnot consistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings485w+55
  • Leadership197w+71
  • What needs to improve91w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
758
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 53%Leadership 22%What needs to improve 10%About the inspection 15%

Full report text

Mrs J Cottam-Marshall Headteacher Great Budworth C of E Primary School School Lane Great Budworth Northwich Cheshire CW9 6HQ

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 survey inspection programme – mathematics

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 15 January 2008 to look at work in mathematics. As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on pupils’ enjoyment and understanding of mathematics.

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 survey inspection programme – mathematics

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 survey inspection programme – mathematics

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of three lessons.

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 survey inspection programme – mathematics

The overall effectiveness of the subject, mathematics, was judged to be satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Achievement is satisfactory. Standards are broadly average.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Children’s mathematical development on entry to the school is similar to others of age 3/4 years. Pupils make satisfactory progress in the Foundation Stage and throughout the school. By Year 6, almost all reach the standard expected for their age (Level 4) and some exceed it. Because the numbers in each year group are very small, it is not generally meaningful to compare results in tests taken in Year 6 with national statistics. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk  Pupils are competent in manipulating numbers and in applying routine mathematical skills. They are less confident when working through problems written in words or where there are alternative approaches.  The mathematics targets for 2008 are challenging, but achievable.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning

 The rigorous evaluation of teaching and assessment procedures last term, and subsequent action, is leading to rising levels of challenge for pupils of all abilities.  Oral work is well planned and is increasing pupils’ confidence in working with numbers mentally. Planning for problem solving and investigative work is less consistent. Where it is good, pupils reason well and delve deep into their previous learning for answers.  Support from a well-directed team of teaching assistants is effective because it focuses accurately on needs that are pinpointed through the upgraded and well- designed assessment system.  Written work is marked thoroughly, providing pupils with meaningful comments about how to improve.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

 The curriculum is stimulating and flexible. High priority is given to the integral development of pupils’ language, communication and mathematical skills.  The organisation of the mixed-age classes is good. It enables pupils of different ages to work with others at a similar stage of learning. The success they achieve when working collaboratively raises their confidence and self-esteem.  Strategic planning incorporates good opportunities for pupils to apply mathematics to other subjects of the curriculum. Older pupils describe clearly how mathematics enables them to reach conclusions in the work they do in science, geography and history.  The most able pupils in Year 6 enjoy and benefit from opportunities to apply critical thinking skills and logic to mathematical problems in master classes arranged for them this year at a local high school. They share these experiences with their classmates in Year 6 so that all benefit.

p.2

Leadership and management

 You and the subject co-ordinator were new to the positions in September 2007. Collaborative leadership and self-critical evaluation of every aspect of the work in mathematics, including pupils’ results and progress, has led to a rise in expectations and significant improvement in the consistency of pupils’ work, particularly in Years 5 and 6. Consequently, standards are rising and progress is faster than before, as is evident from the current assessment records.  Leaders and governors are challenging and proactive in determining what can be improved in mathematics, and how. They prioritise areas for improvement and are rigorous in checking the outcomes of actions on pupils’ progress in the subject.

p.2

Subject issue: pupils’ enjoyment and understanding of mathematics

Pupils and teachers are responding well to recent changes and initiatives. Pupils appear to enjoy mathematics, particularly when the work extends beyond the routine of repetitive exercises. Pupils of all ages become excited when they reason difficult things out for themselves. Teachers could capitalise on this by providing more opportunities for pupils to tackle open-ended questions and reach their own conclusions. Pupils enjoy solving simple problems. They have clear strategies for dealing with them but need more practice with complex problems that involve a number of operations.

p.3

Inclusion

Provision in mathematics for the needs of pupils of all abilities, including those with learning difficulties and/or disabilities, is satisfactory. Pupils’ personal development and respect for others are indicative of the good quality wrap-round care provided by the school. Pupils mature well in this small community because good relationships between the staff and pupils foster a sense of calm and well-being. Pupils leave the school with secure foundations in basic mathematical skills.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 providing pupils with regular opportunities for open-ended investigative work by integrating this into the strategic planning for all classes  sustaining the current level of challenge in mathematics by teachers in order to raise achievement further for all pupils.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop mathematics in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion