Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Paul Hancock
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop design and technology in the school. p.3
- As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your Local Authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. p.3
- It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 591
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 41, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology
Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 6 March 2008 to look at work in Design and Technology (D&T).
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology
The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and learners, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of lessons.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology
The overall effectiveness of D&T was judged to be satisfactory, confirming your self evaluation.
p.1
Achievement and standards
Achievement and standards in D&T are satisfactory.
p.1
Achievement and standards
Pupils start in Year 3 with average skills and capability in D&T. They make satisfactory progress and standards are average by the end of Year 6. D&T capability is systematically developed using an appropriate range of materials such as textiles, food, wood and clay to design and make products. Electronic and mechanical components are effectively used in project work, for example when making models of jitter creatures and siege machines. Work seen from a recent residential course on problem solving and enterprise supported the development of D&T capability well. The school Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Achievement and standards
Mrs J Leishman Headteacher Anston Park Junior School Park Avenue North Anston Sheffield S252QZ has rightly made the improvement of design skills such as evaluating ideas and prototypes a key priority for future development. Pupils especially enjoy engaging in the creative and practical aspects of D&T and speak positively about the creative risks and challenges the subject presents.
p.1
Quality of teaching and learning
The quality of teaching and learning in D&T is satisfactory.
p.2
Quality of teaching and learning
Making skills are consistently taught across the year groups. Pupils work with precision and accuracy, for example in Years 3 and 4 when designing and making models of Tudor furniture and in Year 6 when making models of boats to escape from a desert island. More progressive teaching of design skills is an area for development, particularly when evaluating the effectiveness of individual ideas and design proposals. Teachers’ subject knowledge makes sure pupils can make products which reflect individual thoughts and ideas. The school acknowledges that giving feedback on how to improve D&T work more consistent across year groups is another priority. There is good practice, for example, in Year 6 which is being shared across the school.
p.2
Quality of the curriculum
The quality of the curriculum is satisfactory.
p.2
Quality of the curriculum
The curriculum is effectively planned to meet national programmes of study and the needs of the pupils. They use a sound range of tools, components and equipment to realise their designs and QCA units are successfully aligned with topic and project work. Recent revisions to the curriculum are well set to further improve progress and raise achievement in D&T. A new emphasis on consistently developing key skills across all year groups has recently been introduced.
p.2
Leadership and management of D&T
Leadership and management of D&T are satisfactory.
p.2
Leadership and management of D&T
Examples and records of D&T work are effectively used to provide evidence of performance over time. The school accurately evaluates leadership and management at all levels of the subject to be satisfactory overall. The subject is moving forward and the school is expecting improvement in achievement and standards as a result of the recent changes made, for example to the curriculum. Management capacity to ensure D&T can thrive is good at a time when it has to face many other priorities.
p.2
Inclusion
Boys and girls are effectively included in the full range of D&T activities. Support for pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities in D&T is good and they are equally involved in all aspects of work.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
developing the effectiveness of key design skills such as analysis and evaluation giving feedback to pupils on how to improve their D&T work more consistent across the year groups.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop design and technology in the school.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your Local Authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion