Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 25 Apr 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Paul Dowgill

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Paul Dowgill

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+75Very positivemore positive than 76% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentclearmake good progressenjoyclearlyeffectivelypositiveconfident
Criticismvariable

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

About the inspectionFindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings671w+56
  • Leadership271w+77
  • What needs to improve107w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,020
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 56%Leadership 22%What needs to improve 9%About the inspection 13%

Full report text

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Geography

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 28 February 2008 to look at work in geography.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Geography

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a focus on the school’s response to ‘Excellence and Enjoyment’ and how this is impacting on provision in geography, particularly in terms of planning and progression.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Geography

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Geography

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of data, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of one lesson.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Geography

The overall effectiveness of geography is good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Achievement is good and standards are in line with national expectations.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Given their starting points, pupils’ achievement overall in geography is good. They make good progress in lessons.  At the end of Key Stage 1, pupils are able to describe simple differences in places at a range of scales. They have a basic factual knowledge of certain countries and are aware of some similarities and differences between them. They know that different modes of Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Achievement and standards

Mr Sutton Headteacher Horfield Church of England Primary School Bishop Manor Road Westbury-on-Trym Bristol BS10 5BD transport have to be used to reach different countries. They understand the purpose of maps and are beginning to draw and label simple maps. They can explain the difference between a village, town and city.  At the end of Key Stage 2, pupils are able to write persuasive arguments for decisions such as the advantages and disadvantages of building a new airport. They have a sound understanding of physical processes, for example, how mountains are formed. Their place knowledge is good and they can describe where various countries and features, such as mountain ranges, are located. They know how to use an atlas to look up information and find specific places.  Through the school’s international links, pupils are developing their knowledge and understanding of countries not usually taught, including Uganda, Poland and Sweden. They speak enthusiastically

p.1

Achievement and standards

about the school’s links with these countries.  Pupils enjoy geography and are keen to be involved in lessons. Their behaviour is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of geography

 Teachers plan lessons that have clear learning outcomes and a variety of activities to ensure that these are met. The outcomes are shared with the pupils so they know what the focus of the learning is.  Lessons are clearly structured and a range of activities and pupil groupings are used well to ensure engagement in learning. Teachers make good use of the interactive white board and a wide variety of printed resources to support learning.  A variety of approaches is used well in plenaries to recap what pupils have learnt and identify the next stages.  Overall, pupils’ work confirms that the curriculum is being covered, but there is less evidence to indicate that the strategies identified in the medium term plans, to meet the needs of all pupils, are fully carried out in lessons.  Pupils’ work in geography is marked regularly but the quality of marking is variable. In the best examples, marking focuses on what

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of geography

pupils have learnt and how they can improve this.

p.2

Quality of curriculum

 The curriculum is broad and balanced with published schemes of work being adapted where appropriate to meet the school’s needs.  The blocking of the curriculum ensures that pupils get a short, yet intensive, experience of geography on a regular basis. The delivery of geography in blocks ensures that there is sufficient time provided to deliver each unit.  The school’s international links are used very effectively to provide a context for learning in specific units. A very good example of this is the Year 6 unit on mountains which has been adapted to further extend learning from the school’s visit to southern Poland.  There are good opportunities for fieldwork in each year including residential and international visits in Years 5 and 6. The development of fieldwork skills is not mapped across the curriculum.  There are good displays in classrooms to support the topics being taught.

p.2

Leadership and management of geography

Leadership and management of geography are good.

p.3

Leadership and management of geography

 Although the coordinator is new in post, she has already had a positive impact on the subject. She is clear about the need to further improve standards and how this can be achieved.  There is a clear policy in place which makes good links to the key concepts in the National Curriculum and the school’s international work.  A review of the curriculum by mapping the skills and aspects across all the units has provided the coordinator with a clear view of progression in geography.  There is regular monitoring and evaluation of the work in geography through the scrutiny of pupils’ work, teachers’ planning and lesson observation. The outcomes of this have been used by the coordinator to inform her evaluation of geography and form the basis of the subject action plan.

p.3

Subject issue

The impact of curriculum planning on progression and the quality of provision in geography is good.

p.3

Subject issue

 Geography is using the school’s excellent international links to good effect in making the curriculum more relevant for the pupils.  The school is piloting a thematic approach to learning in one year group using ‘journeys’ as the overall guiding theme. Geography is involved in this.  Teachers are becoming more confident in adapting published schemes to meet the needs of pupils and are linking these to school initiatives such as Eco School status.  There is one afternoon of enrichment activities each week which allows pupils to select the topics they wish to study. Geographical units are offered as part of this curriculum and extend the work of the usual curriculum.

p.3

Inclusion

The provision for inclusion in geography is good overall.

p.4

Inclusion

 Planning at the scheme of work level clearly identifies strategies and activities to meet the needs of specific groups. Good reference is made to ways in which support and extension tasks can be provided for individuals.  In the lesson observed, questioning was widely distributed and involved all pupils. Boys and girls were full involved.  Pupils reported that they were fully involved in lessons and that they were given support when needed.

p.4

Areas for improvement

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include the need to:

p.4

Areas for improvement

 sharpen the action plan so that the success criteria focus on improving standards  develop the assessment strategy to include the use of National Curriculum levels in each unit of work and identify this in the medium term plans  ensure the planned strategies for meeting the needs of all pupils are carried out in all lessons.

p.4

Areas for improvement

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for the next institutional inspection.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion