Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 18 Apr 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Clare Gillies

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Clare Gillies

  • Postcode verified

    RM10 9YR

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+74Very positivemore positive than 92% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentstrongeffectivevery wellhigh qualityconfidentthoughtfulhappy
Criticismseriouslyconcerning

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings827w+64
  • Leadership150w+75
  • What needs to improve88w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,032
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%Leadership 12%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 12%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms D Wiles Headteacher The Leys Primary School Leys Avenue Dagenham Essex RM10 9YR

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 subject survey inspection programme: citizenship

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 14 February 2008 to look at work in citizenship.

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 subject survey inspection programme: citizenship

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on provision for teaching and learning about Britain’s diversity.

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 subject survey inspection programme: citizenship

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 subject survey inspection programme: citizenship

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of five lessons.

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 subject survey inspection programme: citizenship

The overall effectiveness of citizenship was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Pupils have a very good understanding of what rights and responsibilities mean. The school offers them many opportunities to take on roles of responsibility.  School council members perform their roles seriously and the council is effective at getting things done. It is excellent that all the suggestions put forward and the school’s response to them are displayed. Pupils are realistic and understand that money is often the key factor determining whether they can have what they want.  The maturity of the school council is exemplified by how pupils vote for those whom they know will represent them fairly and get things done. This has led to an articulate and confident council.  Pupils are aware of the needs of others and how people can help each other. They have a simple understanding of voluntary organisations, for example through the UNICEF ‘Day for Change’.  Pupils are developing good, formal debating skills and learning how to

p.1

Achievement and standards

evaluate two sides of an argument. This practice could be extended by having debates between and within mixed age groups.  Pupils are reasonably aware of sustainability issues, particularly recycling. It is helpful that the new Children’s Centre being built on site is an environmentally friendly building.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of citizenship

The quality of teaching and learning is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of citizenship

 A striking feature of pupils’ personal, social, health and citizenship (PSHCE) books is the high quality of marking. Teachers make thoughtful comments and then pose a question to extend pupils’ thinking. Pupils respond with interesting ideas.  All citizenship lessons, or lessons with links to the subject, are delivered in a happy, supportive manner which encourages children to articulate their ideas and thoughts. Teachers are good at linking work to what has been done in previous lessons.  Interactive whiteboards are used effectively to show materials relevant to topics or to display pupils’ writing for discussion.  A good Year 6 lesson debate, on whether children should have a television in their bedroom, would have been even better if the pupils had done some individual research beforehand.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

 The nursery curriculum includes a strong emphasis on developing pupils’ understanding of fairness, empathy with others’ feelings and the need to help people.  A generous amount of time is allocated to PSHCE and religious education (RE). Work is planned carefully to revisit topics each year at a higher level of understanding.  Pupils discuss drugs education linked to how the media reports on related issues.  The PSHCE programme includes elements of social and emotional aspects of learning (SEAL). Pupils study issues concerning bullying and appreciate that a good citizen would never bully anyone.  The school uses its surroundings well to help pupils see their place in the local community.  The school regularly hosts outside speakers. Year 5 work on democracy is brought to life when the local member of parliament visits to answer their questions, such as “What does it take to be an MP?”  A talk about young carers for Year 3 pupils is a very good way of

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

helping them to understand how they have different lifestyles and commitments.  Much of the work in religious education is linked to important citizenship ideas. Learning about the roles of the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Pope, for example, pupils consider the importance of leadership and whether men and women are equally good leaders.

p.3

Leadership and management of citizenship

The leadership and management of citizenship are good.

p.3

Leadership and management of citizenship

 You enthusiastically put into practice your PSHCE policy statement that pupils should “participate fully in society and value themselves and others”. You support the school council very well. All the school’s aims and policies focus on respect, responsibility and community.  The new citizenship coordinator has already purchased some up-to- date resources and attended some useful courses. She appreciates the importance of this subject and has good ideas for its further growth.  The document describing the rights and responsibilities of staff, governors, parents and pupils is a valuable and effective way to help pupils understand that all members of society must be treated respectfully and fairly.  Your strong focus on developing pupils’ personal and social skills is a continuing strength of the school’s provision. It nurtures pupils’ awareness of what it means to be a thoughtful and kind citizen.

p.3

Subject issue: teaching and learning about Britain’s diversity

 Through religious education and PSHCE lessons, pupils learn to empathise with different faiths and backgrounds.  Pupils happily engage in debate about their own backgrounds and value the diversity of the school community. They understand Britishness is a difficult concept to define and discuss it with interest.  You observe that as a direct result of your focused work there has been a significant drop in the number of racist and bullying incidents.  In Year 5, pupils consider the feelings of someone new to the UK. This is a good way of developing their understanding of Britain’s diversity.

p.3

Inclusion

 Whether teachers are preparing work or using outside organisations, they ensure that citizenship work is planned for pupils’ different abilities so that all of them are fully involved.  Teachers mark PSHCE work thoughtfully so that all pupils’ ideas, whatever their ability, are extended.  Anger management sessions successfully help some pupils to cope with school life so that they can join in all lessons. A few pupils, for example, use puppets to help others adapt their behaviour or cope with problems.  All the languages spoken by the pupils are respected in a lively display in the entrance hall. The school celebrates many other cultures and traditions, such as the Chinese New Year and African masks.  Year 6 work on Martin Luther King has a positive impact on pupils’ awareness of human rights.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 helping pupils in all year groups to research and debate topical issues more often  involving the school council in discussion about what it could do for people in the local community.

p.4

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop citizenship in the school.

p.4

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion