Other · Ofsted letter
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Champak Chauhan
- Postcode verified
DE55 6HH
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 801
- about usual (typical 963)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Mrs E L Charles Headteacher Morton Primary School Main Road Morton Alfreton Derbyshire DE55 6HH
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – History
Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 05 February 2008 to look at work in history.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – History
As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on information and communication technology (ICT).
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – History
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – History
The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and the observation of one lesson.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – History
The overall effectiveness of history was judged to be satisfactory.
p.1
Achievement and standards
Achievement and standards are satisfactory.
p.1
Achievement and standards
Pupils are soundly developing their knowledge and understanding of various historical topics. Pupils in Key Stage 1 have a basic understanding of the Great Fire of London, while those in Key Stage 2 are developing a better understanding of, for example, Henry VIII and his six wives, toys and games in Tudor times and the invasion of parts of England by the Vikings. Pupils can competently use different historical sources. However, their skills in interpreting them are limited because they do not have access to a wide enough range of such sources. Pupils do not always write extensively. Pupils’ attitudes to learning and their behaviour are excellent. They settle down quickly to the tasks set and some are keen to ask and answer questions in whole-class discussions. They work productively in small groups and when working with the adults.
p.1
Quality of teaching and learning
The quality of teaching and learning is satisfactory with good features.
p.2
Quality of teaching and learning
Lessons are conscientiously planned. Learning objectives and outcomes are identified and these are routinely shared with the pupils. The challenge for the pupils is satisfactory and this gets better when they are researching topics for themselves. Some are interested in the subject and they enjoy undertaking research work. The good features of teaching include the creation of a good learning environment by the staff. They do this through their good skills in organising and managing various learning activities. However, the needs of some pupils are not always identified in the planning and teaching. A scrutiny of pupils’ written work, for example, does not show how the more able, including the gifted and talented, are challenged. Marking is regularly undertaken by the staff. However, comments for pupils tend to be brief and they do not always indicate to pupils how to improve their work. Short-term targets for improvement are not
p.2
Quality of the curriculum
The quality of the curriculum is satisfactory.
p.2
Quality of the curriculum
The school has recently undertaken a significant review of its whole- school curriculum. There is now a greater emphasis on the role of the ‘creative’ curriculum and a desire to offer stimulating learning experiences for all pupils. The history curriculum is planned over a two-year cycle and it is supported by study units produced by the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA). This planning cycle is sound as long as there is no repetition in the content being covered for the different year groups. Pupils’ experiences are enriched by visits to places of historical interest, for example Chatsworth House and RAF Cosford. A visit to the British Museum is planned for July 2008. This aspect of provision is still relatively limited.
p.2
Leadership and management
Leadership and management are satisfactory.
p.3
Leadership and management
The history coordinator assumed responsibility for history in September 2007. She also has responsibilities for two other subjects in this small school. The coordinator’s role is developing. She has developed a sound understanding of history within the school in a short time and she has taken a lead role in developing long-term curriculum planning. It is anticipated that her role in monitoring and evaluating the subject will be strengthened in the near future.
p.3
Subject issue: ICT
The use of ICT is satisfactory with good features.
p.3
Subject issue: ICT
Teachers use the interactive whiteboard confidently and competently. Pupils of all ages thoroughly enjoy working on the computers. They are developing their ICT skills well. Pupils in Years 3 and 4, for example, can confidently use search engines to find suitable sites for research. Participation rates in extracurricular activities are good. The school runs two ICT clubs and it is reported that both of these are well attended. The school is planning to enhance ICT provision this academic year by investing a further £8000 to buy more hardware and software.
p.3
Inclusion
Teachers know the needs of individual pupils well. The work planned for different groups of pupils is generally appropriate. Lower attaining pupils make satisfactory progress, especially when they are offered additional support by the adults. However, the needs of the more able, including the gifted and talented, are not always properly met.
p.3
ensure that:
pupils undertake a wider range of extended writing in history so that their literacy skills are improved pupils’ skills in history are better developed through the use of a broader range of sources marking shows pupils how to improve their work the needs of higher attaining pupils, including the gifted and talented, are better met. I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop history in the school.
p.3
ensure that:
As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion