Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 25 Feb 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Rosemary Matthews

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Rosemary Matthews

  • Postcode verified

    SE10 9LA

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+89Very positivemore positive than 92% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisegood progressvery wellindependentmake good progresshigh expectationseffectiveenjoyconsistently
Criticismat riskweaknesseslowergapsbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings523w+84
  • Leadership192w+85
  • What needs to improve81w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
774
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 57%Leadership 21%What needs to improve 9%About the inspection 14%

Full report text

Mrs N Deane Headteacher James Wolfe Primary School Randall Place London SE10 9LA

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme: English

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 18 January to look at work in English.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme: English

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject the visit had a particular focus on our current survey theme: provision for independent learning. The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme: English

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of three lessons. The overall effectiveness of English was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Achievement is good. Standards are average.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Attainment on entry to the school is below average although some pupils have high levels of attainment. All pupils, whatever their background or ability, achieve well. They make good progress and a high proportion of those who are lower attaining make very good progress, as do pupils who are deaf. By the end of Key Stage 2, standards are average.  Standards of speaking and listening are good. Pupils speak with increasing confidence and express their views well. They listen attentively to their teachers and to each other.  Good attention to literacy skills enables pupils to make good progress in subjects across the curriculum. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk  English makes a good contribution to the personal development of pupils, for example, when pupils of different ages and with widely varying needs work together; in taking responsibility for initiatives in

p.1

Achievement and standards

school, and during enrichment activities.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of English

The quality of teaching and learning is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of English

 Teachers have good subject knowledge and high expectations. Skills are thoroughly and systematically taught. Good planning for lessons and good support for individual pupils meets the diverse needs of learners well.  Lessons are interesting and appropriately challenging. Effective use of a wide range of techniques and good quality resources, including technology and media texts, make learning meaningful and enjoyable. Highly competent support staff contribute significantly to learning.  Pupils have very positive attitudes to learning, enjoy English and work hard. Encouraging and supportive marking and targets that are known well by pupils are helping them to improve their writing in particular and contribute to good progress.  The progress of individual pupils is tracked systematically and very well. Those at risk of underachievement receive timely and effective support. Accurate moderation of writing ensures consistency in teacher

p.2

Quality of curriculum

 The curriculum is rich, varied and planned carefully and well to ensure progression, suitability and relevance. Good attention to resources from a range of cultures offers a broad experience of English.  Cross curricular links with English are made very well and good opportunities for speaking and listening in particular develop and reinforce literacy. A good range of enrichment activities also enhances learning.  Interventions are well planned, well targeted, well delivered and result in good gains in learning. The current focus on writing has improved the achievement of both higher and lower attaining pupils.

p.2

Leadership and management of English

 Good leadership ensures good provision and contributes to pupils’ good progress. The school has a very clear and accurate understanding of its strengths and weaknesses, clear priorities and a good grasp of how to improve. Action to improve writing is appropriate and well targeted.  Very good analysis and evaluation of data and systematic tracking of progress inform the setting of targets and strategies for support and intervention well.  Good provision for professional development improves teachers’ subject knowledge and that of support staff, and underpins consistently good practice.

p.2

Provision for independent learning

Provision for independent learning is satisfactory with good features.

p.3

Provision for independent learning

 Pupils gain in confidence in all aspects of the subject from sound and developing opportunities for independent learning.  The school has a strong culture of reading for pleasure and promotes pupils’ independent reading well. Pupils are helped to structure their writing and become increasingly independent. Pupils enjoy discussion, although few generate their own questions readily. Independent learning is promoted well through homework tasks and the use of technology.  Very good relationships between pupils and staff consistently encourage independent attitudes. Good opportunities for pair work and self-reflection also promote independent learning.

p.3

Inclusion

 The school’s commitment to all pupils achieving their best is clear in outcomes and practice. It is very responsive to the needs of individuals and meets their learning and support needs well.  Pupils from minority ethnic groups, those learning English as an additional language, and pupils with learning difficulties make equally good progress. Class teachers and staff from the centre for the deaf work together very well to ensure pupils are fully integrated into lessons and to secure very good progress.  Provision for intervention programmes in English is very good. Well targeted and well delivered interventions close gaps in attainment.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 continuing to raise standards in English, as identified by the school  continuing to improve provision for independent learning.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop English in the school. As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term and made available to the team for the next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion