Other · Ofsted letter
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Peter Sanderson
- Postcode verified
SE19 1PA
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop science in the school. p.3
- As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. p.3
- It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance2
“Leadership and management in science are good.” p.3Communication & language2
“Effective extra help is also given to those pupils for whom English is an additional language.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 773
- about usual (typical 963)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Ms A C Kemal Headteacher Paxton Primary School Woodland Road London SE19 1PA
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science
Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 6 February 2008 to look at work in science.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science
As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of science, the visit had a particular focus on transition within and between phases (F-KS1- KS2-KS3); the range of learning experiences; the status and use of SC1.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science
The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of four lessons.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science
The overall effectiveness of science was judged to be good.
p.1
Achievement and standards
Standards in science are average and achievement is good.
p.1
Achievement and standards
Children have a good start to their science education in the nursery and reception classes. From a starting point below expectations they make good progress in developing their knowledge and understanding of the world around them. Standards at the end of Year 2 have improved in recent years and are now broadly average. Standards at the end of year 6 are similar to the national average. Pupils make good progress in science throughout the school. Pupils have positive attitudes towards learning in science. They behave very well in lessons and willingly become actively involved in the tasks that are planned for them. The opportunities provided for pupils to work in groups develops their team working skills well. When working in groups pupils show very good awareness of the needs of others.
p.1
Quality of teaching and learning of science
The overall quality of teaching and learning in science is good.
p.2
Quality of teaching and learning of science
Lessons are well planned around learning outcomes. Teachers make clear to pupils what they must be able to do if they are to be successful in the lesson. These strategies promote learning well. All teachers encourage pupils to succeed. Lessons are characterised by good relationships. Most lessons contain interesting activities that engage and interest pupils. This promotes pupils’ enjoyment of science well. Teachers make good use of questioning to both check and develop pupils’ learning. Teachers assess pupils’ knowledge and understanding of science regularly through both teacher assessments and tests. A new system to assess pupils’ skills of scientific enquiry has recently been developed but has not yet been fully implemented. Most work is marked with helpful comments that give pupils advice about how to improve. Pupils have little opportunity to assess the quality of their own work or reflect on their own developing understanding of ideas and concepts in
p.2
Quality of the curriculum
The science curriculum is well planned and covers the requirements of the National Curriculum. A commercial science scheme is well adapted by teachers to ensure that it meets the broad range of children’s needs within the school. Opportunities for pupils to develop their skills of scientific enquiry are well integrated into schemes of work. Information communication technology (ICT) is being increasingly used in the school to promote learning. However, the full potential of ICT to promote and develop learning in science is not yet being fully exploited. The school provides pupils with a range of science related trips and activities that enrich their learning experience.
p.2
Leadership and management of science
Leadership and management in science are good.
p.3
Leadership and management of science
Good self evaluation procedures are in place to assess the quality of provision and outcomes in science. Both you and the science co-ordinator has a good understanding of the strengths and weaknesses in science. A regular self evaluation document is provided for governors. The science development plan identifies the right priorities but the success criteria are not sufficiently specific or measurable. Pupils’ progress in science is tracked centrally. The co-ordinator analyses these data to identify pupils who are underachieving. Targeted support is then provided for these pupils. The smooth transition of pupils through the school is aided by the good assessment records that follow pupils as they move from one class to another. Good links exist with local secondary schools. However, a specific science transition project is not currently in place.
p.3
Inclusion
The school has a welcoming, inclusive ethos in which all children learn well in science. Careful consideration is given to the organisation of groups of pupils in lessons and the teaching strategies employed in order to ensure that all pupils have equal access to the science curriculum. Teaching assistants give pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities very good support in lessons. Effective extra help is also given to those pupils for whom English is an additional language. All groups of pupils are well supported, carefully tracked and make good progress.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
ensuring that pupils have greater opportunity to assess their own work and reflect on their own developing understanding of scientific ideas and concepts fully implementing the recently developed assessment system to track the development of pupils’ skills of scientific enquiry ensuring that greater use is made of ICT within science lessons to promote pupils’ learning.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop science in the school. As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion