Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Provision in construction was judged to be inadequate. p.1
- Timely reviews are undertaken but some target setting is weak and there is insufficient reinforcement and checking of equality of opportunities. p.3
- This was identified in the previous self-assessment report as being inadequate in both learner volume and outcomes. p.4
- Light reduction film is to be fitted to the large windows and new carpet fitted, but the college recognises that existing environmental control equipment is not sufficiently effective. p.5
- The college has identified poor retention of adult learners on information communications technology (ICT) qualifications as a key factor contributing to the fall in success rates. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 1,577
- longer than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Context
Basingstoke College of Technology is a general further education college located in the largely rural borough of Basingstoke and Deane. Basingstoke is a significant commercial location with over 3,000 predominantly high-value companies. Unemployment rates are consistently below the national average and some 81% of school leavers continue in full-time education.
p.1
Context
The college was last inspected in April 2005 when five curriculum areas were judged to be good and 3 were judged as satisfactory. Provision in construction was judged to be inadequate. Leadership and management of the college were satisfactory while social inclusion and support for students were good. The construction provision was re-inspected in April 2006 when it was judged to be good.
p.1
progress
Adult learners made up 66% of the enrolments in 2007. Between 2004/05 and 2005/06 adult success rates at level 1 improved from 37% to 57%, but then declined to 47% in 2006/07. At level two there was good improvement in 2005/06 but the rate dropped back in 2006/07 to 49%. Success rates at level 3 have been variable, but improved from 66% to 73% in 2006/07.
p.1
progress
The college has identified poor retention of adult learners on information communications technology (ICT) qualifications as a key factor contributing to the fall in success rates. A new manager and team of staff have been appointed in this curriculum area, and greater control is being applied to the recruitment of learners at the off-site learning centre. It is too early to judge the effectiveness of these actions.
p.1
progress
English for speakers of other languages (ESOL) provision was also identified as an area with poor success rates for adult learners. Learners have since been enrolled on more appropriate single ESOL qualifications and initial testing, linked to improved advice and guidance is in place. The arrangements for monitoring retention and attendance rates have been improved. Retention rates at all ESOL levels have improved during the current year.
p.1
progress
Reasonable progress has been made in improving success rates for 16 to 18 year old learners, who made up some 44% of starts in 2006/07. The level 1 success rate in 2006/07 increased by five% to 75%.The level 2 and level 3 success rates in 2006/07 were 67% and 72% respectively, an average improvement of 8% on the previous year.
p.2
progress
The progress made in improving GCE AS success rates has been insignificant. Rates for 16 to 18 year old learners have been consistently low at an average of 46% between 2003 and 2006. In 2006/07 the rate fell to a very poor eight%. Learner numbers have steadily declined over the last four years with only 24 starts in 2006/07. AS level success rates for adult learners improved in 2005/06 to 53%, but declined in 2006/07 to 42%. The college has taken the decision to restrict entry to the AS provision to those learners for whom the qualification is an integral part of other programmes. It is too early to judge the effectiveness of these actions.
p.2
progress
Although work-based learning success rates for apprentices on engineering and construction improved in 2006/07, they remained low in engineering at 53%. The number of apprentices who completed the framework in retail were also low. In hairdressing, only 26% have so far completed their apprenticeship in 2007/08.
p.2
progress
Success rates in key skills have improved slightly for 16 to 18 year olds at level 1 and adult learners made good improvement. Level 2 success rates fell in 2006/07 for both 16 to 18 year olds and adults. At level 3, success rates fell slightly for 16 to 18 year olds but showed good improvement for adults in 2006/07.
p.2
progress
Retention rates for adult learners have shown a reasonable improvement. In April 2008 retention was 78% compared with 71% at the same time last year. Retention rates for 16 to 18 year olds has remained static at 83% over the same period.
p.2
Reasonable
Clear procedures to observe all staff at least once a year are established and the college sets challenging targets for teachers to achieve a minimum grade 2 on observations. Those who are graded as satisfactory or below are given appropriate support before being re-observed. Observations are carried out by a trained team of internal observers. While their work is moderated internally and by external qualified practitioners, some observations are not recorded in sufficient detail to match the grades awarded. College data indicates improvements have been made to the quality of teaching and learning since the previous inspection. The college has recently started to use peer observations to share good practice more effectively and has just purchased software to analyse observations in more detail.
p.2
progress
The tracking of learners’ progress has been improved and the college has recently introduced a revised procedure for work-based reviews with more involvement of curriculum specialists. Timely reviews are undertaken but some target setting is weak and there is insufficient reinforcement and checking of equality of opportunities. This has been recognised by the college and actions are planned to resolve this as an area for improvement. The college has improved its links with employers and now offers a recruitment service to ensure learners have access to a wide range of suitable work opportunities.
p.3
progress
Significant progress has been made in incorporating the work of the college training organisation, Basingstoke Engineering Training Association (BETA), into the quality improvement arrangements. Lesson observations have been established, and training provided in lesson planning. Staff have been offered teacher training opportunities. Plans are in place to support greater sharing of good practice.
p.3
progress
Employers are now more involved in planning and reporting on work based learning provision. Student progress has improved, for example, following negotiations with an employer regarding access to on site resources. Incidents of poor behaviour by learners are addressed appropriately. College reviews indicate that the confidence of employers in the college’s work-based learning has improved.
p.3
progress
Data is now more thoroughly scrutinised by senior managers. The college has a clear procedure to highlight courses that are underperforming and this information is regularly reviewed by the college quality improvement group. Heads of curriculum areas have access to appropriate data, but it is not easily accessed. Value added data is now used more effectively to identify improvements and curriculum heads and course tutors have now been trained in its use.
p.3
progress
CRB checks have been completed for all relevant staff. Equality of opportunities data is well scrutinised and learner success is appropriately monitored by age, gender and ethnicity. Data on the success of students who are given additional learning support is also analysed. The college recognises the need to examine this data by postcode to analyse the achievements of students from more deprived areas. In curriculum areas such as engineering and hairdressing, the college has made good efforts to encourage more balanced gender participation. Marketing materials in these areas have been carefully produced and female changing facilities are now in place in the engineering department.
p.4
progress
The 2006/07 self-assessment report and the associated quality improvement plan provide suitable tools for quality improvement. The college has worked hard to improve its course review and evaluation process. Documentation has been re- written to provide greater clarity and reduce the paper burden on course teams. Reviews are now timed to match key events in the college year. The involvement of learners and employers in the development of the self-assessment report has improved with both groups now represented at curriculum and college level review boards. Basingstoke has links with two other colleges in providing mangers to act as ‘critical friends’ at the review and moderation of the self-assessment report.
p.4
progress
Reasonable progress has been made to improve the outreach adult education provision which was fully integrated in to the quality assurance cycle for the first time this year. Staff training and lesson observations have increased in frequency. Team working with staff delivering external courses has improved. Internal verification arrangements have been improved.
p.4
progress
Reasonable progress has been made in improving the Entry to Employment provision. This was identified in the previous self-assessment report as being inadequate in both learner volume and outcomes. Three key staff left this curriculum area in 2006/07 and a new manager was appointed in October 2007. Team working has improved and there has been a reasonable improvement in learner outcomes to date.
p.4
progress
Work will be completed during summer 2008 to provide dedicated information and learning technologies (ILT) facilities in all curriculum areas. Significant investment has been agreed to improve accommodation for computing courses by September 2008. Teaching spaces will be re-configured, sound proofing improved and new equipment installed. It is too early to judge the value of these extensive changes. Good progress has been made in providing accommodation for on-line and year round examinations. The college has begun an appropriate investment in updating all its IT resources over the next five years.
p.5
progress
Progress has been slow in improving the lower concourse area which was identified in the self-assessment report as requiring improved temperature control and carpeting. Light reduction film is to be fitted to the large windows and new carpet fitted, but the college recognises that existing environmental control equipment is not sufficiently effective.
p.5
progress
Initial planning and consultations to re-site the college are making reasonable progress. A potential site, for a proposed new learning campus, is being discussed and outline plans are currently being considered by the LSC. College managers have a target of 20011/12 for completion of the new facility.
p.5
progress
provided that the information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk).
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion