Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 28 Dec 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Gwen Coates

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Gwen Coates

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+80Very positivemore positive than 82% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentstrongenjoymenteffectivelyimprovedclear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings319w+78
  • What needs to improve80w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
389
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 31, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 80%What needs to improve 20%

Full report text

Mr D Rowe Sutton School and Specialist College Scotts Green Close Russells Hall Estate Dudley West Midlands

p.1

enterprise education

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visit to look at work in business and enterprise education.

p.1

enterprise education

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

enterprise education

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: visits to lessons, discussions with pupils and staff, review of documentation and pupils’ work.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 Enterprise education is embedded in the whole curriculum at Key Stage 3 and Key Stage 4.  The clear enjoyment students get from enterprise-related activities and the confidence with which they are able to discuss their knowledge, understanding and experience.  The very strong focus on preparing students for their adult life after school and, in particular, the excellent contribution the school makes to their future economic well-being.  The commitment of all staff and the good use of both teaching and non-teaching staff in providing enterprise education for students.  The partnerships the school has developed with other schools and colleges and with local businesses in order to enhance the provision for enterprise education and students’ work-related learning.  The reward system that encourages good behaviour and supports the development of students’ personal finance education. Alexandra House T 08456 404040

p.1

Features of good practice observed

33 Kingsway F 020 7421 6855 London www.ofsted.gov.uk WC2B 6SE enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk  The very good accommodation and facilities and the learning resources for enterprise education that have been carefully adapted and developed to meet the specific needs of students.  The carefully thought-out assessment system to evaluate students’ progress in developing enterprise capability.  Leadership and management that is very effectively influencing the development of this valuable aspect of the curriculum.

p.1

Areas for development that we discussed included:

 monitoring the implementation of the assessment system to ensure its effectiveness in tracking students’ progress and identifying where whole school provision may need to be improved.

p.2

Areas for development that we discussed included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop business and enterprise in the school.

p.2

Areas for development that we discussed included:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion